Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915: nuke i915->gt0

[Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>]

On Mon, 02 Oct 2023, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Jani,
>
> adding a few folks in Cc for some extra eyes on this series.

Thanks for the reviews and acks, pushed to drm-intel-next.

drm-intel-next instead of drm-intel-gt-next because of the changes in
i915_drv.h, and it's easier to sync from din to dign than vice versa.

BR,
Jani.


>
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:47:01AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Chopping up [1] to more digestable pieces. Start off with nuking
>> i915->gt0.
>> 
>> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/124418/
>> 
>> Jani Nikula (3):
>>   drm/i915/mocs: use to_gt() instead of direct &i915->gt
>>   drm/i915: allocate i915->gt0 dynamically
>>   drm/i915/gt: remove i915->gt0 in favour of i915->gt[0]
>> 
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c               | 10 +++++++---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c             |  4 ++--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h                  | 10 ++--------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c |  1 -
>>  4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> Michal, Michal and Tomasz, can you please check here?
>
> Thanks,
> Andi

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel