From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Device id consolidation
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:23:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e754a47-bc86-3a5b-e21c-9cf1da9c2b0b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190326074057.27833-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
On 26/03/2019 07:40, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> Series removes device id checks from i915_drv.h macros and consolidates them to
> i915_pciids.h as the main "database", while making intel_device_info.c reference
> the former, expanding the existing concept of a platform mask by a few low bits
> reserved for sub-platform mask.
>
> This has a two-fold positive effect of firstly consolidating the list of device
> ids to one location, and secondly removing the if-ladders from every
> IS_<platfrom>_<subplatform> call site.
>
> Maintenance burden is not completely removed but should be improved. One case in
> point is that I have found some disagreements between device id listed in
> i915_pciids.h and i915_drv.h.
>
> At the same time platform mask code is generalized to an array of u32 to
> accomodate the addition of EHL and avoid spilling into u64 which would cause a
> small code size increase. Downside is that any platforms on the u32 boundary,
> like currently ICL and EHL, lose the benefit of optimizing the "IS_ICELAKE ||
> IS_ELKHARTLAKE" checks into a single conditional, although at the moment there
> aren't any such call-sites.
>
> Before vs after for the whole series:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 1891093 43903 7424 1942420 1da394 i915.ko.0
> 1890434 43903 7424 1941761 1da101 i915.ko.1
>
> add/remove: 12/3 grow/shrink: 92/121 up/down: 1974/-1769 (205)
> ...
> Total: Before=1286293, After=1286498, chg +0.02%
After patch 4 v8:
text data bss dec hex filename
1904423 43891 7424 1955738 1dd79a i915.ko.0
1903354 43891 7424 1954669 1dd36d i915.ko.1
add/remove: 8/3 grow/shrink: 94/124 up/down: 1623/-1889 (-266)
...
Total: Before=1293823, After=1293557, chg -0.02%
Regards,
Tvrtko
> Tvrtko Ursulin (4):
> drm/i915: Split Pineview device info into desktop and mobile
> drm/i915: Remove redundant device id from IS_IRONLAKE_M macro
> drm/i915: Split some PCI ids into separate groups
> drm/i915: Introduce concept of a sub-platform
>
> arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 8 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 133 +++++++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 14 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 27 +++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 +-
> include/drm/i915_pciids.h | 179 ++++++++++++++++-------
> 9 files changed, 414 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-28 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-26 7:40 [PATCH 0/4] Device id consolidation Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 7:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Split Pineview device info into desktop and mobile Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 7:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Remove redundant device id from IS_IRONLAKE_M macro Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 7:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Split some PCI ids into separate groups Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 7:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Introduce concept of a sub-platform Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 8:39 ` Jani Nikula
2019-03-26 9:34 ` Jani Nikula
2019-03-26 9:53 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-27 11:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-27 11:41 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-27 12:03 ` Jani Nikula
2019-03-27 14:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-27 15:06 ` Jani Nikula
2019-03-27 11:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-27 14:23 ` [PATCH v8 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-29 9:54 ` Jani Nikula
2019-03-29 12:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-29 13:10 ` Jani Nikula
2019-03-26 15:59 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Device id consolidation Patchwork
2019-03-26 16:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-03-26 16:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-03-26 23:06 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-03-27 17:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Device id consolidation (rev2) Patchwork
2019-03-27 17:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-03-27 18:38 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-04-01 16:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-28 9:23 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2019-03-28 9:39 ` [PATCH 0/4] Device id consolidation Chris Wilson
2019-03-29 9:17 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-28 12:43 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for Device id consolidation (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e754a47-bc86-3a5b-e21c-9cf1da9c2b0b@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox