Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
Subject: Re: [v9][PATCH 01/11] drm/i915/display: Add func to get gamma bit precision
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:05:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tv9y6ep0.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87woeu6eqq.fsf@intel.com>

On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com> wrote:
>>> Each platform supports different gamma modes and each gamma mode
>>> has different bit precision. Here bit precision corresponds
>>> to number of bits the hw LUT supports.
>>>
>>> Add func per platform to return bit precision corresponding to gamma mode
>>> which will be later used as a parameter in lut comparison function
>>> intel_color_lut_equal().
>>>
>>> This is done for legacy, i965, ilk, glk, icl and their variant platforms.
>>>
>>> v6: -Added func intel_color_get_bit_precision() to get bit precision for
>>>      gamma and degamma lut readout depending upon platform and
>>>      corresponding to load_luts() [Ankit]
>>>     -Made patch11 as patch3 [Jani]
>>> v7: -Renamed func intel_color_get_bit_precision() to
>>>      intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision()
>>>     -Added separate function/platform for gamma bit precision [Ville]
>>>     -Corrected checkpatch warnings
>>> v8: -Split patch 3 into 4 separate patches
>>> v9: -Changed commit message, gave more info [Uma]
>>>     -Added precision func for icl+ platform
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Ooops, finger slipped this to the wrong patch. Was supposed to be for
patch 2...

>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h |  1 +
>>>  2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>>> index 71a0201..dcc65d7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>>> @@ -1371,6 +1371,105 @@ static int icl_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +static int i9xx_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>> +	switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode) {
>>> +	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>>> +		return 8;
>>> +	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>>> +		return 16;
>>> +	default:
>>> +		MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +	}
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int ilk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>> +	if ((crtc_state->csc_mode & CSC_POSITION_BEFORE_GAMMA) == 0)
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>> +	switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode) {
>>> +	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>>> +		return 8;
>>> +	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>>> +		return 10;
>>> +	default:
>>> +		MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +	}
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int chv_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (crtc_state->cgm_mode & CGM_PIPE_MODE_GAMMA)
>>> +		return 10;
>>> +	else
>>> +		return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>
>> Why does one branch check for ->gamma_enable and the other not? See below.
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int glk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (!crtc_state->gamma_enable)
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>> +	switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode) {
>>> +	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>>> +		return 8;
>>> +	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>>> +		return 10;
>>> +	default:
>>> +		MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +	}
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int icl_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>
>> Why does this function not check for ->gamma_enable but the others do?
>> See below.
>>
>>> +	if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE) == 0)
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +
>>> +	switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) {
>>> +	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>>> +		return 8;
>>> +	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>>> +		return 10;
>>> +	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED:
>>> +		return 16;
>>> +	default:
>>> +		MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +	}
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
>>> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>>> +
>>
>> Should the ->gamma_enable check be here once, instead?
>>
>> With that fixed,
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>
>>> +	if (HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) {
>>> +		if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>>> +			return chv_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> +		else
>>> +			return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
>>> +			return icl_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> +		else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
>>> +			return glk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> +		else if (IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv))
>>> +			return ilk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>>> index 057e8ac..0226d3a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.h
>>> @@ -14,5 +14,6 @@
>>>  void intel_color_commit(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>>  void intel_color_load_luts(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>>  void intel_color_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>> +int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>>>  
>>>  #endif /* __INTEL_COLOR_H__ */

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-30 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-30  8:31 [v9][PATCH 00/11] drm/i915: adding state checker for gamma lut values Swati Sharma
2019-08-30  8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 01/11] drm/i915/display: Add func to get gamma bit precision Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 12:02   ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30 12:04     ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30 12:05       ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2019-08-30  8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/display: Add debug log for color parameters Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 12:06   ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30  8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/display: Add func to compare hw/sw gamma lut Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 12:47   ` Jani Nikula
2019-09-09 13:53     ` Sharma, Swati2
2019-09-09 14:14       ` Jani Nikula
2019-09-09 14:19         ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-08-30  8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/display: Add macro to compare gamma hw/sw lut Swati Sharma
2019-08-30  8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/display: Extract i9xx_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 12:54   ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30  8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/display: Extract i965_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 13:08   ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30  8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/display: Extract chv_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 13:15   ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30  8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/display: Extract ilk_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-08-30 13:18   ` Jani Nikula
2019-08-30  8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/display: Extract glk_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-08-30  8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/display: Extract icl_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-08-30  8:31 ` [v9][PATCH 11/11] FOR_TESTING_ONLY: Print rgb values of hw and sw blobs Swati Sharma
2019-08-30  9:39 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: adding state checker for gamma lut values (rev13) Patchwork
2019-08-30  9:44 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-08-30 10:01 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-08-31  3:01 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tv9y6ep0.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox