public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: airlied@linux.ie, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Christoph Jaeger <christophjaeger@linux.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: drop __FUNCTION__ as argument to DRM_DEBUG_KMS
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:49:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zjkafvih.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395998364-10560-2-git-send-email-christophjaeger@linux.com>

On Fri, 28 Mar 2014, Christoph Jaeger <christophjaeger@linux.com> wrote:
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS includes printing the function name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Jaeger <christophjaeger@linux.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>


> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c
> index 954acb2..ce5242f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c
> @@ -233,9 +233,8 @@ static enum drm_mode_status ns2501_mode_valid(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>  					      struct drm_display_mode *mode)
>  {
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS
> -	    ("%s: is mode valid (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d)\n",
> -	     __FUNCTION__, mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay,
> -	     mode->vtotal);
> +	    ("is mode valid (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d)\n",
> +	     mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay, mode->vtotal);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Currently, these are all the modes I have data from.
> @@ -261,9 +260,8 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>  	struct ns2501_priv *ns = (struct ns2501_priv *)(dvo->dev_priv);
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS
> -	    ("%s: set mode (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d).\n",
> -	     __FUNCTION__, mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay,
> -	     mode->vtotal);
> +	    ("set mode (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d).\n",
> +	     mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay, mode->vtotal);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Where do I find the native resolution for which scaling is not required???
> @@ -277,8 +275,7 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>  		if (mode->hdisplay == 800 && mode->vdisplay == 600) {
>  			/* mode 277 */
>  			ns->reg_8_shadow &= ~NS2501_8_BPAS;
> -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: switching to 800x600\n",
> -				      __FUNCTION__);
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("switching to 800x600\n");
>  
>  			/*
>  			 * No, I do not know where this data comes from.
> @@ -341,8 +338,7 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>  
>  		} else if (mode->hdisplay == 640 && mode->vdisplay == 480) {
>  			/* mode 274 */
> -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: switching to 640x480\n",
> -				      __FUNCTION__);
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("switching to 640x480\n");
>  			/*
>  			 * No, I do not know where this data comes from.
>  			 * It is just what the video bios left in the DVO, so
> @@ -406,8 +402,7 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo,
>  
>  		} else if (mode->hdisplay == 1024 && mode->vdisplay == 768) {
>  			/* mode 280 */
> -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: switching to 1024x768\n",
> -				      __FUNCTION__);
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("switching to 1024x768\n");
>  			/*
>  			 * This might or might not work, actually. I'm silently
>  			 * assuming here that the native panel resolution is
> @@ -458,8 +453,7 @@ static void ns2501_dpms(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo, bool enable)
>  	struct ns2501_priv *ns = (struct ns2501_priv *)(dvo->dev_priv);
>  	unsigned char ch;
>  
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: Trying set the dpms of the DVO to %i\n",
> -		      __FUNCTION__, enable);
> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Trying set the dpms of the DVO to %i\n", enable);
>  
>  	ch = ns->reg_8_shadow;
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.5.3
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-28 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-27 23:20 [PATCH] drm/i915: use __func__ instead of __FUNCTION__ Christoph Jaeger
2014-03-28  6:47 ` Jani Nikula
2014-03-28  9:19   ` Christoph Jaeger
2014-03-28  9:19     ` [PATCH] drm/i915: drop __FUNCTION__ as argument to DRM_DEBUG_KMS Christoph Jaeger
2014-03-28 10:49       ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2014-03-28 17:35         ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zjkafvih.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=christophjaeger@linux.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox