Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/gem: Migrate to system at dma-buf map time

["Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>]

On 6/25/21 7:38 PM, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2021 12:18 PM
>> To: Ruhl, Michael J <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>; intel-
>> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Auld, Matthew <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/gem: Migrate to system at dma-buf map
>> time
>>
>> Hi, Michael,
>>
>> thanks for looking at this.
>>
>> On 6/25/21 6:02 PM, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: dri-devel <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
>>>> Thomas Hellström
>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 2:31 PM
>>>> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>; Auld,
>> Matthew
>>>> <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/gem: Migrate to system at dma-buf map
>> time
>>>> Until we support p2p dma or as a complement to that, migrate data
>>>> to system memory at dma-buf map time if possible.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>>>> index 616c3a2f1baf..a52f885bc09a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>>>> @@ -25,7 +25,14 @@ static struct sg_table
>> *i915_gem_map_dma_buf(struct
>>>> dma_buf_attachment *attachme
>>>> 	struct scatterlist *src, *dst;
>>>> 	int ret, i;
>>>>
>>>> -	ret = i915_gem_object_pin_pages_unlocked(obj);
>>>> +	ret = i915_gem_object_lock_interruptible(obj, NULL);
>>> Hmm, I believe in most cases that the caller should be holding the
>>> lock (object dma-resv) on this object already.
>> Yes, I agree, In particular for other instances of our own driver,  at
>> least since the dma_resv introduction.
>>
>> But I also think that's a pre-existing bug, since
>> i915_gem_object_pin_pages_unlocked() will also take the lock.
> Ouch yes.  Missed that.
>
>> I Think we need to initially make the exporter dynamic-capable to
>> resolve this, and drop the locking here completely, as dma-buf docs says
>> that we're then guaranteed to get called with the object lock held.
>>
>> I figure if we make the exporter dynamic, we need to migrate already at
>> dma_buf_pin time so we don't pin the object in the wrong location.
> The exporter as dynamic  (ops->pin is available) is optional, but importer
> dynamic (ops->move_notify) is required.
>
> With that in mind, it would seem that there are three possible combinations
> for the migrate to be attempted:
>
> 1) in the ops->pin function (export_dynamic != import_dynamic, during attach)
> 2) in the ops->pin function (export_dynamic and !CONFIG_DMABUF_MOVE_NOTIFY) during mapping
> 3) and possibly in ops->map_dma_buf (exort_dynamic iand CONFIG_DMABUF_MOVE_NOTIFY)
>
> Since one possibility has to be in the mapping function, it seems that if we
> can figure out the locking, that the migrate should probably be available here.
>
> Mike

So perhaps just to initially fix the bug, we could just implement NOP 
pin() and unpin() callbacks and drop the locking in map_attach() and 
replace it with an assert_object_held();

/Thomas


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx