From: "Tang, CQ" <cq.tang@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make the GEM reclaim workqueue high priority
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 16:19:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c41461201764a0d8a05caba47d1589a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201013103256.31446-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Chris,
I tested this patch. It is still not enough, I keep catch running out of lmem. Every worker invocation takes larger and larger freeing object count.
Here is my debugging code:
+static int obj_count = 0;
+
......
+ if (llist_add(&obj->freed, &i915->mm.free_list)) {
+ bool b;
+ b = queue_work(i915->wq, &i915->mm.free_work);
+ pr_err("queue_work: %d, %d; %d\n", atomic_read(&i915->mm.free_count), obj_count, b);
+ obj_count = 1;
+ } else {
+ obj_count++;
+ }
And here is the output:
[ 821.213680] queue_work: 108068, 105764; 1
[ 823.309468] queue_work: 148843, 147948; 1
[ 826.453132] queue_work: 220000, 218123; 1
[ 831.522506] queue_work: 334812, 333773; 1
[ 840.040571] queue_work: 539650, 538922; 1
[ 860.337644] queue_work: 960811, 1017158; 1
The second number, 'obj_count', is the objects taken by last worker invocation to free.
--CQ
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 3:33 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>; Tang, CQ <cq.tang@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Make the GEM reclaim workqueue high priority
>
> Since removing dev->struct_mutex usage, we only use i915->wq for batch
> freeing of GEM objects and ppGTT, it is essential for memory reclaim. If we
> let the workqueue dawdle, we trap excess amounts of memory, so give it a
> priority boost. Although since we no longer depend on a singular mutex, we
> could run unbounded, but first lets try to keep some constraint upon the
> worker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 16 +++-------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c index 8bb7e2dcfaaa..8c9198f0d2ad
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -219,20 +219,10 @@ intel_teardown_mchbar(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv) static int i915_workqueues_init(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv) {
> /*
> - * The i915 workqueue is primarily used for batched retirement of
> - * requests (and thus managing bo) once the task has been
> completed
> - * by the GPU. i915_retire_requests() is called directly when we
> - * need high-priority retirement, such as waiting for an explicit
> - * bo.
> - *
> - * It is also used for periodic low-priority events, such as
> - * idle-timers and recording error state.
> - *
> - * All tasks on the workqueue are expected to acquire the dev mutex
> - * so there is no point in running more than one instance of the
> - * workqueue at any time. Use an ordered one.
> + * The i915 workqueue is primarily used for batched freeing of
> + * GEM objects and ppGTT, and is essential for memory reclaim.
> */
> - dev_priv->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("i915", 0);
> + dev_priv->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("i915", WQ_HIGHPRI);
> if (dev_priv->wq == NULL)
> goto out_err;
>
> --
> 2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-13 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-13 10:32 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Make the GEM reclaim workqueue high priority Chris Wilson
2020-10-13 12:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-10-13 16:19 ` Tang, CQ [this message]
2020-10-13 16:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2020-10-13 16:40 ` Tang, CQ
2020-10-13 23:29 ` Tang, CQ
2020-10-15 15:06 ` Chris Wilson
2020-10-15 20:09 ` Tang, CQ
2020-10-15 20:32 ` Chris Wilson
2020-10-15 22:25 ` Tang, CQ
2020-10-14 3:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c41461201764a0d8a05caba47d1589a@intel.com \
--to=cq.tang@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox