public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/46] drm/i915: Replace global_seqno with a hangcheck heartbeat seqno
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:56:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <959d5585-28a4-533e-5077-e631ef295a81@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <154988905561.15715.4216984715831782716@skylake-alporthouse-com>


On 11/02/2019 12:44, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-02-11 12:40:07)
>>
>> On 06/02/2019 13:03, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> To determine whether an engine has 'stuck', we simply check whether or
>>> not is still on the same seqno for several seconds. To keep this simple
>>> mechanism intact over the loss of a global seqno, we can simply add a
>>> new global heartbeat seqno instead. As we cannot know the sequence in
>>> which requests will then be completed, we use a primitive random number
>>> generator instead (with a cycle long enough to not matter over an
>>> interval of a few thousand requests between hangcheck samples).
>>
>> We couldn't keep the global seqno just for hangcheck puposes? I mean as
>> long as it is unique, which would be guaranteed by obtaining an
>> increment on every submission to hw and storing it in atomic_t
>> i915->hangcheck_global_seqno / rq->hangcheck_global_seqno, hangcheck
>> does not care about the order of execution, no?
> 
> s/global_seqno/hangcheck_seqno/ ?

Yes sure, I was just trying to express the idea that a "globally" unique 
number is all that I thought we need. Like:

     rq->hangcheck_seqno = atomic_inc_return(&i915->hangcheck_seqno);

Did I get that right then? That we don't really need the pseudo random 
number solution? We could even avoid calling it a seqno if desired. 
rq->unique, wait.. we possibly had this name for something in the past..

> (a) the goal is to kill off global_seqno entirely so we are all sure
> there is no such seqno or ordering anymore
> (b) this is a temporary patch and we kill off hangcheck_seqno, just as
> soon as I can submit requests without struct_mutex

The heartbeat request solution? Is that better than the hangcheck seqno?

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-11 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-06 13:03 The road to load balancing Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 01/46] drm/i915: Hack and slash, throttle execbuffer hogs Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 02/46] drm/i915: Revoke mmaps and prevent access to fence registers across reset Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 15:56   ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-02-06 16:08     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 16:18       ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-26 19:53   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2019-02-26 20:27     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 03/46] drm/i915: Force the GPU reset upon wedging Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 04/46] drm/i915: Uninterruptibly drain the timelines on unwedging Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 05/46] drm/i915: Wait for old resets before applying debugfs/i915_wedged Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 06/46] drm/i915: Serialise resets with wedging Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 07/46] drm/i915: Don't claim an unstarted request was guilty Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 08/46] drm/i915/execlists: Suppress mere WAIT preemption Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 11:19   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-19 10:22   ` Matthew Auld
2019-02-19 10:34     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 09/46] drm/i915/execlists: Suppress redundant preemption Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 10/46] drm/i915: Make request allocation caches global Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 11:43   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-11 12:40     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 17:02       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-12 11:51         ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 11/46] drm/i915: Keep timeline HWSP allocated until idle across the system Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 12/46] drm/i915/execlists: Refactor out can_merge_rq() Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 13/46] drm/i915: Compute the global scheduler caps Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 12:24   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-11 12:33     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 14/46] drm/i915: Use HW semaphores for inter-engine synchronisation on gen8+ Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 15/46] drm/i915: Prioritise non-busywait semaphore workloads Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 16/46] drm/i915: Show support for accurate sw PMU busyness tracking Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 17/46] drm/i915: Apply rps waitboosting for dma_fence_wait_timeout() Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 18:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 18/46] drm/i915: Replace global_seqno with a hangcheck heartbeat seqno Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 12:40   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-11 12:44     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 16:56       ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2019-02-12 13:36         ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 19/46] drm/i915/pmu: Always sample an active ringbuffer Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 18:18   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-12 13:40     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 20/46] drm/i915: Remove access to global seqno in the HWSP Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 18:22   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 21/46] drm/i915: Remove i915_request.global_seqno Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 18:44   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-12 13:45     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 22/46] drm/i915: Force GPU idle on suspend Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 23/46] drm/i915/selftests: Improve switch-to-kernel-context checking Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 24/46] drm/i915: Do a synchronous switch-to-kernel-context on idling Chris Wilson
2019-02-21 19:48   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-02-21 21:17     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-21 21:31       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-02-21 21:42         ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-21 22:53           ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-02-21 23:25             ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-22  0:29               ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 25/46] drm/i915: Store the BIT(engine->id) as the engine's mask Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 18:51   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-12 13:51     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 26/46] drm/i915: Refactor common code to load initial power context Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 27/46] drm/i915: Reduce presumption of request ordering for barriers Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 28/46] drm/i915: Remove has-kernel-context Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 29/46] drm/i915: Introduce the i915_user_extension_method Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 19:00   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-12 13:56     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 30/46] drm/i915: Track active engines within a context Chris Wilson
2019-02-11 19:11   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-12 13:59     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 31/46] drm/i915: Introduce a context barrier callback Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 32/46] drm/i915: Create/destroy VM (ppGTT) for use with contexts Chris Wilson
2019-02-12 11:18   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-12 14:11     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 33/46] drm/i915: Extend CONTEXT_CREATE to set parameters upon construction Chris Wilson
2019-02-12 13:43   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 34/46] drm/i915: Allow contexts to share a single timeline across all engines Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 35/46] drm/i915: Fix I915_EXEC_RING_MASK Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 36/46] drm/i915: Remove last traces of exec-id (GEM_BUSY) Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 37/46] drm/i915: Re-arrange execbuf so context is known before engine Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 38/46] drm/i915: Allow a context to define its set of engines Chris Wilson
2019-02-25 10:41   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-02-25 10:47     ` Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 39/46] drm/i915: Extend I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_SSEU to support local ctx->engine[] Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 40/46] drm/i915: Pass around the intel_context Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 41/46] drm/i915: Split struct intel_context definition to its own header Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 42/46] drm/i915: Move over to intel_context_lookup() Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 14:27   ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 43/46] drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 44/46] drm/i915: Extend execution fence to support a callback Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 45/46] drm/i915/execlists: Virtual engine bonding Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 46/46] drm/i915: Allow specification of parallel execbuf Chris Wilson
2019-02-06 13:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/46] drm/i915: Hack and slash, throttle execbuffer hogs Patchwork
2019-02-06 14:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-02-06 14:11 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning " Patchwork
2019-02-06 14:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/46] drm/i915: Hack and slash, throttle execbuffer hogs (rev2) Patchwork
2019-02-06 14:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-02-06 14:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-02-06 16:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=959d5585-28a4-533e-5077-e631ef295a81@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox