Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Murthy, Arun R" <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/display: move more scanline functions to intel_vblank.[ch]
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 11:12:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wn6tuj1x.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB31777C066D99AFF73AD5D956BAE19@DM6PR11MB3177.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, "Murthy, Arun R" <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2022 2:45 PM
>> To: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>; intel-
>> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/display: move more scanline
>> functions to intel_vblank.[ch]
>>
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2022, "Murthy, Arun R" <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> wrote:
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf
>> >> Of Jani Nikula
>> >> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 7:59 PM
>> >> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> >> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> >> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/display: move more scanline
>> >> functions to intel_vblank.[ch]
>> >>
>> >> Reduce clutter in intel_display.c by moving the scanline
>> >> moving/stopped wait functions to intel_vblank.[ch].
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 36
>> >> +------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c  |
>> >> 35 +++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.h  |
>> >> 2 ++
>> >>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> >> index 6cdfdae2c712..0cdb514d7ee0 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> >> @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@
>> >>  #include "intel_quirks.h"
>> >>  #include "intel_sprite.h"
>> >>  #include "intel_tc.h"
>> >> +#include "intel_vblank.h"
>> >>  #include "intel_vga.h"
>> >>  #include "i9xx_plane.h"
>> >>  #include "skl_scaler.h"
>> >> @@ -386,41 +387,6 @@ struct intel_crtc *intel_master_crtc(const
>> >> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> >>               return to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >> -static bool pipe_scanline_is_moving(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> >> -                                 enum pipe pipe)
>> >> -{
>> >> -     i915_reg_t reg = PIPEDSL(pipe);
>> >> -     u32 line1, line2;
>> >> -
>> >> -     line1 = intel_de_read(dev_priv, reg) & PIPEDSL_LINE_MASK;
>> >> -     msleep(5);
>> >> -     line2 = intel_de_read(dev_priv, reg) & PIPEDSL_LINE_MASK;
>> >> -
>> >> -     return line1 != line2;
>> >> -}
>> >> -
>> >> -static void wait_for_pipe_scanline_moving(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> >> bool state) -{
>> >> -     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>> >> -     enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>> >> -
>> >> -     /* Wait for the display line to settle/start moving */
>> >> -     if (wait_for(pipe_scanline_is_moving(dev_priv, pipe) == state, 100))
>> >> -             drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
>> >> -                     "pipe %c scanline %s wait timed out\n",
>> >> -                     pipe_name(pipe), str_on_off(state));
>> >> -}
>> >> -
>> >> -static void intel_wait_for_pipe_scanline_stopped(struct intel_crtc *crtc) -{
>> >> -     wait_for_pipe_scanline_moving(crtc, false);
>> >> -}
>> >> -
>> >> -static void intel_wait_for_pipe_scanline_moving(struct intel_crtc *crtc) -{
>> >> -     wait_for_pipe_scanline_moving(crtc, true);
>> >> -}
>> >> -
>> >>  static void
>> >>  intel_wait_for_pipe_off(const struct intel_crtc_state
>> >> *old_crtc_state)  { diff -- git
>> >> a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
>> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
>> >> index 78a579496ad1..f25ec643a0a3 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
>> >> @@ -417,3 +417,38 @@ int intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct intel_crtc
>> >> *crtc)
>> >>
>> >>       return position;
>> >>  }
>> >> +
>> >> +static bool pipe_scanline_is_moving(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> >> +                                 enum pipe pipe) {
>> >> +     i915_reg_t reg = PIPEDSL(pipe);
>> >> +     u32 line1, line2;
>> >> +
>> >> +     line1 = intel_de_read(dev_priv, reg) & PIPEDSL_LINE_MASK;
>> >> +     msleep(5);
>> >> +     line2 = intel_de_read(dev_priv, reg) & PIPEDSL_LINE_MASK;
>> >> +
>> >> +     return line1 != line2;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static void wait_for_pipe_scanline_moving(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> >> +bool
>> >> +state) {
>> >> +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>> >> +     enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>> >> +
>> >> +     /* Wait for the display line to settle/start moving */
>> >> +     if (wait_for(pipe_scanline_is_moving(dev_priv, pipe) == state, 100))
>> >> +             drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
>> >> +                     "pipe %c scanline %s wait timed out\n",
>> >> +                     pipe_name(pipe), str_on_off(state)); }
>> >> +
>> >> +void intel_wait_for_pipe_scanline_stopped(struct intel_crtc *crtc) {
>> >> +     wait_for_pipe_scanline_moving(crtc, false); }
>> >> +
>> > Is this wrapper function required, since nothing else is being other
>> > than calling the function wait_for_pipe_scanline_moving, can this be
>> > replaced?
>>
>> Well, first, this patch is only about code *movement*. Any changes like that
>> would have to be separate.
>>
> Ok.
> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
>
>> And how would you propose to drop the wrapper? The wrappers are all
>> about readability in the caller side:
>>
> I didn’t mean to drop the wrapper, understand that wrapper is more readable, what I meant is to replace wait_for_pipe_scanline_moving/stopped with its function contents.

Why should we duplicate the code?

BR,
Jani.

>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Arun R Murthy
> --------------------
>> intel_wait_for_pipe_scanline_stopped(crtc)
>>
>> vs.
>>
>> intel_wait_for_pipe_scanline_moving(crtc, false)
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks and Regards,
>> > Arun R Murthy
>> > --------------------
>> >
>> >> +void intel_wait_for_pipe_scanline_moving(struct intel_crtc *crtc) {
>> >> +     wait_for_pipe_scanline_moving(crtc, true); }
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.h
>> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.h
>> >> index 9c0034d7454d..54870cabd734 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.h
>> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.h
>> >> @@ -17,5 +17,7 @@ u32 g4x_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
>> >> bool intel_crtc_get_vblank_timestamp(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int
>> *max_error,
>> >>                                    ktime_t *vblank_time, bool
>> >> in_vblank_irq); int intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>> >> +void intel_wait_for_pipe_scanline_stopped(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>> >> +void intel_wait_for_pipe_scanline_moving(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>> >>
>> >>  #endif /* __INTEL_VBLANK_H__ */
>> >> --
>> >> 2.34.1
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-15  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-12 14:29 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: extract vblank/scanline code to a separate file Jani Nikula
2022-12-12 14:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/irq: split out vblank/scanline code to intel_vblank.[ch] Jani Nikula
2022-12-12 14:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/display: move more scanline functions " Jani Nikula
2022-12-14  4:15   ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-14  9:15     ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-15  2:11       ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-15  9:12         ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-12-15  9:59           ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-15 10:20             ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-15 10:39               ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-15 11:03                 ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-12 14:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/display: use common function for checking scanline is moving Jani Nikula
2022-12-14  4:01   ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-12 14:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/hdmi: abstract scanline range wait into intel_vblank.[ch] Jani Nikula
2022-12-14  4:17   ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-14 14:16   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-12-12 14:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/vblank: use intel_de_read() Jani Nikula
2022-12-14  4:05   ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-12 14:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/vblank: add and use intel_de_read64_2x32() to read vblank counter Jani Nikula
2022-12-12 14:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/reg: split out vblank/scanline regs Jani Nikula
2022-12-14  4:24   ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-14 13:42   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-12-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: extract vblank/scanline code to a separate file Patchwork
2022-12-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-12-12 15:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-12-14  4:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] " Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-14  9:18   ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-15  2:05     ` Murthy, Arun R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wn6tuj1x.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox