From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Nuke live_forcewake_domains selftest
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:08:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9012f715a09ce730a81295f44e3ef7c45a7fe0a6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323101609.8391-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 23 Mar 2026, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> The live_forcewake_domains selftest doesn't really test anything
> particularly sensible. It only runs on platforms that have RMbus
> unclaimer error detection, but that only catches display registers
> which the test doesn't even access.
>
> I suppose if we really wanted to we might try to make the test
> exercise the GT FIFO instead by writing GT registers as fast
> as possible, and then checking GTFIFODBG to see if the FIFO has
> overflowed. But dunno if there's much point in that. I think a
> GT FIFO overflow might even be fatal to the machine.
>
> So in its current for the test doesn't really make sense,
*form
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> and it's in the way of moving all the RMbus noclaim stuff
> to the display driver side. So let's just get rid of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c | 62 -------------------
> 1 file changed, 62 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c
> index 507bf42a1aaf..514d2200751b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -272,67 +272,6 @@ static int live_forcewake_ops(void *arg)
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int live_forcewake_domains(void *arg)
> -{
> -#define FW_RANGE 0x40000
> - struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> - struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
> - struct intel_display *display = i915->display;
> - unsigned long *valid;
> - u32 offset;
> - int err;
> -
> - if (!HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED(display) &&
> - !IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915) &&
> - !IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
> - return 0;
> -
> - /*
> - * This test may lockup the machine or cause GPU hangs afterwards.
> - */
> - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST_BROKEN))
> - return 0;
> -
> - valid = bitmap_zalloc(FW_RANGE, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!valid)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - intel_uncore_forcewake_get(uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> -
> - check_for_unclaimed_mmio(uncore);
> - for (offset = 0; offset < FW_RANGE; offset += 4) {
> - i915_reg_t reg = { offset };
> -
> - intel_uncore_posting_read_fw(uncore, reg);
> - if (!check_for_unclaimed_mmio(uncore))
> - set_bit(offset, valid);
> - }
> -
> - intel_uncore_forcewake_put(uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> -
> - err = 0;
> - for_each_set_bit(offset, valid, FW_RANGE) {
> - i915_reg_t reg = { offset };
> -
> - iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> - intel_uncore_forcewake_reset(uncore);
> - iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> -
> - check_for_unclaimed_mmio(uncore);
> -
> - intel_uncore_posting_read_fw(uncore, reg);
> - if (check_for_unclaimed_mmio(uncore)) {
> - pr_err("Unclaimed mmio read to register 0x%04x\n",
> - offset);
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - bitmap_free(valid);
> - return err;
> -}
> -
> static int live_fw_table(void *arg)
> {
> struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
> @@ -348,7 +287,6 @@ int intel_uncore_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
> SUBTEST(live_fw_table),
> SUBTEST(live_forcewake_ops),
> - SUBTEST(live_forcewake_domains),
> };
>
> return intel_gt_live_subtests(tests, to_gt(i915));
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-23 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 10:16 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/uncode: Decouple GT FIFO checks from unclaimed reg checks Ville Syrjala
2026-03-23 10:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Nuke live_forcewake_domains selftest Ville Syrjala
2026-03-23 12:08 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-03-23 10:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/uncore: Do GT FIFO checks in early sanitize and forcewake get Ville Syrjala
2026-03-25 15:54 ` Jani Nikula
2026-03-23 13:05 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/uncode: Decouple GT FIFO checks from unclaimed reg checks Patchwork
2026-03-23 17:49 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9012f715a09ce730a81295f44e3ef7c45a7fe0a6@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox