From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/pmu: hide struct i915_pmu
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 18:47:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wmv014rc.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9941f1d6-8466-4c69-8b06-34177a658299@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, 02 Nov 2023, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 02/11/2023 15:42, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> The implementation details of pmu should be implementation details
>> hidden inside i915_pmu.c. Make it so.
>
> Don't tell me i915->pmu bothers xe somehow?
It doesn't bother xe, it bothers me...
> I am not a fan of the series
> on a glance. Replacing an increment with a function call for instance.
I think you glanced at the wart of this series. ;)
It just bugs me that we expose a plethora of data that should be
internal to pmu, basically just for that one increment.
And we pull in a bunch of headers to define struct i915_pmu, and then we
implicitly depend on those headers in a ton of places through incredible
chains of includes.
And we rebuild everything and a half when those headers change. Or when
the pmu implementation details change.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>
>> Jani Nikula (5):
>> drm/i915/pmu: report irqs to pmu code
>> drm/i915/pmu: convert one more container_of() to event_to_pmu()
>> drm/i915/pmu: change attr_group allocation and initialization
>> drm/i915/pmu: hide struct i915_pmu inside i915_pmu.c
>> drm/i915: add a number of explicit includes to avoid implicit ones
>>
>> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 1 +
>> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c | 1 +
>> .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 2 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_migrate.c | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c | 2 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 5 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 6 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 216 ++++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h | 138 +----------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_mmap.c | 2 +
>> .../drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c | 1 +
>> 16 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-02 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-02 15:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/pmu: hide struct i915_pmu Jani Nikula
2023-11-02 15:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/pmu: report irqs to pmu code Jani Nikula
2023-11-02 15:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/pmu: convert one more container_of() to event_to_pmu() Jani Nikula
2023-11-02 15:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/pmu: change attr_group allocation and initialization Jani Nikula
2023-11-02 15:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/pmu: hide struct i915_pmu inside i915_pmu.c Jani Nikula
2023-11-02 15:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: add a number of explicit includes to avoid implicit ones Jani Nikula
2023-11-02 15:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915/pmu: hide struct i915_pmu Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-11-02 16:47 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-11-03 11:06 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-11-07 11:29 ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-02 23:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wmv014rc.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox