From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/ttm: switch over to ttm_buddy_man
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 11:53:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e8a5115-730e-c892-a241-c69a5662b2c7@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210608084428.142676-6-matthew.auld@intel.com>
On 6/8/21 10:44 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
> Move back to the buddy allocator for managing device local memory, and
> restore the lost mock selftests. Keep around the range manager related
> bits, since we likely need this for managing stolen at some point. For
> stolen we also don't need to reserve anything so no need to support a
> generic reserve interface.
>
> v2(Thomas):
> - bo->page_alignment is in page units, not bytes
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 26 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c | 55 +-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.h | 17 --
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c | 100 +++--------
> .../drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c | 170 ++++++++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_region.c | 15 +-
> 6 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 215 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> index c612275c36c9..5bf1d1945dd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> @@ -181,11 +181,7 @@ static bool i915_ttm_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = i915_ttm_to_gem(bo);
>
> /* Will do for now. Our pinned objects are still on TTM's LRU lists */
> - if (!i915_gem_object_evictable(obj))
> - return false;
> -
> - /* This isn't valid with a buddy allocator */
> - return ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(bo, place);
> + return i915_gem_object_evictable(obj);
> }
>
> static void i915_ttm_evict_flags(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> @@ -328,11 +324,15 @@ i915_ttm_resource_get_st(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = i915_gem_to_ttm(obj);
> struct ttm_resource_manager *man =
> ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, res->mem_type);
> + struct intel_memory_region *mr = obj->mm.region;
>
> if (man->use_tt)
> return i915_ttm_tt_get_st(bo->ttm);
>
> - return intel_region_ttm_node_to_st(obj->mm.region, res->mm_node);
> + if (mr->is_range_manager)
Did you look at moving this test into intel_region_ttm_node_to_st())
> + return intel_region_ttm_node_to_st(mr, res);
> + else
> + return i915_sg_from_buddy_resource(res, mr->region.start);
> }
Thanks,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-08 8:44 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/6] Add back the buddy allocator Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/ttm: add ttm_buddy_man Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915/ttm: add i915_sg_from_buddy_resource Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/ttm: Calculate the object placement at get_pages time Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/ttm: pass along the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 9:48 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/ttm: switch over to ttm_buddy_man Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 9:53 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2021-06-08 10:08 ` Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 10:14 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 8:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915/ttm: restore min_page_size behaviour Matthew Auld
2021-06-08 9:49 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-08 9:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Add back the buddy allocator (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e8a5115-730e-c892-a241-c69a5662b2c7@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox