public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Align the hangcheck wakeup to the nearest second
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 18:40:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mx01orl6.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349445188-16253-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

On Fri, 05 Oct 2012, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> round_jiffies() aligns the wakeup time to the nearest second in order to
> batch wakeups and reduce system load, which is useful for unimportant
> coarse timers like our hangcheck.
>
> Suggested-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |    1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |    3 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c |    5 ++---
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index d8043af..f79c664 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -460,6 +460,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private {
>  
>  	/* For hangcheck timer */
>  #define DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD 1500 /* in ms */
> +#define DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_JIFFIES msecs_to_jiffies(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD)
>  	struct timer_list hangcheck_timer;
>  	int hangcheck_count;
>  	uint32_t last_acthd[I915_NUM_RINGS];
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index c78f8e3..8e05d53 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2151,8 +2151,7 @@ i915_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
>  	if (!dev_priv->mm.suspended) {
>  		if (i915_enable_hangcheck) {
>  			mod_timer(&dev_priv->hangcheck_timer,
> -				  jiffies +
> -				  msecs_to_jiffies(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD));
> +				  round_jiffies_relative(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_JIFFIES));

What is DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD based on; specifically is it a strict
minimum value? Should round_jiffies_*up*_relative() be used instead?

BR,
Jani.


>  		}
>  		if (was_empty) {
>  			queue_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index e18e56b..67dc487 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -353,8 +353,7 @@ static void notify_ring(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	if (i915_enable_hangcheck) {
>  		dev_priv->hangcheck_count = 0;
>  		mod_timer(&dev_priv->hangcheck_timer,
> -			  jiffies +
> -			  msecs_to_jiffies(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD));
> +			  round_jiffies_relative(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_JIFFIES));
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -1787,7 +1786,7 @@ void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
>  repeat:
>  	/* Reset timer case chip hangs without another request being added */
>  	mod_timer(&dev_priv->hangcheck_timer,
> -		  jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD));
> +		  round_jiffies_relative(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_JIFFIES));
>  }
>  
>  /* drm_dma.h hooks
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-05 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-05 13:53 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Align the hangcheck wakeup to the nearest second Chris Wilson
2012-10-05 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Align the retire_requests worker " Chris Wilson
2012-10-05 15:18   ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-10-05 15:55     ` Chris Wilson
2012-10-05 16:22   ` Jani Nikula
2012-10-05 15:40 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2012-10-05 15:51   ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Align the hangcheck wakeup " Chris Wilson
2012-10-05 16:02 ` Chris Wilson
2012-10-05 16:02   ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Align the retire_requests worker " Chris Wilson
2012-10-08 10:59   ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Align the hangcheck wakeup " Jani Nikula
2012-10-08 16:46     ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mx01orl6.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox