From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 44/80] docs: gpu: i915.rst: Fix several C duplication warnings
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:50:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9fa9yq9.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8dce8bc0-c83b-c256-aa35-229d4d583f74@intel.com>
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020, Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> wrote:
> On 16/10/2020 14:37, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:01:07 +0300
>> Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> escreveu:
>>
>>> + Lionel
>>>
>>> Can you please take a look at best resolving the below problem.
>>>
>>> Maybe we should eliminate the duplicate declarations? Updating such
>>> a list manually seems error prone to me.
>> For Kernel 5.10, IMO the best is to apply this patch as-is, as any
>> other thing would need to be postponed, and we want 5.10 free of
>> doc warnings.
>
>
> That's odd... Most of the functions are documented. Is it that we're
> missing the "()" after the function name maybe?
The problem is we first include named functions, and then go on to
include everything again, duplicating the documentation for the named
functions.
BR,
Jani.
>
>
> -Lionel
>
>
>>
>> Yet, when I wrote this one, I almost took a different approach:
>> to implement something like @*group (or \*group) directives that
>> exists on doxygen:
>>
>> https://www.doxygen.nl/manual/grouping.html
>>
>> If something like that gets added to kernel-doc syntax, then
>> one could do something like:
>>
>> /**
>> * DOC: some foo description
>> * @group foo
>> */
>>
>> /**
>> * foo1 - do some foo things
>> * @group foo
>> ...
>> */
>>
>> /**
>> * foo2 - do some other foo things
>> * @group foo
>> ...
>> */
>>
>> /**
>> * bar - do bar things
>> * @group bar
>> ...
>> */
>>
>>
>> And then, at kernel-doc markup:
>>
>> FOO
>> ===
>>
>> .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
>> :group: foo
>>
>>
>> BAR
>> ===
>> .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
>> :group: bar
>>
>>
>> I suspect that something like that would be a lot easier to maintain.
>>
>> Once having someone like that implemented, it should be easy to also
>> have something like this:
>>
>> OTHERS
>> ======
>> .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
>> :export:
>> :not-grouped:
>>
>> in order to pick other functions that aren't grouped.
>>
>> I suspect that implementing something like that at kernel-doc.pl
>> won't be hard.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mauro
>>
>>> Regards, Joonas
>>>
>>> Quoting Mauro Carvalho Chehab (2020-10-13 14:53:59)
>>>> As reported by Sphinx:
>>>>
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1147: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_oa_wait_unlocked'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1169: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_oa_poll_wait'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1189: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_oa_read'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:2669: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_oa_stream_enable'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:2734: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_oa_stream_disable'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:2820: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_oa_stream_init'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3010: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_read'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3098: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_poll_locked'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3129: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_poll'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3152: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_enable_locked'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3181: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_disable_locked'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3273: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_ioctl'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3296: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_destroy_locked'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3321: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_release'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3379: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_open_ioctl_locked'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3534: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'read_properties_unlocked'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3717: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_open_ioctl'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3760: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_register'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:3789: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_unregister'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:4009: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_add_config_ioctl'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:4162: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_remove_config_ioctl'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:4260: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_init'.
>>>> ./Documentation/gpu/i915:646: ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:4423: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined in 'gpu/i915'.
>>>> Declaration is 'i915_perf_fini'.
>>>>
>>>> With Sphinx 3, C declarations can't be duplicated anymore,
>>>> so let's exclude those from the other internals found on
>>>> i915_perf.c file.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/gpu/i915.rst | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/i915.rst b/Documentation/gpu/i915.rst
>>>> index 33cc6ddf8f64..cff1f154b473 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/gpu/i915.rst
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/i915.rst
>>>> @@ -636,15 +636,36 @@ i915 Perf Observation Architecture Stream
>>>> .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
>>>> :functions: i915_oa_poll_wait
>>>>
>>>> -All i915 Perf Internals
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> +Other i915 Perf Internals
>>>> +-------------------------
>>>>
>>>> -This section simply includes all currently documented i915 perf internals, in
>>>> -no particular order, but may include some more minor utilities or platform
>>>> +This section simply includes all other currently documented i915 perf internals,
>>>> +in no particular order, but may include some more minor utilities or platform
>>>> specific details than found in the more high-level sections.
>>>>
>>>> .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
>>>> :internal:
>>>> + :no-identifiers:
>>>> + i915_perf_init
>>>> + i915_perf_fini
>>>> + i915_perf_register
>>>> + i915_perf_unregister
>>>> + i915_perf_open_ioctl
>>>> + i915_perf_release
>>>> + i915_perf_add_config_ioctl
>>>> + i915_perf_remove_config_ioctl
>>>> + read_properties_unlocked
>>>> + i915_perf_open_ioctl_locked
>>>> + i915_perf_destroy_locked
>>>> + i915_perf_read i915_perf_ioctl
>>>> + i915_perf_enable_locked
>>>> + i915_perf_disable_locked
>>>> + i915_perf_poll i915_perf_poll_locked
>>>> + i915_oa_stream_init i915_oa_read
>>>> + i915_oa_stream_enable
>>>> + i915_oa_stream_disable
>>>> + i915_oa_wait_unlocked
>>>> + i915_oa_poll_wait
>>>>
>>>> Style
>>>> =====
>>>> --
>>>> 2.26.2
>>>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mauro
>
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-16 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1602589096.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2020-10-13 11:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 44/80] docs: gpu: i915.rst: Fix several C duplication warnings Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-10-16 11:01 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2020-10-16 11:37 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-10-16 11:39 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2020-10-16 11:50 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-10-16 12:02 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2020-10-16 12:03 ` Lionel Landwerlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9fa9yq9.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox