Re: ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: uninitialized value on error path (rev3)

[Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:58:44AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 08:13:43PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
>> >> == Series Details ==
>> >> 
>> >> Series: drm/i915: uninitialized value on error path (rev3)
>> >> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/23038/
>> >> State : success
>> >
>> > These patchwork emails are sort of useless.  I wouldn't have sent the
>> > patch if it couldn't compile which is basically all this is testing.
>> > It's not exercising the failure path.
>> 
>> Yeah, the CI is not smart enough to know that just by looking at the
>> patch, so it'll test them all. ;)
>> 
>
> But could it just send responses if something fails?  Or it could be a
> much shorter email:
>
>     CI test successful.
>
>     Use X-mailer-blahblah to filter successful tests.
>
> We don't need to expose all the other internal information unless
> something fails.

Thanks, I passed on the feedback.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx