From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/24] drm/i915/selftests: Wait for the kernel context switch
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:09:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zhd27npz.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200228082330.2411941-18-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> As we require a context switch to ensure that the current context is
> switched out and saved to memory, perform an explicit switch to the
> kernel context and wait for it.
The patch subject is not incorrect. Just feels that the kernel
context is a patsy in here.
So I would s/kernel// on subject but keep in commit msg
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> index d7f98aada626..95da6b880e3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> @@ -4015,6 +4015,31 @@ static int emit_semaphore_signal(struct intel_context *ce, void *slot)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int context_sync(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> + struct i915_request *rq;
> + struct dma_fence *fence;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + rq = intel_engine_create_kernel_request(ce->engine);
> + if (IS_ERR(rq))
> + return PTR_ERR(rq);
> +
> + fence = i915_active_fence_get(&ce->timeline->last_request);
> + if (fence) {
> + i915_request_await_dma_fence(rq, fence);
> + dma_fence_put(fence);
> + }
> +
> + rq = i915_request_get(rq);
> + i915_request_add(rq);
> + if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 2) < 0)
> + err = -ETIME;
> + i915_request_put(rq);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int live_lrc_layout(void *arg)
> {
> struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> @@ -4638,16 +4663,10 @@ static int __lrc_timestamp(const struct lrc_timestamp *arg, bool preempt)
> wmb();
> }
>
> - if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 2) < 0) {
> - err = -ETIME;
> - goto err;
> - }
> -
> - /* and wait for switch to kernel */
> - if (igt_flush_test(arg->engine->i915)) {
> - err = -EIO;
> + /* and wait for switch to kernel (to save our context to memory) */
> + err = context_sync(arg->ce[0]);
> + if (err)
> goto err;
> - }
>
> rmb();
For me the context_sync could be context_flush and it would
allow the rmb() to be snuck inside.
But I seem to gravitate towards lower resolution and
apparently you prefer to be more fine grained and
explicit on callsites so,
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
>
> --
> 2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-28 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-28 8:23 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/24] drm/i915/gt: Check engine-is-awake on reset later Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/24] drm/i915: Skip barriers inside waits Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/24] drm/i915/perf: Mark up the racy use of perf->exclusive_stream Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/24] drm/i915/perf: Manually acquire engine-wakeref around use of kernel_context Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/24] drm/i915/perf: Reintroduce wait on OA configuration completion Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/24] drm/i915: Wrap i915_active in a simple kreffed struct Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/24] drm/i915: Extend i915_request_await_active to use all timelines Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/24] drm/i915/perf: Schedule oa_config after modifying the contexts Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/24] drm/i915/gem: Consolidate ctx->engines[] release Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/24] drm/i915/gt: Prevent allocation on a banned context Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/24] drm/i915/gem: Check that the context wasn't closed during setup Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/24] drm/i915/selftests: Disable heartbeat around manual pulse tests Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/24] drm/i915/gt: Reset queue_priority_hint after wedging Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/24] drm/i915/gt: Pull marking vm as closed underneath the vm->mutex Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/24] drm/i915: Protect i915_request_await_start from early waits Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/24] drm/i915/selftests: Verify LRC isolation Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/24] drm/i915/selftests: Check recovery from corrupted LRC Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/24] drm/i915/selftests: Wait for the kernel context switch Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 15:09 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2020-02-28 15:14 ` Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/24] drm/i915/selftests: Be a little more lenient for reset workers Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 15:38 ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/24] drm/i915/selftests: Add request throughput measurement to perf Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/24] drm/i915/gt: Declare when we enabled timeslicing Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/24] drm/i915/gt: Yield the timeslice if caught waiting on a user semaphore Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/24] drm/i915/execlists: Check the sentinel is alone in the ELSP Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/24] drm/i915/execlists: Reduce preempt-to-busy roundtrip delay Chris Wilson
2020-02-28 8:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/24] drm/i915/gt: Check engine-is-awake on reset later Patchwork
2020-02-28 8:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zhd27npz.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox