Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "Manna, Animesh" <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Murthy, Arun R" <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>,
	"Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/i915/alpm: Add debugfs for LOBF
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 09:37:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <91745df15f5a04c52fce2686072feaad839056f9.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH7PR11MB59813E1EC23A0C1487B7C47CF91F2@PH7PR11MB5981.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 08:30 +0000, Manna, Animesh wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hogander, Jouni <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, May 3, 2024 1:02 PM
> > To: Manna, Animesh <animesh.manna@intel.com>; intel-
> > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Murthy, Arun R
> > <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>; Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/i915/alpm: Add debugfs for LOBF
> > 
> > On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 00:08 +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
> > > For validation purpose add debugfs for LOBF.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c     | 48
> > > +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h     |  2 +
> > >  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c  |  2 +
> > >  3 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> > > index b08799586b58..2d3027c2fb0a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> > > @@ -343,3 +343,51 @@ void intel_alpm_configure(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp,
> > >  {
> > >         lnl_alpm_configure(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> > >  }
> > > +
> > > +static int i915_edp_lobf_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void
> > > *data)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct intel_connector *connector = m->private;
> > > +       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector-
> > > > base.dev);
> > > +       struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > > +       struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> > > +       enum transcoder cpu_transcoder;
> > > +       bool lobf_enabled;
> > > +       int ret;
> > > +
> > > +       ret = drm_modeset_lock_single_interruptible(&dev_priv-
> > > > drm.mode_config.connection_mutex);
> > > +       if (ret)
> > > +               return ret;
> > > +
> > > +       crtc = connector->base.state->crtc;
> > > +       if (connector->base.status != connector_status_connected
> > > ||
> > > !crtc) {
> > > +               ret = -ENODEV;
> > > +               goto out;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state);
> > > +       seq_printf(m, "LOBF Criteria met: %s\n",
> > > str_yes_no(crtc_state->has_lobf));
> > 
> > I'm still not convinced on this. has_lobf ~= ALPM_CTL_LOBF_ENABLE
> > in
> > ALPM_CTL. To my opinion it is enough to dump seq_printf(m, "LOBF
> > status: %s\n", str_enabled_disabled(lobf_enabled)) below. Maybe
> > AUX_WAKE and AUX_LESS_WAKE could be dumped instead?
> 
> Can add aux-wake or aux-less info as well.
> But as LOBF feature is dependent on adaptive sync fixed refresh rate
> mode (which can be dynamic as per user input) and ALPM. I want to
> expose both the conditions are satisfying or not along with status.

If all those conditions are satisfied (i.e. has_lobf is true) then 
ALPM_CTL & ALPM_CTL_LOBF_ENABLE is true? So I'm wondering what is the
benefit from dumping has_lobf?

BR,

Jouni Högander

> 
> Regards,
> Animesh
>  
> > 
> > BR,
> > 
> > Jouni Högander
> > 
> > > +
> > > +       cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> > > +       lobf_enabled = intel_de_read(dev_priv,
> > > ALPM_CTL(cpu_transcoder)) & ALPM_CTL_LOBF_ENABLE;
> > > +       seq_printf(m, "LOBF status: %s\n",
> > > str_enabled_disabled(lobf_enabled));
> > > +
> > > +out:
> > > +       drm_modeset_unlock(&dev_priv-
> > > > drm.mode_config.connection_mutex);
> > > +
> > > +       return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(i915_edp_lobf_info);
> > > +
> > > +void intel_alpm_lobf_debugfs_add(struct intel_connector
> > > *connector)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(connector-
> > > >base.dev);
> > > +       struct dentry *root = connector->base.debugfs_entry;
> > > +
> > > +       if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 20 ||
> > > +           connector->base.connector_type !=
> > DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
> > > +               return;
> > > +
> > > +       debugfs_create_file("i915_edp_lobf_info", 0444, root,
> > > +                           connector, &i915_edp_lobf_info_fops);
> > > +}
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> > > index a9ca190da3e4..01fd08eb96f5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.h
> > > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > >  struct intel_dp;
> > >  struct intel_crtc_state;
> > >  struct drm_connector_state;
> > > +struct intel_connector;
> > > 
> > >  bool intel_alpm_get_aux_less_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> > >  bool intel_alpm_compute_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > @@ -20,4 +21,5 @@ void intel_alpm_compute_lobf_config(struct
> > > intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp,
> > >                                     struct drm_connector_state
> > > *conn_state);
> > >  void intel_alpm_configure(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > >                           const struct intel_crtc_state
> > > *crtc_state);
> > > +void intel_alpm_lobf_debugfs_add(struct intel_connector
> > > *connector);
> > >  #endif
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> > > index 35f9f86ef70f..86d9900c40af 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> > > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> > >  #include "i915_debugfs.h"
> > >  #include "i915_irq.h"
> > >  #include "i915_reg.h"
> > > +#include "intel_alpm.h"
> > >  #include "intel_crtc.h"
> > >  #include "intel_de.h"
> > >  #include "intel_crtc_state_dump.h"
> > > @@ -1515,6 +1516,7 @@ void intel_connector_debugfs_add(struct
> > > intel_connector *connector)
> > >         intel_drrs_connector_debugfs_add(connector);
> > >         intel_pps_connector_debugfs_add(connector);
> > >         intel_psr_connector_debugfs_add(connector);
> > > +       intel_alpm_lobf_debugfs_add(connector);
> > > 
> > >         if (connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort ||
> > >             connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_HDMIA ||
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-03  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-24 18:38 [PATCH v3 0/6] Link off between frames for edp Animesh Manna
2024-04-24 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/i915/alpm: Move alpm parameters from intel_psr Animesh Manna
2024-04-24 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] drm/i915/alpm: Move alpm related code to a new file Animesh Manna
2024-04-26  7:55   ` kernel test robot
2024-04-24 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/display: Add missing aux less alpm wake related bits Animesh Manna
2024-04-24 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] drm/i915/alpm: Add compute config for lobf Animesh Manna
2024-04-26 17:42   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-03  7:19   ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-05-03  8:42     ` Manna, Animesh
2024-05-03  9:40       ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-04-24 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] drm/i915/alpm: Enable lobf from source in ALPM_CTL Animesh Manna
2024-05-03  7:48   ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-05-03  8:19     ` Manna, Animesh
2024-05-03  9:33       ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-04-24 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/i915/alpm: Add debugfs for LOBF Animesh Manna
2024-05-03  7:31   ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-05-03  8:30     ` Manna, Animesh
2024-05-03  9:37       ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2024-04-24 19:24 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Link off between frames for edp (rev3) Patchwork
2024-04-24 19:24 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-04-24 19:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-04-25 13:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-05-03  9:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Link off between frames for edp Hogander, Jouni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=91745df15f5a04c52fce2686072feaad839056f9.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox