Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Improve the start alignment of bonded pairs

[Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>]

Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> Always wait on the start of the signaler request to reduce the problem
> of dequeueing the bonded pair too early -- we want both payloads to
> start at the same time, with no latency, and yet still allow others to
> make full use of the slack in the system.
>
> Remindme: add testcases for starting the bonded pair too early due to an
> infinite spin before the signaler, and via a semaphore.
>
> Testcase: XXX
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> index 4bfe68edfc81..c0a0089111a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> @@ -1127,14 +1127,37 @@ __i915_request_await_execution(struct i915_request *to,
>  					  &from->fence))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	/* Ensure both start together [after all semaphores in signal] */
> -	if (intel_engine_has_semaphores(to->engine))
> -		err = __emit_semaphore_wait(to, from, from->fence.seqno - 1);
> -	else
> -		err = i915_request_await_start(to, from);
> +	/*
> +	 * Wait until the start of this request.
> +	 *
> +	 * The execution cb fires when we submit the request to HW. But in
> +	 * many cases this may be long before the request itself is ready to
> +	 * run (consider that we submit 2 requests for the same context, where
> +	 * the request of interest is behind an indefinite spinner). So we hook
> +	 * up to both to reduce our queues tidy and execution lag minimised in
> +	 * the worst case, though we hope that the await_start is elided.
> +	 */
> +	err = i915_request_await_start(to, from);
>  	if (err < 0)
>  		return err;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Ensure both start together [after all semaphores in signal]
> +	 *
> +	 * Now that we are queued to the HW at roughly the same time (thanks
> +	 * to the execute cb) and are ready to run at roughly the same time
> +	 * (thanks to the await start), our signaler may still be indefinitely
> +	 * delayed by waiting on a semaphore from a remote engine. If our
> +	 * signaler depends on a sempahore, so indirectly do we, and we do not

s/sempahore/semaphore
-Mika

> +	 * want to start our payload until our signaler also starts theirs.
> +	 * So we wait.
> +	 */
> +	if (intel_engine_has_semaphores(to->engine) && from->sched.semaphores) {
> +		err = __emit_semaphore_wait(to, from, from->fence.seqno - 1);
> +		if (err < 0)
> +			return err;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* Couple the dependency tree for PI on this exposed to->fence */
>  	if (to->engine->schedule) {
>  		err = i915_sched_node_add_dependency(&to->sched, &from->sched);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx