From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com, clinton.a.taylor@intel.com,
shekhar.chauhan@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/dp: Increase idle pattern wait timeout to 2ms
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 10:46:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87il225qpo.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240304050631.774920-1-shekhar.chauhan@intel.com>
On Mon, 04 Mar 2024, Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@intel.com> wrote:
> Currently, the driver is only waiting for 1ms for
> idle patterns. But starting from LNL and beyond,
> the MST wants the driver to wait for 1640us before
What does it mean that "the MST wants"?
> timing out (which we round up to 2ms).
>
> v1: Introduced the 2ms wait timeout.
> v2: Segregated the wait timeout for platforms before & after LNL.
I did not ask for this. I would rather all platforms used 2 ms. I even
said the original change looked fine. But I'd like it to be explained in
the commit message.
> v3: Fixed 2 cosmetic changes.
>
> BSpec: 68849
> Signed-off-by: Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index bea441590204..b59adb7685b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -3677,12 +3677,19 @@ static void intel_ddi_set_idle_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> */
> if (port == PORT_A && DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12)
> return;
> -
> - if (intel_de_wait_for_set(dev_priv,
> - dp_tp_status_reg(encoder, crtc_state),
> - DP_TP_STATUS_IDLE_DONE, 1))
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 20) {
> + if (intel_de_wait_for_set(dev_priv,
> + dp_tp_status_reg(encoder, crtc_state),
> + DP_TP_STATUS_IDLE_DONE, 2))
> + drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "Timed out waiting for DP idle patterns\n");
> + } else {
> + if (intel_de_wait_for_set(dev_priv,
> + dp_tp_status_reg(encoder, crtc_state),
> + DP_TP_STATUS_IDLE_DONE, 1))
> drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
> "Timed out waiting for DP idle patterns\n");
> + }
So I'd like you to go back to how it was originally.
> }
>
> static bool intel_ddi_is_audio_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-04 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-04 5:06 [PATCH v3] drm/i915/dp: Increase idle pattern wait timeout to 2ms Shekhar Chauhan
2024-03-04 8:46 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-03-04 11:38 ` Chauhan, Shekhar
2024-03-04 11:51 ` Jani Nikula
2024-03-04 23:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: Increase idle pattern wait timeout to 2ms (rev2) Patchwork
2024-03-04 23:37 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-03-05 1:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87il225qpo.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=clinton.a.taylor@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=shekhar.chauhan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox