From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: add basic selftests for rc6
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:31:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9ol9kcl.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200205105749.1769982-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
>
> Add three basic tests for rc6 power status:
>
> 1. live_rc6_basic - simply checks if rc6 works when it's enabled
> or stops when it's disabled.
>
> 2. live_rc6_threshold - rc6 should not work when the evaluation
> interval is less than the threshold and should work otherwise.
>
> 3. live_rc6_busy - keeps the gpu busy and then goes in idle;
> checks that we don't fall in rc6 when busy and that we do fall
> in rc6 when idling.
>
> The three tests are added as sutest of the bigger live_late_gt_pm
> selftest.
>
> The basic rc6 functionality is tested by checking the reference
> counter within the evaluation interval.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.h | 2 +
> 3 files changed, 177 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c
> index 09ff8e4f88af..5c7b92301a14 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_gt_pm.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ int intel_gt_pm_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> {
> static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
> SUBTEST(live_rc6_manual),
> + SUBTEST(live_rc6_threshold),
> + SUBTEST(live_rc6_busy),
> SUBTEST(live_gt_resume),
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.c
> index 5f7e2dcf5686..92375f458845 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include "selftest_rc6.h"
>
> #include "selftests/i915_random.h"
> +#include "selftests/igt_spinner.h"
>
> int live_rc6_manual(void *arg)
> {
> @@ -202,3 +203,175 @@ int live_rc6_ctx_wa(void *arg)
> kfree(engines);
> return err;
> }
> +
> +static bool test_rc6(struct intel_rc6 *rc6, bool enabled)
> +{
> + struct intel_uncore *uncore = rc6_to_uncore(rc6);
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> + u32 ec1, ec2;
> + u32 interval;
> +
> + wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(uncore->rpm);
> +
> + interval = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RC_EVALUATION_INTERVAL);
> +
> + /*
> + * the interval is stored in steps of 1.28us
> + */
> + interval = div_u64(mul_u32_u32(interval, 128),
> + 100 * 1000); /* => miliseconds */
> +
s/miliseconds/milliseconds.
I have a faint memory that the interval was not always 1.28us
but gen dependant.
> + ec1 = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_GT_GFX_RC6);
> +
> + /*
> + * It's not important to precisely wait the interval time.
> + * I'll wait at least twice the time in order to be sure
> + * that the counting happens in the reference counter.
> + */
> + msleep(2 * interval);
> +
> + ec2 = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_GT_GFX_RC6);
> +
> + pr_info("interval:%x [%dms], threshold:%x, rc6:%x, enabled?:%s\n",
> + intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RC_EVALUATION_INTERVAL),
> + interval,
> + intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RC6_THRESHOLD),
> + ec2 - ec1,
> + yesno(enabled));
> +
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(uncore->rpm, wakeref);
> +
> + return enabled != (ec1 >= ec2);
Wrap?
> +}
> +
> +int live_rc6_threshold(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> + struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
> + struct intel_rc6 *rc6 = >->rc6;
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> + u32 threshold, interval;
> + u32 t_orig, i_orig;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + if (!rc6->manual) /* No interferring PCU! */
> + return 0;
> +
> + wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(uncore->rpm);
> +
> + __intel_rc6_disable(rc6); /* stop before adjusting thresholds */
> +
> + t_orig = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RC6_THRESHOLD);
> + i_orig = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RC_EVALUATION_INTERVAL);
> +
> + /*
> + * set the threshold to 50ms
> + *
> + * 50ms * 1000 = 50000us
> + * 50000 / (1.28 * 100) / 100 (we don't have floating point)
> + */
> + threshold = 50 * 1000 / 128 * 100;
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RC6_THRESHOLD, threshold);
> +
> + /* set interval indicatively to half the threshold */
> + interval = threshold / 2;
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RC_EVALUATION_INTERVAL, interval);
> +
> + intel_rc6_unpark(rc6);
> +
> + /* interval < threshold */
> + if (!test_rc6(rc6, false)) {
consider removing the assertion of 'activeness' in parameter
and just if (!rc6_active(rc6)). Or am I missing something in here?
-Mika
> + pr_err("i915 mismatch: rc6 with interval < threshold\n");
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + __intel_rc6_disable(rc6);
> +
> + /* set interval indicatively to twice the threshold */
> + interval = threshold * 2;
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RC_EVALUATION_INTERVAL, interval);
> +
> + intel_rc6_unpark(rc6);
> +
> + /* interval > threshold */
> + if (!test_rc6(rc6, true)) {
> + pr_err("i915 mismatch: not in rc6 with interval > threshold\n");
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + __intel_rc6_disable(rc6);
> +
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RC6_THRESHOLD, t_orig);
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RC_EVALUATION_INTERVAL, i_orig);
> +
> + intel_rc6_park(rc6);
> +
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(uncore->rpm, wakeref);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +int live_rc6_busy(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> + struct intel_rc6 *rc6 = >->rc6;
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> + struct igt_spinner spin;
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> + enum intel_engine_id id;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!rc6->supported)
> + return 0;
> +
> + err = igt_spinner_init(&spin, gt);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(gt->uncore->rpm);
> + for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
> + struct i915_request *rq;
> +
> + rq = igt_spinner_create_request(&spin,
> + engine->kernel_context,
> + MI_NOOP);
> + if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(rq);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + i915_request_get(rq);
> + i915_request_add(rq);
> +
> + igt_wait_for_spinner(&spin, rq); /* it's enough waiting */
> +
> + /* gpu is busy, we shouldn't be in rc6 */
> + if (!test_rc6(rc6, false)) {
> + pr_err("%s: never busy enough for having a nap\n",
> + engine->name);
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + igt_spinner_end(&spin);
> + if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 5) < 0)
> + err = -ETIME;
> + i915_request_put(rq);
> + if (err)
> + break;
> +
> + intel_gt_wait_for_idle(gt, HZ / 5);
> + intel_gt_pm_wait_for_idle(gt);
> +
> + /* gpu is idle, we should be in rc6 */
> + if (!test_rc6(rc6, true)) {
> + pr_err("%s is idle but doesn't go in rc6\n",
> + engine->name);
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(gt->uncore->rpm, wakeref);
> +
> + igt_spinner_fini(&spin);
> + return err;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.h
> index 762fd442d7b2..312894423dc2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.h
> @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@
> #ifndef SELFTEST_RC6_H
> #define SELFTEST_RC6_H
>
> +int live_rc6_busy(void *arg);
> int live_rc6_ctx_wa(void *arg);
> int live_rc6_manual(void *arg);
> +int live_rc6_threshold(void *arg);
>
> #endif /* SELFTEST_RC6_H */
> --
> 2.25.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-05 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-05 10:57 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: add basic selftests for rc6 Chris Wilson
2020-02-05 14:31 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2020-02-05 18:40 ` Andi Shyti
2020-02-05 21:21 ` Chris Wilson
2020-02-06 12:15 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-02-05 15:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/selftests: add basic selftests for rc6 (rev5) Patchwork
2020-02-05 15:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-11-22 0:16 [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: add basic selftests for rc6 Chris Wilson
2019-11-22 0:16 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-22 0:19 ` Chris Wilson
2019-11-22 0:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9ol9kcl.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox