From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: remove unused leftover basedie step code
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 11:44:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ed6b3c8f.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240822150716.GL5774@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, 22 Aug 2024, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:39:46PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> The basedie step initialization as well as its last users were removed
>> in commit 326e30e4624c ("drm/i915: Drop dead code for pvc"). Follow
>> through with removing the unused macros and struct member and debug
>> logging.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 5 -----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 1 -
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h | 1 -
>> 3 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index 3b1b16e71cf9..eb4c33e83c7c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -410,7 +410,6 @@ static inline struct intel_gt *to_gt(const struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>
>> #define INTEL_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->step.graphics_step)
>> #define INTEL_MEDIA_STEP(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->step.media_step)
>> -#define INTEL_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->step.basedie_step)
>>
>> #define IS_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
>> (drm_WARN_ON(&(__i915)->drm, INTEL_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915) == STEP_NONE), \
>> @@ -420,10 +419,6 @@ static inline struct intel_gt *to_gt(const struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> (drm_WARN_ON(&(__i915)->drm, INTEL_MEDIA_STEP(__i915) == STEP_NONE), \
>> INTEL_MEDIA_STEP(__i915) >= (since) && INTEL_MEDIA_STEP(__i915) < (until))
>>
>> -#define IS_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
>> - (drm_WARN_ON(&(__i915)->drm, INTEL_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915) == STEP_NONE), \
>> - INTEL_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915) >= (since) && INTEL_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915) < (until))
>> -
>> static __always_inline unsigned int
>> __platform_mask_index(const struct intel_runtime_info *info,
>> enum intel_platform p)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> index d92b3050ac78..b485e959f064 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> @@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ void intel_device_info_print(const struct intel_device_info *info,
>>
>> drm_printf(p, "graphics stepping: %s\n", intel_step_name(runtime->step.graphics_step));
>> drm_printf(p, "media stepping: %s\n", intel_step_name(runtime->step.media_step));
>> - drm_printf(p, "base die stepping: %s\n", intel_step_name(runtime->step.basedie_step));
>>
>> drm_printf(p, "gt: %d\n", info->gt);
>> drm_printf(p, "memory-regions: 0x%x\n", info->memory_regions);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
>> index 83bd1190edf5..22f1d6905160 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
>> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ struct intel_step_info {
>> */
>> u8 graphics_step; /* Represents the compute tile on Xe_HPC */
>
> Looks like we should drop the comment on this line too (Xe_HPC is the
> name of PVC's IP)...
Cleanups for another time...
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Thanks for the review, pushed this one.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> u8 media_step;
>> - u8 basedie_step;
>> };
>>
>> #define STEP_ENUM_VAL(name) STEP_##name,
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-26 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 14:39 [PATCH] drm/i915: remove unused leftover basedie step code Jani Nikula
2024-08-22 15:07 ` Matt Roper
2024-08-26 8:44 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-08-22 15:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for " Patchwork
2024-08-22 15:40 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-08-22 21:55 ` [PATCH] " Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-08-23 8:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: remove unused leftover basedie step code (rev2) Patchwork
2024-08-23 8:59 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-08-24 11:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ed6b3c8f.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox