From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/fbc: switch to intel_de_* register accessors in display code
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 12:44:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgcf48ld.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y39NBXNDDwwq4sKj@intel.com>
On Thu, 24 Nov 2022, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 11:18:25PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Avoid direct uncore use in display code. Use the new
>> intel_de_rewrite_fw().
>>
>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 10 ++--------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>> index b5ee5ea0d010..6066ac412e6f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
>> @@ -323,10 +323,7 @@ static void i8xx_fbc_nuke(struct intel_fbc *fbc)
>> enum i9xx_plane_id i9xx_plane = fbc_state->plane->i9xx_plane;
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = fbc->i915;
>>
>> - spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
>> - intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSPADDR(i9xx_plane),
>> - intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, DSPADDR(i9xx_plane)));
>> - spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
>> + intel_de_rewrite_fw(dev_priv, DSPADDR(i9xx_plane));
>
> intel_de_rewrite_fw() seems to imply some kind of atomicicity guarantee
> here. But that entirely depends on whether the other writers of this
> register also protect it with unore.lock. So just a misleading illusion.
>
> That said, this locking stuff shouldn't even be needed since
> commit de5bd083d247 ("drm/i915/fbc: Skip nuke when flip is pending")
> commit 7cfd1a18c5f9 ("drm/i915: Remove remaining locks from i9xx plane udpates")
So instead just drop the whole intel_de_rewrite_fw() thing and the
locking around the rewrite here?
BR,
Jani.
>
>> }
>>
>> static void i8xx_fbc_program_cfb(struct intel_fbc *fbc)
>> @@ -359,10 +356,7 @@ static void i965_fbc_nuke(struct intel_fbc *fbc)
>> enum i9xx_plane_id i9xx_plane = fbc_state->plane->i9xx_plane;
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = fbc->i915;
>>
>> - spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
>> - intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSPSURF(i9xx_plane),
>> - intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, DSPSURF(i9xx_plane)));
>> - spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
>> + intel_de_rewrite_fw(dev_priv, DSPSURF(i9xx_plane));
>> }
>>
>> static const struct intel_fbc_funcs i965_fbc_funcs = {
>> --
>> 2.34.1
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-25 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-23 21:18 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] drm/i915/display: switch to intel_de_* register accessors Jani Nikula
2022-11-23 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915/de: Add more macros to remove all direct calls to uncore Jani Nikula
2022-11-23 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/de: return the old register value from intel_de_rmw() Jani Nikula
2022-11-23 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915/crt: drop a bunch of unnecessary register variables Jani Nikula
2022-11-23 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/crt: switch to intel_de_* register accessors in display code Jani Nikula
2022-11-23 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915/power: " Jani Nikula
2022-11-23 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915/dmc: " Jani Nikula
2022-11-23 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/dp-aux: " Jani Nikula
2022-11-23 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915/gmbus: " Jani Nikula
2022-11-23 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915/wm: " Jani Nikula
2022-11-23 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915/snps: " Jani Nikula
2022-11-23 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915/tc: " Jani Nikula
2022-11-23 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/fbc: " Jani Nikula
2022-11-24 10:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-11-25 10:44 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-11-23 22:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/display: switch to intel_de_* register accessors Patchwork
2022-11-23 23:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zgcf48ld.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox