From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/dsc: stop using interim structure for calculated params
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 18:19:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8jlyd75.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230228113342.2051425-5-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> wrote:
> Stop using an interim structure rc_parameters for storing calculated
> params and then setting drm_dsc_config using that structure. Instead put
> calculated params into the struct drm_dsc_config directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c | 89 +++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> index d5a7e9494b23..1ee8d13c9d64 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> @@ -18,17 +18,6 @@
> #include "intel_qp_tables.h"
> #include "intel_vdsc.h"
>
> -struct rc_parameters {
> - u16 initial_xmit_delay;
> - u8 first_line_bpg_offset;
> - u16 initial_offset;
> - u8 flatness_min_qp;
> - u8 flatness_max_qp;
> - u8 rc_quant_incr_limit0;
> - u8 rc_quant_incr_limit1;
> - struct drm_dsc_rc_range_parameters rc_range_params[DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES];
> -};
> -
> bool intel_dsc_source_support(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> const struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> @@ -63,8 +52,7 @@ static bool is_pipe_dsc(struct intel_crtc *crtc, enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
> }
>
> static void
> -calculate_rc_params(struct rc_parameters *rc,
> - struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg)
> +calculate_rc_params(struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg)
> {
> int bpc = vdsc_cfg->bits_per_component;
> int bpp = vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel >> 4;
> @@ -84,54 +72,54 @@ calculate_rc_params(struct rc_parameters *rc,
> u32 res, buf_i, bpp_i;
>
> if (vdsc_cfg->slice_height >= 8)
> - rc->first_line_bpg_offset =
> + vdsc_cfg->first_line_bpg_offset =
> 12 + DIV_ROUND_UP((9 * min(34, vdsc_cfg->slice_height - 8)), 100);
> else
> - rc->first_line_bpg_offset = 2 * (vdsc_cfg->slice_height - 1);
> + vdsc_cfg->first_line_bpg_offset = 2 * (vdsc_cfg->slice_height - 1);
>
> /* Our hw supports only 444 modes as of today */
> if (bpp >= 12)
> - rc->initial_offset = 2048;
> + vdsc_cfg->initial_offset = 2048;
> else if (bpp >= 10)
> - rc->initial_offset = 5632 - DIV_ROUND_UP(((bpp - 10) * 3584), 2);
> + vdsc_cfg->initial_offset = 5632 - DIV_ROUND_UP(((bpp - 10) * 3584), 2);
> else if (bpp >= 8)
> - rc->initial_offset = 6144 - DIV_ROUND_UP(((bpp - 8) * 512), 2);
> + vdsc_cfg->initial_offset = 6144 - DIV_ROUND_UP(((bpp - 8) * 512), 2);
> else
> - rc->initial_offset = 6144;
> + vdsc_cfg->initial_offset = 6144;
>
> /* initial_xmit_delay = rc_model_size/2/compression_bpp */
> - rc->initial_xmit_delay = DIV_ROUND_UP(DSC_RC_MODEL_SIZE_CONST, 2 * bpp);
> + vdsc_cfg->initial_xmit_delay = DIV_ROUND_UP(DSC_RC_MODEL_SIZE_CONST, 2 * bpp);
>
> - rc->flatness_min_qp = 3 + qp_bpc_modifier;
> - rc->flatness_max_qp = 12 + qp_bpc_modifier;
> + vdsc_cfg->flatness_min_qp = 3 + qp_bpc_modifier;
> + vdsc_cfg->flatness_max_qp = 12 + qp_bpc_modifier;
>
> - rc->rc_quant_incr_limit0 = 11 + qp_bpc_modifier;
> - rc->rc_quant_incr_limit1 = 11 + qp_bpc_modifier;
> + vdsc_cfg->rc_quant_incr_limit0 = 11 + qp_bpc_modifier;
> + vdsc_cfg->rc_quant_incr_limit1 = 11 + qp_bpc_modifier;
>
> bpp_i = (2 * (bpp - 6));
> for (buf_i = 0; buf_i < DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES; buf_i++) {
> /* Read range_minqp and range_max_qp from qp tables */
> - rc->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_min_qp =
> + vdsc_cfg->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_min_qp =
> intel_lookup_range_min_qp(bpc, buf_i, bpp_i);
> - rc->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_max_qp =
> + vdsc_cfg->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_max_qp =
> intel_lookup_range_max_qp(bpc, buf_i, bpp_i);
>
> /* Calculate range_bgp_offset */
> if (bpp <= 6) {
> - rc->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_bpg_offset = ofs_und6[buf_i];
> + vdsc_cfg->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_bpg_offset = ofs_und6[buf_i];
> } else if (bpp <= 8) {
> res = DIV_ROUND_UP(((bpp - 6) * (ofs_und8[buf_i] - ofs_und6[buf_i])), 2);
> - rc->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_bpg_offset =
> + vdsc_cfg->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_bpg_offset =
> ofs_und6[buf_i] + res;
> } else if (bpp <= 12) {
> - rc->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_bpg_offset =
> + vdsc_cfg->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_bpg_offset =
> ofs_und8[buf_i];
> } else if (bpp <= 15) {
> res = DIV_ROUND_UP(((bpp - 12) * (ofs_und15[buf_i] - ofs_und12[buf_i])), 3);
> - rc->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_bpg_offset =
> + vdsc_cfg->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_bpg_offset =
> ofs_und12[buf_i] + res;
> } else {
> - rc->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_bpg_offset =
> + vdsc_cfg->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_bpg_offset =
> ofs_und15[buf_i];
This would benefit from a temp range_bpg_offset variable, assigned to
vdsc_cfg->rc_range_params[buf_i].range_bpg_offset after the if ladder.
> }
> }
> @@ -143,9 +131,6 @@ int intel_dsc_compute_params(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg = &pipe_config->dsc.config;
> u16 compressed_bpp = pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp;
> - const struct rc_parameters *rc_params;
> - struct rc_parameters *rc = NULL;
> - u8 i = 0;
> int ret;
>
> vdsc_cfg->pic_width = pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay;
> @@ -169,43 +154,12 @@ int intel_dsc_compute_params(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> * parameters
> */
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 13) {
> - rc = kmalloc(sizeof(*rc), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!rc)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - calculate_rc_params(rc, vdsc_cfg);
> - rc_params = rc;
> + calculate_rc_params(vdsc_cfg);
> } else {
> ret = drm_dsc_setup_rc_params(vdsc_cfg);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - vdsc_cfg->first_line_bpg_offset = rc_params->first_line_bpg_offset;
> - vdsc_cfg->initial_xmit_delay = rc_params->initial_xmit_delay;
> - vdsc_cfg->initial_offset = rc_params->initial_offset;
> - vdsc_cfg->flatness_min_qp = rc_params->flatness_min_qp;
> - vdsc_cfg->flatness_max_qp = rc_params->flatness_max_qp;
> - vdsc_cfg->rc_quant_incr_limit0 = rc_params->rc_quant_incr_limit0;
> - vdsc_cfg->rc_quant_incr_limit1 = rc_params->rc_quant_incr_limit1;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES; i++) {
> - vdsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_min_qp =
> - rc_params->rc_range_params[i].range_min_qp;
> - vdsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_max_qp =
> - rc_params->rc_range_params[i].range_max_qp;
> - /*
> - * Range BPG Offset uses 2's complement and is only a 6 bits. So
> - * mask it to get only 6 bits.
> - */
> - vdsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_bpg_offset =
> - rc_params->rc_range_params[i].range_bpg_offset &
> - DSC_RANGE_BPG_OFFSET_MASK;
This masking needs to be added to the loop in
calculate_rc_params(). With the temp variable I suggested above, it
could be done while assigning.
With that fixed,
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Also, this is awesome stuff, thanks!
> - }
> -
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 13) {
> if (compressed_bpp == 6 &&
> vdsc_cfg->bits_per_component == 8)
> vdsc_cfg->rc_quant_incr_limit1 = 23;
> @@ -215,7 +169,6 @@ int intel_dsc_compute_params(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> vdsc_cfg->rc_range_params[0].range_bpg_offset = 0;
> }
>
> -out:
> /*
> * BitsPerComponent value determines mux_word_size:
> * When BitsPerComponent is less than or 10bpc, muxWordSize will be equal to
> @@ -230,8 +183,6 @@ int intel_dsc_compute_params(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> vdsc_cfg->initial_scale_value = (vdsc_cfg->rc_model_size << 3) /
> (vdsc_cfg->rc_model_size - vdsc_cfg->initial_offset);
>
> - kfree(rc);
> -
> return 0;
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-28 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-28 11:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: move DSC RC tables to drm_dsc_helper.c Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915/dsc: change DSC param tables to follow the DSC model Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 15:56 ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-28 16:10 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915/dsc: move rc_buf_thresh values to common helper Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 12:24 ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-28 12:35 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 12:49 ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-28 13:02 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 16:01 ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-28 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915/dsc: move DSC tables to DRM DSC helper Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 14:49 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-28 15:10 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-28 16:11 ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-28 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/dsc: stop using interim structure for calculated params Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 16:19 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-02-28 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/display/dsc: use flat array for rc_parameters lookup Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 16:28 ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-28 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/display/dsc: split DSC 1.2 and DSC 1.1 (pre-SCR) parameters Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 16:33 ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-28 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] drm/display/dsc: include the rest of pre-SCR parameters Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 16:31 ` Jani Nikula
2023-03-07 13:37 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/display/dsc: add YCbCr 4:2:2 and 4:2:0 RC parameters Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/display/dsc: add helper to set semi-const parameters Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/msm/dsi: use new helpers for DSC setup Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-02-28 12:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: move DSC RC tables to drm_dsc_helper.c Patchwork
2023-02-28 12:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v8jlyd75.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox