From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [CI 10/10] drm/xe/rps: build RPS as part of xe
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 11:16:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93df0bb727fce14aa9a542dbd2c0826a0fa0a16f.1763370931.git.jani.nikula@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1763370930.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reduce the conditional compilation in i915 by building
intel_display_rps.c as part of the xe module. This doesn't actually
enable RPS on xe, because there's no parent interface implementation on
xe side, but it's a step in the right direction.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
.../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h | 21 -------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h
index 183d154f2c7c..96b1fd00ead4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_rps.h
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ struct drm_crtc;
struct intel_atomic_state;
struct intel_display;
-#ifdef I915
void intel_display_rps_boost_after_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
struct dma_fence *fence);
void intel_display_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_display *display,
@@ -22,25 +21,5 @@ void intel_display_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_display *display,
void ilk_display_rps_enable(struct intel_display *display);
void ilk_display_rps_disable(struct intel_display *display);
void ilk_display_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_display *display);
-#else
-static inline void intel_display_rps_boost_after_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
- struct dma_fence *fence)
-{
-}
-static inline void intel_display_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_display *display,
- struct intel_atomic_state *state,
- bool interactive)
-{
-}
-static inline void ilk_display_rps_enable(struct intel_display *display)
-{
-}
-static inline void ilk_display_rps_disable(struct intel_display *display)
-{
-}
-static inline void ilk_display_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_display *display)
-{
-}
-#endif
#endif /* __INTEL_DISPLAY_RPS_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
index c2d2303a8198..1a3aa041820d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
@@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ xe-$(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY) += \
i915-display/intel_display_power_map.o \
i915-display/intel_display_power_well.o \
i915-display/intel_display_rpm.o \
+ i915-display/intel_display_rps.o \
i915-display/intel_display_trace.o \
i915-display/intel_display_utils.o \
i915-display/intel_display_wa.o \
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 9:16 [CI 00/10] drm/i915: call irq and rps through the parent interface Jani Nikula
2025-11-17 9:16 ` [CI 01/10] drm/{i915, xe}/display: duplicate gen2 irq/error init/reset in display irq Jani Nikula
2025-11-17 9:16 ` [CI 02/10] drm/i915/display: convert the display irq interfaces to struct intel_display Jani Nikula
2025-11-17 9:16 ` [CI 03/10] drm/{i915,xe}/display: move irq calls to parent interface Jani Nikula
2025-11-17 9:16 ` [CI 04/10] drm/i915: add .vgpu_active " Jani Nikula
2025-11-17 9:16 ` [CI 05/10] drm/i915: add .has_fenced_regions " Jani Nikula
2025-11-17 9:16 ` [CI 06/10] drm/i915/rps: store struct dma_fence in struct wait_rps_boost Jani Nikula
2025-11-17 9:16 ` [CI 07/10] drm/i915/rps: call RPS functions via the parent interface Jani Nikula
2025-11-17 9:16 ` [CI 08/10] drm/i915/rps: postpone i915 fence check to boost Jani Nikula
2025-11-17 9:16 ` [CI 09/10] drm/i915: add .fence_priority_display to parent interface Jani Nikula
2025-11-17 9:16 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-11-17 10:40 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: call irq and rps through the parent interface (rev5) Patchwork
2025-11-17 17:05 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: call irq and rps through the parent interface (rev6) Patchwork
2025-11-17 17:23 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-18 11:10 ` Ravali, JupallyX
2025-11-18 10:56 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-11-18 13:53 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93df0bb727fce14aa9a542dbd2c0826a0fa0a16f.1763370931.git.jani.nikula@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox