From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [core-for-CI] x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel Hybrid platform
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 18:59:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wn3050kz.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230327121116.1785979-1-imre.deak@intel.com>
On Mon, 27 Mar 2023, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
>
> The SMT siblings value returned by CPUID.1F SMT level EBX differs
> among CPUs on Intel Hybrid platforms like AlderLake and MeteorLake.
> It returns 2 for Pcore CPUs which have SMT siblings and returns 1 for
> Ecore CPUs which do not have SMT siblings.
>
> Today, the CPU boot code sets the global variable smp_num_siblings when
> every CPU thread is brought up. The last thread to boot will overwrite
> it with the number of siblings of *that* thread. That last thread to
> boot will "win". If the thread is a Pcore, smp_num_siblings == 2. If it
> is an Ecore, smp_num_siblings == 1.
>
> smp_num_siblings describes if the *system* supports SMT. It should
> specify the maximum number of SMT threads among all cores.
>
> Ensure that smp_num_siblings represents the system-wide maximum number
> of siblings by always increasing its value. Never allow it to decrease.
>
> On MeteorLake-P platform, this fixes a problem that the Ecore CPUs are
> not updated in any cpu sibling map because the system is treated as an
> UP system when probing Ecore CPUs.
>
> Below shows part of the CPU topology information before and after the
> fix, for both Pcore and Ecore CPU (cpu0 is Pcore, cpu 12 is Ecore).
> ...
> -/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/package_cpus:000fff
> -/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/package_cpus_list:0-11
> +/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/package_cpus:3fffff
> +/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/package_cpus_list:0-21
> ...
> -/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/topology/package_cpus:001000
> -/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/topology/package_cpus_list:12
> +/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/topology/package_cpus:3fffff
> +/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/topology/package_cpus_list:0-21
>
> And this also breaks userspace tools like lscpu
> -Core(s) per socket: 1
> -Socket(s): 11
> +Core(s) per socket: 16
> +Socket(s): 1
>
> CC: stable@kernel.org
> Fixes: bbb65d2d365e ("x86: use cpuid vector 0xb when available for detecting cpu topology")
> Fixes: 95f3d39ccf7a ("x86/cpu/topology: Provide detect_extended_topology_early()")
> Suggested-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> [Imre: resend for core-for-CI]
> References: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230323015640.27906-1-rui.zhang@intel.com
> References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8317
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Pushed to topic/core-for-CI as a stopgap measure.
BR,
Jani.
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
> index 5e868b62a7c4e..0270925fe013b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ int detect_extended_topology_early(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> * initial apic id, which also represents 32-bit extended x2apic id.
> */
> c->initial_apicid = edx;
> - smp_num_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx);
> + smp_num_siblings = max_t(int, smp_num_siblings, LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx));
> #endif
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ int detect_extended_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> */
> cpuid_count(leaf, SMT_LEVEL, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> c->initial_apicid = edx;
> - core_level_siblings = smp_num_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx);
> + core_level_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx);
> + smp_num_siblings = max_t(int, smp_num_siblings, LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx));
> core_plus_mask_width = ht_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
> die_level_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx);
> pkg_mask_width = die_plus_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-28 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-27 12:11 [Intel-gfx] [core-for-CI] x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel Hybrid platform Imre Deak
2023-03-27 12:46 ` Saarinen, Jani
2023-03-27 18:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2023-03-27 19:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-03-27 21:26 ` Imre Deak
2023-03-28 1:14 ` Zhang, Rui
2023-03-28 1:57 ` Zhang, Rui
2023-03-28 6:34 ` Saarinen, Jani
2023-03-28 6:47 ` Saarinen, Jani
2023-03-28 7:23 ` Imre Deak
2023-03-28 8:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for x86/topology: fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel Hybrid platform (rev2) Patchwork
2023-03-28 8:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-03-28 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2023-03-28 15:59 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wn3050kz.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox