From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
Subject: Re: [v9][PATCH 01/11] drm/i915/display: Add func to get gamma bit precision
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:05:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tv9y6ep0.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87woeu6eqq.fsf@intel.com>
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com> wrote:
>>> Each platform supports different gamma modes and each gamma mode
>>> has different bit precision. Here bit precision corresponds
>>> to number of bits the hw LUT supports.
>>>
>>> Add func per platform to return bit precision corresponding to gamma mode
>>> which will be later used as a parameter in lut comparison function
>>> intel_color_lut_equal().
>>>
>>> This is done for legacy, i965, ilk, glk, icl and their variant platforms.
>>>
>>> v6: -Added func intel_color_get_bit_precision() to get bit precision for
>>> gamma and degamma lut readout depending upon platform and
>>> corresponding to load_luts() [Ankit]
>>> -Made patch11 as patch3 [Jani]
>>> v7: -Renamed func intel_color_get_bit_precision() to
>>> intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision()
>>> -Added separate function/platform for gamma bit precision [Ville]
>>> -Corrected checkpatch warnings
>>> v8: -Split patch 3 into 4 separate patches
>>> v9: -Changed commit message, gave more info [Uma]
>>> -Added precision func for icl+ platform
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Ooops, finger slipped this to the wrong patch. Was supposed to be for
patch 2...
>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>>> index 71a0201..dcc65d7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>>> @@ -1371,6 +1371,105 @@ static int icl_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int i9xx_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode) {
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>>> + return 8;
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>>> + return 16;
>>> + default:
>>> + MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int ilk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + if ((crtc_state->csc_mode & CSC_POSITION_BEFORE_GAMMA) == 0)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode) {
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>>> + return 8;
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>>> + return 10;
>>> + default:
>>> + MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int chv_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> + if (crtc_state->cgm_mode & CGM_PIPE_MODE_GAMMA)
>>> + return 10;
>>> + else
>>> + return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>
>> Why does one branch check for ->gamma_enable and the other not? See below.
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int glk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode) {
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>>> + return 8;
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>>> + return 10;
>>> + default:
>>> + MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int icl_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>
>> Why does this function not check for ->gamma_enable but the others do?
>> See below.
>>
>>> + if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE) == 0)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) {
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>>> + return 8;
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>>> + return 10;
>>> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED:
>>> + return 16;
>>> + default:
>>> + MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
>>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>>> +
>>
>> Should the ->gamma_enable check be here once, instead?
>>
>> With that fixed,
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>
>>> + if (HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) {
>>> + if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>>> + return chv_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> + else
>>> + return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> + } else {
>>> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
>>> + return icl_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> + else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
>>> + return glk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> + else if (IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv))
>>> + return ilk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>>> {
>>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>>> index 057e8ac..0226d3a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>>> @@ -14,5 +14,6 @@
>>> void intel_color_commit(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>> void intel_color_load_luts(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>> void intel_color_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>> +int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>>
>>> #endif /* __INTEL_COLOR_H__ */
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-30 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-30 8:31 [v9][PATCH 00/11] drm/i915: adding state checker for gamma lut values Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 01/11] drm/i915/display: Add func to get gamma bit precision Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 12:02 ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30 12:04 ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30 12:05 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2019-08-30 8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/display: Add debug log for color parameters Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 12:06 ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30 8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/display: Add func to compare hw/sw gamma lut Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 12:47 ` Jani Nikula
2019-09-09 13:53 ` Sharma, Swati2
2019-09-09 14:14 ` Jani Nikula
2019-09-09 14:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-08-30 8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/display: Add macro to compare gamma hw/sw lut Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/display: Extract i9xx_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 12:54 ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30 8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/display: Extract i965_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 13:08 ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30 8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/display: Extract chv_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 13:15 ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30 8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/display: Extract ilk_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 13:18 ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30 8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/display: Extract glk_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/display: Extract icl_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 11/11] FOR_TESTING_ONLY: Print rgb values of hw and sw blobs Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 9:39 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: adding state checker for gamma lut values (rev13) Patchwork
2019-08-30 9:44 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-08-30 10:01 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-08-31 3:01 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tv9y6ep0.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox