From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/perf: Consider OA buffer boundary when zeroing out reports
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 23:39:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttv7ykpq.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230616015035.616403-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 18:50:35 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>
> For reports that are not powers of 2, reports at the end of the OA
> buffer may get split across the buffer boundary. When zeroing out such
> reports, take the split into consideration.
>
> Fixes: 09a36015d9a0 ("drm/i915/perf: Clear out entire reports after reading if not power of 2 size")
> Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> index b5491a382bfd..9a8e329c5b5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> @@ -867,8 +867,17 @@ static int gen8_append_oa_reports(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
> oa_report_id_clear(stream, report32);
> oa_timestamp_clear(stream, report32);
> } else {
> + u8 *oa_buf_end = stream->oa_buffer.vaddr +
> + stream->oa_buffer.vma->size;
Probably: "u8 *oa_buf_end = oa_buf_base + OA_BUFFER_SIZE;" ?
We haven't used 'stream->oa_buffer.vma->size' much in this file so I think
better to stick to OA_BUFFER_SIZE.
> + u32 part = (u32)((void *)oa_buf_end - (void *)report32);
This should be sufficient, no need to cast as above I think:
u32 part = oa_buf_end - report32;
or
u32 part = oa_buf_end - report;
> +
> /* Zero out the entire report */
> - memset(report32, 0, report_size);
> + if (report_size <= part) {
> + memset(report32, 0, report_size);
> + } else {
> + memset(report32, 0, part);
> + memset(oa_buf_base, 0, report_size - part);
> + }
Thanks for finding this:
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.36.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-16 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-16 1:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/perf: Consider OA buffer boundary when zeroing out reports Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-06-16 4:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2023-06-16 6:39 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2023-06-16 11:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-06-16 17:34 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-06-16 18:14 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ttv7ykpq.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox