From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>,
"Chiou, Cooper" <cooper.chiou@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Chiou, Cooper" <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/edid: filter DisplayID v2.0 CTA block in audio detection
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 12:40:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnglhrzc.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB271097CC39080E466B5C38E5A3189@BYAPR11MB2710.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 23, 2022 6:04 PM, Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote :
>>On Mon, 21 Mar 2022, Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com> wrote:
>>> In DisplayID v2.0 CTS data block 0x81 case, there is no any audio
>>> information definition, but drm_detect_monitor_audio didn't filter it
>>> so that it caused eDP dummy audio card be detected improperly.
>>>
>>> We observed this issue on some AUO/BOE eDP panel with DID v2.0 CTA
>>> block, and fix issue by adding filter for edid_ext[0]=DATA_BLOCK_CTA
>>> case.
>>
>>Out of curiosity, what does the CTA DisplayID Data Block have for Data Block revision?
>>
>>I haven't found any mention anywhere that it should have any correspondence to the CEA *extension* revision number, which is supposed to be 1..3, and really only 3 for about a decade now.
>>
>>Both the DisplayID v1.3 and v2.0 specs only mention revision 0.
>>
>>BR,
>>Jani.
>>
>
> We don't get many issues in EDID with DisplayID structure. In this case, the revision number is "0" as well.
> As you mentioned, DisplayID v1.3 and v2.0 spec define the block revision value is always 0. Do you think it would cause any problem?
A lot of places in the EDID parser expect CEA revision >= 3. This isn't
true for DisplayID data blocks, so we end up skipping a bunch of stuff
if there's no CEA extension and only a DisplayID block.
I'm fixing this in my series.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Best regards,
> Shawn
>
>>>
>>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Shawn C Lee <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>>> index f5f5de362ff2..6c9ae4b130bd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
>>> @@ -4845,7 +4845,7 @@ bool drm_detect_monitor_audio(struct edid *edid)
>>> int start_offset, end_offset;
>>>
>>> edid_ext = drm_find_cea_extension(edid);
>>> - if (!edid_ext)
>>> + if (!edid_ext || (edid_ext[0] == DATA_BLOCK_CTA))
>>> goto end;
>>>
>>> has_audio = ((edid_ext[3] & EDID_BASIC_AUDIO) != 0);
>>
>>--
>>Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-23 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-21 4:43 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/edid: filter DisplayID v2.0 CTA block in audio detection Cooper Chiou
2022-03-21 4:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2022-03-21 5:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-21 7:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-03-21 9:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2022-03-23 5:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [v2] drm/edid: check basic audio support on CEA extension block Lee Shawn C
2022-03-23 9:40 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-23 5:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/edid: filter DisplayID v2.0 CTA block in audio detection (rev2) Patchwork
2022-03-23 6:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-23 9:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-03-23 10:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/edid: filter DisplayID v2.0 CTA block in audio detection Jani Nikula
2022-03-23 10:31 ` Lee, Shawn C
2022-03-23 10:40 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-03-23 13:35 ` Lee, Shawn C
2022-03-24 6:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [v3] drm/edid: check basic audio support on CEA extension block Lee Shawn C
2022-03-24 6:16 ` Lee Shawn C
2022-03-24 9:57 ` Jani Nikula
2022-03-24 6:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/edid: filter DisplayID v2.0 CTA block in audio detection (rev4) Patchwork
2022-03-24 6:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-24 7:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wnglhrzc.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=cooper.chiou@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shawn.c.lee@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox