Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/16] drm/i915: Shuffle some PLL code around
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 12:01:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k09bu2rd.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220617160510.2082-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, 17 Jun 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Shuffle some PLL functions around a bit to avoid ugle
> forward declarations later on. No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 176 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index ddae7e42ac46..bfccc96f16fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -905,37 +905,6 @@ hsw_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock /* in Hz */,
>  	*r2_out = best.r2;
>  }
>  
> -static int
> -hsw_ddi_wrpll_compute_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -			   struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> -{
> -	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> -		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> -	unsigned int p, n2, r2;
> -
> -	hsw_ddi_calculate_wrpll(crtc_state->port_clock * 1000, &r2, &n2, &p);
> -
> -	crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.wrpll =
> -		WRPLL_PLL_ENABLE | WRPLL_REF_LCPLL |
> -		WRPLL_DIVIDER_REFERENCE(r2) | WRPLL_DIVIDER_FEEDBACK(n2) |
> -		WRPLL_DIVIDER_POST(p);
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static struct intel_shared_dpll *
> -hsw_ddi_wrpll_get_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -		       struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> -{
> -	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> -		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> -
> -	return intel_find_shared_dpll(state, crtc,
> -				      &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state,
> -				      BIT(DPLL_ID_WRPLL2) |
> -				      BIT(DPLL_ID_WRPLL1));
> -}
> -
>  static int hsw_ddi_wrpll_get_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  				  const struct intel_shared_dpll *pll,
>  				  const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *pll_state)
> @@ -976,6 +945,37 @@ static int hsw_ddi_wrpll_get_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	return (refclk * n / 10) / (p * r) * 2;
>  }
>  
> +static int
> +hsw_ddi_wrpll_compute_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +			   struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +{
> +	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> +		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> +	unsigned int p, n2, r2;
> +
> +	hsw_ddi_calculate_wrpll(crtc_state->port_clock * 1000, &r2, &n2, &p);
> +
> +	crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.wrpll =
> +		WRPLL_PLL_ENABLE | WRPLL_REF_LCPLL |
> +		WRPLL_DIVIDER_REFERENCE(r2) | WRPLL_DIVIDER_FEEDBACK(n2) |
> +		WRPLL_DIVIDER_POST(p);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct intel_shared_dpll *
> +hsw_ddi_wrpll_get_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +		       struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +{
> +	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> +		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> +
> +	return intel_find_shared_dpll(state, crtc,
> +				      &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state,
> +				      BIT(DPLL_ID_WRPLL2) |
> +				      BIT(DPLL_ID_WRPLL1));
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  hsw_ddi_lcpll_compute_dpll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
> @@ -1618,43 +1618,6 @@ skl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock /* in Hz */,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int skl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> -{
> -	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> -	struct skl_wrpll_params wrpll_params = {};
> -	u32 ctrl1, cfgcr1, cfgcr2;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * See comment in intel_dpll_hw_state to understand why we always use 0
> -	 * as the DPLL id in this function.
> -	 */
> -	ctrl1 = DPLL_CTRL1_OVERRIDE(0);
> -
> -	ctrl1 |= DPLL_CTRL1_HDMI_MODE(0);
> -
> -	ret = skl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(crtc_state->port_clock * 1000,
> -				      i915->dpll.ref_clks.nssc, &wrpll_params);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	cfgcr1 = DPLL_CFGCR1_FREQ_ENABLE |
> -		DPLL_CFGCR1_DCO_FRACTION(wrpll_params.dco_fraction) |
> -		wrpll_params.dco_integer;
> -
> -	cfgcr2 = DPLL_CFGCR2_QDIV_RATIO(wrpll_params.qdiv_ratio) |
> -		DPLL_CFGCR2_QDIV_MODE(wrpll_params.qdiv_mode) |
> -		DPLL_CFGCR2_KDIV(wrpll_params.kdiv) |
> -		DPLL_CFGCR2_PDIV(wrpll_params.pdiv) |
> -		wrpll_params.central_freq;
> -
> -	crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.ctrl1 = ctrl1;
> -	crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cfgcr1 = cfgcr1;
> -	crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cfgcr2 = cfgcr2;
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static int skl_ddi_wrpll_get_freq(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  				  const struct intel_shared_dpll *pll,
>  				  const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *pll_state)
> @@ -1726,6 +1689,43 @@ static int skl_ddi_wrpll_get_freq(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  	return dco_freq / (p0 * p1 * p2 * 5);
>  }
>  
> +static int skl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> +	struct skl_wrpll_params wrpll_params = {};
> +	u32 ctrl1, cfgcr1, cfgcr2;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * See comment in intel_dpll_hw_state to understand why we always use 0
> +	 * as the DPLL id in this function.
> +	 */
> +	ctrl1 = DPLL_CTRL1_OVERRIDE(0);
> +
> +	ctrl1 |= DPLL_CTRL1_HDMI_MODE(0);
> +
> +	ret = skl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(crtc_state->port_clock * 1000,
> +				      i915->dpll.ref_clks.nssc, &wrpll_params);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	cfgcr1 = DPLL_CFGCR1_FREQ_ENABLE |
> +		DPLL_CFGCR1_DCO_FRACTION(wrpll_params.dco_fraction) |
> +		wrpll_params.dco_integer;
> +
> +	cfgcr2 = DPLL_CFGCR2_QDIV_RATIO(wrpll_params.qdiv_ratio) |
> +		DPLL_CFGCR2_QDIV_MODE(wrpll_params.qdiv_mode) |
> +		DPLL_CFGCR2_KDIV(wrpll_params.kdiv) |
> +		DPLL_CFGCR2_PDIV(wrpll_params.pdiv) |
> +		wrpll_params.central_freq;
> +
> +	crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.ctrl1 = ctrl1;
> +	crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cfgcr1 = cfgcr1;
> +	crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cfgcr2 = cfgcr2;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  skl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
> @@ -2245,26 +2245,6 @@ static int bxt_ddi_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int
> -bxt_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> -{
> -	struct dpll clk_div = {};
> -
> -	bxt_ddi_dp_pll_dividers(crtc_state, &clk_div);
> -
> -	return bxt_ddi_set_dpll_hw_state(crtc_state, &clk_div);
> -}
> -
> -static int
> -bxt_ddi_hdmi_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> -{
> -	struct dpll clk_div = {};
> -
> -	bxt_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(crtc_state, &clk_div);
> -
> -	return bxt_ddi_set_dpll_hw_state(crtc_state, &clk_div);
> -}
> -
>  static int bxt_ddi_pll_get_freq(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  				const struct intel_shared_dpll *pll,
>  				const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *pll_state)
> @@ -2282,6 +2262,26 @@ static int bxt_ddi_pll_get_freq(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  	return chv_calc_dpll_params(i915->dpll.ref_clks.nssc, &clock);
>  }
>  
> +static int
> +bxt_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct dpll clk_div = {};
> +
> +	bxt_ddi_dp_pll_dividers(crtc_state, &clk_div);
> +
> +	return bxt_ddi_set_dpll_hw_state(crtc_state, &clk_div);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +bxt_ddi_hdmi_set_dpll_hw_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct dpll clk_div = {};
> +
> +	bxt_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(crtc_state, &clk_div);
> +
> +	return bxt_ddi_set_dpll_hw_state(crtc_state, &clk_div);
> +}
> +
>  static int bxt_compute_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  			    struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  			    struct intel_encoder *encoder)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-20  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-17 16:04 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/16] drm/i915: Make fastset not suck and allow seamless M/N changes Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 16:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/16] drm/i915: Relocate intel_crtc_dotclock() Ville Syrjala
2022-06-20  9:01   ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-17 16:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/16] drm/i915: Shuffle some PLL code around Ville Syrjala
2022-06-20  9:01   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-06-17 16:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/16] drm/i915: Extract has_double_buffered_m_n() Ville Syrjala
2022-06-20  9:05   ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-20 17:05     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-06-17 16:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/16] drm/i915: Do .crtc_compute_clock() earlier Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 16:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/16] drm/i915: Reassign DPLLs only for crtcs going throug .compute_config() Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/16] drm/i915: Feed the DPLL output freq back into crtc_state Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/16] drm/i915: Compute clocks earlier Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/16] drm/i915: Make M/N checks non-fuzzy Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/16] drm/i915: Make all clock " Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/16] drm/i915: Set active dpll early for icl+ Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/16] drm/i915: Nuke fastet state copy hacks Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/16] drm/i915: Skip intel_modeset_pipe_config_late() if the pipe is not enabled Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/16] drm/i915: Add intel_panel_highest_mode() Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/16] drm/i915: Allow M/N change during fastset on bdw+ Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/16] drm/i915: Use a fixed N value always Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/16] drm/i915: Round TMDS clock to nearest Ville Syrjala
2022-06-17 19:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Make fastset not suck and allow seamless M/N changes (rev5) Patchwork
2022-06-17 20:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k09bu2rd.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox