From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Move sseu helper functions to intel_sseu.h
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:02:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ef5jrhlz.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190429155135.6468-5-stuart.summers@intel.com>
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019, Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 47 ------------------------
> 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> index f5ff6b7a756a..5127b4ff92bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> @@ -63,12 +63,59 @@ intel_sseu_from_device_info(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
> return value;
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned int sseu_subslice_total(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
> +{
> + unsigned int i, total = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sseu->subslice_mask); i++)
> + total += hweight8(sseu->subslice_mask[i]);
> +
> + return total;
> +}
> +
> static inline unsigned int
> sseu_subslices_per_slice(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice)
> {
> return hweight8(sseu->subslice_mask[slice]);
> }
>
> +static inline int sseu_eu_idx(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
> + int slice, int subslice)
> +{
> + int subslice_stride = DIV_ROUND_UP(sseu->max_eus_per_subslice,
> + BITS_PER_BYTE);
> + int slice_stride = sseu->max_subslices * subslice_stride;
> +
> + return slice * slice_stride + subslice * subslice_stride;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u16 sseu_get_eus(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
> + int slice, int subslice)
> +{
> + int i, offset = sseu_eu_idx(sseu, slice, subslice);
> + u16 eu_mask = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0;
> + i < DIV_ROUND_UP(sseu->max_eus_per_subslice, BITS_PER_BYTE); i++) {
> + eu_mask |= ((u16) sseu->eu_mask[offset + i]) <<
> + (i * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> + }
> +
> + return eu_mask;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void sseu_set_eus(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
> + int slice, int subslice, u16 eu_mask)
> +{
> + int i, offset = sseu_eu_idx(sseu, slice, subslice);
> +
> + for (i = 0;
> + i < DIV_ROUND_UP(sseu->max_eus_per_subslice, BITS_PER_BYTE); i++) {
> + sseu->eu_mask[offset + i] =
> + (eu_mask >> (BITS_PER_BYTE * i)) & 0xff;
> + }
> +}
> +
I'd appreciate follow-up to rename these functions
intel_sseu_*. Functions in intel_foo.[ch] should be named intel_foo_*().
Also, I'm starting to wonder the benefits of the plethora of inline
functions we use. Should we move them to the .c file? It can't be a perf
thing can it?
BR,
Jani.
> u32 intel_sseu_make_rpcs(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> const struct intel_sseu *req_sseu);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> index 5a2e17d6146b..6412a9c72898 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> @@ -218,53 +218,6 @@ struct intel_driver_caps {
> bool has_logical_contexts:1;
> };
>
> -static inline unsigned int sseu_subslice_total(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
> -{
> - unsigned int i, total = 0;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sseu->subslice_mask); i++)
> - total += hweight8(sseu->subslice_mask[i]);
> -
> - return total;
> -}
> -
> -static inline int sseu_eu_idx(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
> - int slice, int subslice)
> -{
> - int subslice_stride = DIV_ROUND_UP(sseu->max_eus_per_subslice,
> - BITS_PER_BYTE);
> - int slice_stride = sseu->max_subslices * subslice_stride;
> -
> - return slice * slice_stride + subslice * subslice_stride;
> -}
> -
> -static inline u16 sseu_get_eus(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
> - int slice, int subslice)
> -{
> - int i, offset = sseu_eu_idx(sseu, slice, subslice);
> - u16 eu_mask = 0;
> -
> - for (i = 0;
> - i < DIV_ROUND_UP(sseu->max_eus_per_subslice, BITS_PER_BYTE); i++) {
> - eu_mask |= ((u16) sseu->eu_mask[offset + i]) <<
> - (i * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> - }
> -
> - return eu_mask;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void sseu_set_eus(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu,
> - int slice, int subslice, u16 eu_mask)
> -{
> - int i, offset = sseu_eu_idx(sseu, slice, subslice);
> -
> - for (i = 0;
> - i < DIV_ROUND_UP(sseu->max_eus_per_subslice, BITS_PER_BYTE); i++) {
> - sseu->eu_mask[offset + i] =
> - (eu_mask >> (BITS_PER_BYTE * i)) & 0xff;
> - }
> -}
> -
> const char *intel_platform_name(enum intel_platform platform);
>
> void intel_device_info_subplatform_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-29 15:51 [PATCH 0/5] Refactor to expand subslice mask Stuart Summers
2019-04-29 15:51 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Use local variable for SSEU info in GETPARAM ioctl Stuart Summers
2019-04-30 8:58 ` Jani Nikula
2019-05-01 0:38 ` Summers, Stuart
2019-04-29 15:51 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Add macro for SSEU stride calculation Stuart Summers
2019-04-29 15:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Move calculation of subslices per slice to new function Stuart Summers
2019-04-29 15:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Move sseu helper functions to intel_sseu.h Stuart Summers
2019-04-30 9:02 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2019-04-30 14:19 ` Summers, Stuart
2019-04-29 15:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Expand subslice mask Stuart Summers
2019-04-30 9:03 ` Jani Nikula
2019-04-30 14:16 ` Summers, Stuart
2019-04-29 16:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Refactor to expand subslice mask (rev4) Patchwork
2019-04-29 16:11 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-04-29 16:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-04-29 21:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-26 20:24 [PATCH 0/5] Refactor to expand subslice mask Stuart Summers
2019-04-26 20:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Move sseu helper functions to intel_sseu.h Stuart Summers
2019-04-25 22:24 [PATCH 0/5] Refactor to expand subslice mask Stuart Summers
2019-04-25 22:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Move sseu helper functions to intel_sseu.h Stuart Summers
2019-04-19 0:00 [PATCH 0/4] Refactor to expand subslice mask Stuart Summers
2019-04-25 16:28 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Stuart Summers
2019-04-25 16:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Move sseu helper functions to intel_sseu.h Stuart Summers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ef5jrhlz.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox