From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: rename display.version to display.ver
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:04:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fszvkbl1.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210411153358.GA1637800@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:52:16PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> The macro we use to check is called DISPLAY_VER(). While using this
>> macro and the new ones being added in following changes I made the
>> mistake multiple times when mixing both "ver" and "version". Although
>> it's usually better to prefer the complete name, the shorhand
>> DISPLAY_VER() / GRAPHICS_VER / MEDIA_VER are clear and cause less
>> visual polution.
>>
>> Another issue is when copying the variable to other places.
>> "display.version" would be copied to a "display_version" variable which
>> is long and would make people abbreviate as "version", or "display_ver".
>> In the first case it's not always clear what version refers to, and in
>> the second case it just hints it should be the name in the first place.
>>
>> So, in the same way use used "gen" rather than "generation", use "ver"
>> instead of "version".
>
> I'm indifferent on "ver" versus "version" but Jani suggested using the
> full word "version" when we were first adding this, so you should
> probably get an ack from him.
For display version there were precious few places where we actually
needed to refer to it, so I thought the longer version was better for
clarity.
I realize graphics_ver is used much more (although not necessarily in
reference to intel_device_info) and it may get tedious to use the longer
version. And it's better to have all of them unified.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
>
> Matt
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index 69e43bf91a15..8c62bb2abd31 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -1237,7 +1237,7 @@ static inline struct drm_i915_private *pdev_to_i915(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> #define INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen)
>> #define INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) (RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->device_id)
>>
>> -#define DISPLAY_VER(i915) (INTEL_INFO(i915)->display.version)
>> +#define DISPLAY_VER(i915) (INTEL_INFO(i915)->display.ver)
>> #define IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(i915, from, until) \
>> (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= (from) && DISPLAY_VER(i915) <= (until))
>> #define IS_DISPLAY_VER(i915, v) (DISPLAY_VER(i915) == (v))
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>> index 480553746794..ce5cbeaf036d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
>> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
>> #include "i915_selftest.h"
>>
>> #define PLATFORM(x) .platform = (x)
>> -#define GEN(x) .gen = (x), .gen_mask = BIT((x) - 1), .display.version = (x)
>> +#define GEN(x) .gen = (x), .gen_mask = BIT((x) - 1), .display.ver = (x)
>>
>> #define I845_PIPE_OFFSETS \
>> .pipe_offsets = { \
>> @@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info bxt_info = {
>> static const struct intel_device_info glk_info = {
>> GEN9_LP_FEATURES,
>> PLATFORM(INTEL_GEMINILAKE),
>> - .display.version = 10,
>> + .display.ver = 10,
>> .ddb_size = 1024,
>> GLK_COLORS,
>> };
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>> index 2f442d418a15..b16c75927a12 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ struct intel_device_info {
>> #undef DEFINE_FLAG
>>
>> struct {
>> - u8 version;
>> + u8 ver;
>>
>> #define DEFINE_FLAG(name) u8 name:1
>> DEV_INFO_DISPLAY_FOR_EACH_FLAG(DEFINE_FLAG);
>> --
>> 2.31.1
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-12 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-08 4:52 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] drm/i915: Extend GEN renames to the rest of the driver Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-08 4:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: rename display.version to display.ver Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-10 0:07 ` Souza, Jose
2021-04-11 15:33 ` Matt Roper
2021-04-12 11:04 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-04-08 4:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915: add macros for graphics and media versions Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-10 1:09 ` Souza, Jose
2021-04-12 11:12 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-12 11:40 ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-12 20:33 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-08 4:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915/gt: replace gen use in intel_engine_cs Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-08 4:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/selftests: replace unused mask with simple version Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-08 4:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915/selftests: eliminate use of gen_mask Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-08 4:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915: finish removal " Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-08 4:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915: eliminate remaining uses of intel_device_info->gen Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-08 4:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915: finish removal of gen from intel_device_info Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-08 4:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915: add media and display versions to device_info print Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-08 4:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915/display: use DISPLAY_VER() on remaining users Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-08 4:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: replace IS_GEN and friends with IS_GRAPHICS_VER Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-08 4:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915: split dgfx features from gen 12 Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-08 5:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Extend GEN renames to the rest of the driver (rev2) Patchwork
2021-04-08 5:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-04-08 5:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-04-08 5:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-04-08 7:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-08 0:41 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] drm/i915: Extend GEN renames to the rest of the driver Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-08 0:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: rename display.version to display.ver Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fszvkbl1.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox