public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Manna, Animesh" <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/pps: Enable 2nd pps for dual EDP scenario
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 14:29:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r10br1zj.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH7PR11MB598191FC5E2ACA27BA1CD305F9489@PH7PR11MB5981.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, 16 Sep 2022, "Manna, Animesh" <animesh.manna@intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 2:28 PM
>> To: Manna, Animesh <animesh.manna@intel.com>
>> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>;
>> Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/pps: Enable 2nd pps for dual EDP scenario
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 02:01:02PM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
>> > >From display gen12 onwards to support dual EDP two instances of pps added.
>> > Currently backlight controller and pps instance can be mapped together
>> > for a specific panel. Extended support for gen12 for dual EDP usage.
>> >
>> > v1: Iniital revision
>> > v2: Called intel_bios_panel_init w/o PNPID before intel_pps_init.
>> > [Jani]
>> >
>> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> > Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 7 -------
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h | 7 +++++++
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c   | 9 ++++++---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c  | 2 +-
>> >  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> > index 28bdb936cd1f..5fd4c09dfa96 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> > @@ -706,13 +706,6 @@ static int fallback_get_panel_type(struct
>> drm_i915_private *i915,
>> >     return 0;
>> >  }
>> >
>> > -enum panel_type {
>> > -   PANEL_TYPE_OPREGION,
>> > -   PANEL_TYPE_VBT,
>> > -   PANEL_TYPE_PNPID,
>> > -   PANEL_TYPE_FALLBACK,
>> > -};
>> > -
>> >  static int get_panel_type(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> >                       const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata,
>> >                       const struct edid *edid)
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
>> > index e375405a7828..da01b13260ae 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
>> > @@ -231,6 +231,13 @@ struct mipi_pps_data {
>> >     u16 panel_power_cycle_delay;
>> >  } __packed;
>> >
>> > +enum panel_type {
>> > +   PANEL_TYPE_OPREGION,
>> > +   PANEL_TYPE_VBT,
>> > +   PANEL_TYPE_PNPID,
>> > +   PANEL_TYPE_FALLBACK,
>> > +};
>> > +

I don't want enum panel_type exposed from intel_bios.c at all, there's
no reason for that.

>> >  void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);  void
>> > intel_bios_init_panel(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> >                        struct intel_panel *panel,
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> > index c19e99ee06b6..6f7afa75ec4d 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> > @@ -5222,6 +5222,9 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp
>> *intel_dp,
>> >             return false;
>> >     }
>> >
>> > +   intel_bios_init_panel(dev_priv, &intel_connector->panel,
>> > +                         encoder->devdata, NULL);
>>
>> We don't want to go for the fallback type here if we the VBT wants us to use
>> pnpid. Maybe we should just remove the fallback type entirely? Or perhaps only
>> use it if the VBT panel type is entirely invalid?
>
> Ok, Can I add like below?
> If (!PANEL_TYPE_FALLBACK)
>         intel_pps_init(intel_dp);
>
> But to read EDID pps_init should be called before it. Or else I can enable both the pps and later disable the unused one.

The first call should init everything if it can (panel type is *not*
pnpid). Fallback is fine in that case too.

If panel type indicates pnpid, intel_bios_init_panel() should set the
pps id to, say, -1, so intel_pps_init() or more specifically
bxt_power_sequencer_idx() can use some default or look at the hardware
or whatever.

intel_bios_init_panel() should probably also return a value on pnpid
indicating intel_edp_init_connector() should call
intel_bios_init_panel() again, this time with EDID. (Note: I kind of
like separating returning the value and setting the pps id to -1. I
don't want intel_edp_init_connector() to look at pps id, that's for pps,
and I don't want to pass flags all the way to bxt_power_sequencer_idx()
either.)


BR,
Jani.


>
> Regards,
> Animesh
>
>> > +
>> >     intel_pps_init(intel_dp);
>> >
>> >     /* Cache DPCD and EDID for edp. */
>> > @@ -5255,9 +5258,9 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp
>> *intel_dp,
>> >             edid = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>> >     }
>> >     intel_connector->edid = edid;
>> > -
>> > -   intel_bios_init_panel(dev_priv, &intel_connector->panel,
>> > -                         encoder->devdata, IS_ERR(edid) ? NULL : edid);
>> > +   if (intel_connector->panel.vbt.panel_type == PANEL_TYPE_FALLBACK)
>> > +           intel_bios_init_panel(dev_priv, &intel_connector->panel,
>> > +                                 encoder->devdata, IS_ERR(edid) ? NULL :
>> edid);
>> >
>> >     intel_panel_add_edid_fixed_modes(intel_connector,
>> >                                      intel_connector->panel.vbt.drrs_type
>> != DRRS_TYPE_NONE, diff
>> > --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> > index b972fa6ec00d..4b8413382c5d 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> > @@ -1430,7 +1430,7 @@ void intel_pps_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> >     intel_dp->pps.initializing = true;
>> >     INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&intel_dp->pps.panel_vdd_work,
>> > edp_panel_vdd_work);
>> >
>> > -   if (IS_GEMINILAKE(i915) || IS_BROXTON(i915))
>> > +   if (IS_GEMINILAKE(i915) || IS_BROXTON(i915) || DISPLAY_VER(i915) >=
>> > +12)
>> >             intel_dp->get_pps_idx = bxt_power_sequencer_idx;
>> >     else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
>> >             intel_dp->get_pps_idx = vlv_power_sequencer_pipe;
>> > --
>> > 2.29.0
>>
>> --
>> Ville Syrjälä
>> Intel

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-16 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-16  8:31 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/pps: Add get_pps_idx() hook as part of pps_get_register() cleanup Animesh Manna
2022-09-16  8:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/pps: Enable 2nd pps for dual EDP scenario Animesh Manna
2022-09-16  8:58   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-09-16 11:02     ` Manna, Animesh
2022-09-16 11:29       ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-09-20 13:49         ` Manna, Animesh
2022-09-26 10:35           ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-27 17:53             ` Manna, Animesh
2022-09-16 10:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/pps: Add get_pps_idx() hook as part of pps_get_register() cleanup Patchwork
2022-09-16 14:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-09-27 17:45 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Animesh Manna
2022-09-27 17:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/pps: Enable 2nd pps for dual EDP scenario Animesh Manna
2022-10-04  7:48   ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-10 16:03     ` Manna, Animesh
2022-10-10 15:54 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/pps: Add get_pps_idx() hook as part of pps_get_register() cleanup Animesh Manna
2022-10-10 15:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/pps: Enable 2nd pps for dual EDP scenario Animesh Manna
2022-10-17 13:08   ` Jani Nikula
2022-10-18  8:50     ` Manna, Animesh
2022-10-18  8:39 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/pps: Add get_pps_idx() hook as part of pps_get_register() cleanup Animesh Manna
2022-10-18  8:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/pps: Enable 2nd pps for dual EDP scenario Animesh Manna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r10br1zj.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox