From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: tprevite@gmail.com, paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCHv3] drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 14:14:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfnlm6dw.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220701110309.1237002-1-arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
On Fri, 01 Jul 2022, Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> wrote:
> On linktraining error/timeout before retry need to wait for 400usec as
> per the DP CTS spec1.2
>
> The patch with commit 74ebf294a1dd ("drm/i915: Add a delay in Displayport
> AUX transactions for compliance testing")
> removes this delay mentioning the hardware already meets this requirement,
> but as per the spec the delay mentioned in the spec specifies how long to
> wait for the receiver response before timeout. So the delay here to wait
> for timeout and not a delay after timeout. The DP spec specifies a delay
> after timeout and hence adding this delay.
>
> v2: fixed checkpatch warning and error
> v3: used proper indentation
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Based on the description alone,
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
but would be good if you could get someone to double check the details
against bspec and CTS.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> index 2bc119374555..722c9f210690 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> @@ -286,13 +286,9 @@ intel_dp_aux_xfer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> /*
> * DP CTS 1.2 Core Rev 1.1, 4.2.1.1 & 4.2.1.2
> * 400us delay required for errors and timeouts
> - * Timeout errors from the HW already meet this
> - * requirement so skip to next iteration
> */
> - if (status & DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_ERROR)
> - continue;
> -
> - if (status & DP_AUX_CH_CTL_RECEIVE_ERROR) {
> + if (status & (DP_AUX_CH_CTL_RECEIVE_ERROR |
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_ERROR)) {
> usleep_range(400, 500);
> continue;
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-01 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-27 10:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry Arun R Murthy
2022-06-28 2:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2022-06-28 2:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-06-28 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-07-01 10:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2022-07-01 10:24 ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-07-01 10:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCHv2] " Arun R Murthy
2022-07-01 10:54 ` Jani Nikula
2022-07-01 11:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCHv3] " Arun R Murthy
2022-07-01 11:14 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-07-04 5:24 ` Shankar, Uma
2022-07-04 5:37 ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-07-04 6:31 ` Shankar, Uma
2022-07-01 11:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry (rev2) Patchwork
2022-07-01 12:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry (rev3) Patchwork
2022-07-02 4:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-07-04 7:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry Arun R Murthy
2022-07-04 12:27 ` Shankar, Uma
2022-07-04 14:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-07-04 16:01 ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-07-26 17:04 ` Imre Deak
2022-07-18 11:18 ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-07-19 8:12 ` Shankar, Uma
2022-07-04 18:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry (rev4) Patchwork
2022-07-04 22:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sfnlm6dw.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=tprevite@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox