Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Teres Alexis, Alan Previn" <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
To: "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/6] drm/i915/pxp: Make gt and pxp init/fini aware of PXP-owning-GT
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:22:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c51abaf741f2761270159c1bc7fb97324fd802e.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8fa83788f7df781d534b6710c429999491d6772.camel@intel.com>

typo correction...

On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 12:13 -0800, Alan Previn Teres Alexis wrote:
> After a more comprehensive offline discussion with Daniele and Rodrigo, design direction was made to go with Option2
> where we elevate pxp to a global subsystem and within it it establish a pointer to the correct gt for pxp-controls. This
> also reflects the current HW architectures where the PXP feature (when viewed as a service for contexts and buffers) is
> global to all subsystems including any workload on any tile, despite its single control-knobs being only in the media
> tile (because PXP controls needs to be global to the GPU to avoid any races).
> 
> This would mean we move 'struct intel_pxp' to be under i915 so that all subsystems that need to call into PXP would now
> pass in i915 as its parameter. PXP internally would have a pointer to the correct GT (media-tile for MTL and gt0 for
typo: "pass in i915->pxp as its parameter"
> prior).
> 
> It would also mean that certain code will still look a little kludgy or needs attention:
>  - power-related operations like init/fini and suspend/resume would now need to called either before or after all-gt
> equivalents to ensure proper flow.
>  - KCR IRQ will although being a gt level IRQ will now require passing i915 into the pxp subsystem.
> 
> *NOTE: above list, even if i missed any, would still be nowhere near the amount of other external facing interfaces that
> would be called by global subsystems that would now look clean with i915->pxp as its param.
> 
> ...alan


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-23 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-17  0:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/6] drm/i915/pxp: Prepare intel_pxp entry points for MTL Alan Previn
2022-11-17  0:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/6] drm/i915/pxp: Make gt and pxp init/fini aware of PXP-owning-GT Alan Previn
2022-11-17 16:02   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-11-17 22:34     ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2022-11-21 11:39       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-11-21 12:12         ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-21 17:02           ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2022-11-21 14:06         ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2022-11-21 17:51           ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2022-11-22 17:57             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-11-22 18:50               ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2022-11-22 20:11                 ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2022-11-23 23:22                   ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn [this message]
2022-11-22 21:12                 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-11-21 17:06         ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2022-11-17  0:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/6] drm/i915/pxp: Make intel_pxp_is_enabled implicitly sort PXP-owning-GT Alan Previn
2022-11-17 16:04   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-11-17 23:04     ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2022-11-22 11:17       ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-22 20:11         ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2022-11-17  0:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 3/6] drm/i915/pxp: Make intel_pxp_is_active " Alan Previn
2022-11-17 16:05   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-11-17  0:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 4/6] drm/i915/pxp: Make PXP tee component bind/unbind aware of PXP-owning-GT Alan Previn
2022-11-17 16:07   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-11-17  0:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/i915/pxp: Make intel_pxp_start implicitly sort PXP-owning-GT Alan Previn
2022-11-17  0:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/i915/pxp: Make intel_pxp_key_check " Alan Previn
2022-11-17  0:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/pxp: Prepare intel_pxp entry points for MTL (rev4) Patchwork
2022-11-17  1:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-11-17 12:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8c51abaf741f2761270159c1bc7fb97324fd802e.camel@intel.com \
    --to=alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox