Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, andrzej.hajda@intel.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/pmu: Make PMU sample array two-dimensional
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 10:38:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fs7lr5oj.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <beaf5d7d-a611-6c87-efa7-5b4c87e5ac7d@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, 24 May 2023 04:38:18 -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>

Hi Tvrtko,

> On 23/05/2023 16:19, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> > No functional changes but we can remove some unsightly index computation
> > and read/write functions if we convert the PMU sample array from a
> > one-dimensional to a two-dimensional array.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 60 ++++++++++-----------------------
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h |  2 +-
> >   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> > index b47d890d4ada1..137e0df9573ee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> > @@ -195,33 +195,6 @@ static inline s64 ktime_since_raw(const ktime_t kt)
> >	return ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(ktime_get_raw(), kt));
> >   }
> >   -static unsigned int
> > -__sample_idx(struct i915_pmu *pmu, unsigned int gt_id, int sample)
> > -{
> > -	unsigned int idx = gt_id * __I915_NUM_PMU_SAMPLERS + sample;
> > -
> > -	GEM_BUG_ON(idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(pmu->sample));
> > -
> > -	return idx;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static u64 read_sample(struct i915_pmu *pmu, unsigned int gt_id, int sample)
> > -{
> > -	return pmu->sample[__sample_idx(pmu, gt_id, sample)].cur;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void
> > -store_sample(struct i915_pmu *pmu, unsigned int gt_id, int sample, u64 val)
> > -{
> > -	pmu->sample[__sample_idx(pmu, gt_id, sample)].cur = val;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void
> > -add_sample_mult(struct i915_pmu *pmu, unsigned int gt_id, int sample, u32 val, u32 mul)
> > -{
> > -	pmu->sample[__sample_idx(pmu, gt_id, sample)].cur += mul_u32_u32(val, mul);
> > -}
>
> IMO read and store helpers could have stayed and just changed the
> implementation. Like add_sample_mult which you just moved. I would have
> been a smaller patch. So dunno.. a bit of a reluctant r-b.

Are you referring just to add_sample_mult or to all the other functions
too? add_sample_mult I moved it to where it was before bc4be0a38b63
("drm/i915/pmu: Prepare for multi-tile non-engine counters"), could have
left it here I guess.

The other read and store helpers are not needed with the 2-d array at all
since the compiler itself will do that, so I thought it was better to get
rid of them completely.

Let me know if you want any changes, otherwise I will leave as is.

> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Thanks for the review. Thanks Andrzej too :)
--
Ashutosh

> > -
> >   static u64 get_rc6(struct intel_gt *gt)
> >   {
> >	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
> > @@ -240,7 +213,7 @@ static u64 get_rc6(struct intel_gt *gt)
> >	spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
> >		if (awake) {
> > -		store_sample(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6, val);
> > +		pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6].cur = val;
> >	} else {
> >		/*
> >		 * We think we are runtime suspended.
> > @@ -250,13 +223,13 @@ static u64 get_rc6(struct intel_gt *gt)
> >		 * counter value.
> >		 */
> >		val = ktime_since_raw(pmu->sleep_last[gt_id]);
> > -		val += read_sample(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6);
> > +		val += pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6].cur;
> >	}
> >   -	if (val < read_sample(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED))
> > -		val = read_sample(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED);
> > +	if (val < pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED].cur)
> > +		val = pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED].cur;
> >	else
> > -		store_sample(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED, val);
> > +		pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED].cur = val;
> >		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
> >   @@ -275,9 +248,8 @@ static void init_rc6(struct i915_pmu *pmu)
> >		with_intel_runtime_pm(gt->uncore->rpm, wakeref) {
> >			u64 val = __get_rc6(gt);
> >   -			store_sample(pmu, i, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6, val);
> > -			store_sample(pmu, i, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED,
> > -				     val);
> > +			pmu->sample[i][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6].cur = val;
> > +			pmu->sample[i][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6_LAST_REPORTED].cur = val;
> >			pmu->sleep_last[i] = ktime_get_raw();
> >		}
> >	}
> > @@ -287,7 +259,7 @@ static void park_rc6(struct intel_gt *gt)
> >   {
> >	struct i915_pmu *pmu = &gt->i915->pmu;
> >   -	store_sample(pmu, gt->info.id, __I915_SAMPLE_RC6, __get_rc6(gt));
> > +	pmu->sample[gt->info.id][__I915_SAMPLE_RC6].cur = __get_rc6(gt);
> >	pmu->sleep_last[gt->info.id] = ktime_get_raw();
> >   }
> >   @@ -428,6 +400,12 @@ engines_sample(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned int
> > period_ns)
> >	}
> >   }
> >   +static void
> > +add_sample_mult(struct i915_pmu_sample *sample, u32 val, u32 mul)
> > +{
> > +	sample->cur += mul_u32_u32(val, mul);
> > +}
> > +
> >   static bool
> >   frequency_sampling_enabled(struct i915_pmu *pmu, unsigned int gt)
> >   {
> > @@ -467,12 +445,12 @@ frequency_sample(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned int period_ns)
> >		if (!val)
> >			val = intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->cur_freq);
> >   -		add_sample_mult(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_ACT,
> > +		add_sample_mult(&pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_ACT],
> >				val, period_ns / 1000);
> >	}
> >		if (pmu->enable &
> > config_mask(__I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY(gt_id))) {
> > -		add_sample_mult(pmu, gt_id, __I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_REQ,
> > +		add_sample_mult(&pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_REQ],
> >				intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(rps),
> >				period_ns / 1000);
> >	}
> > @@ -673,14 +651,12 @@ static u64 __i915_pmu_event_read(struct perf_event *event)
> >		switch (config) {
> >		case I915_PMU_ACTUAL_FREQUENCY:
> >			val =
> > -			   div_u64(read_sample(pmu, gt_id,
> > -					       __I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_ACT),
> > +			   div_u64(pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_ACT].cur,
> >				   USEC_PER_SEC /* to MHz */);
> >			break;
> >		case I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY:
> >			val =
> > -			   div_u64(read_sample(pmu, gt_id,
> > -					       __I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_REQ),
> > +			   div_u64(pmu->sample[gt_id][__I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_REQ].cur,
> >				   USEC_PER_SEC /* to MHz */);
> >			break;
> >		case I915_PMU_INTERRUPTS:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> > index 33d80fbaab8bc..d20592e7db999 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct i915_pmu {
> >	 * Only global counters are held here, while the per-engine ones are in
> >	 * struct intel_engine_cs.
> >	 */
> > -	struct i915_pmu_sample sample[I915_PMU_MAX_GTS * __I915_NUM_PMU_SAMPLERS];
> > +	struct i915_pmu_sample sample[I915_PMU_MAX_GTS][__I915_NUM_PMU_SAMPLERS];
> >	/**
> >	 * @sleep_last: Last time GT parked for RC6 estimation.
> >	 */

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-24 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-23 15:19 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/pmu: couple of cleanups Ashutosh Dixit
2023-05-23 15:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/pmu: Turn off the timer to sample frequencies when GT is parked Ashutosh Dixit
2023-05-24  9:12   ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-05-24 21:46     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-25  8:00       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-05-23 15:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/pmu: Make PMU sample array two-dimensional Ashutosh Dixit
2023-05-24  9:14   ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-05-24 11:38   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-05-24 17:38     ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2023-05-24 17:53       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-05-24 21:46         ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-23 16:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/pmu: couple of cleanups Patchwork
2023-05-23 21:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-05-24  6:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-24 21:56 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/2] " Ashutosh Dixit
2023-05-24 21:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/pmu: Make PMU sample array two-dimensional Ashutosh Dixit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fs7lr5oj.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox