From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] dma-buf: Warn about dma_fence_chain container rules v2
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 15:42:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97918c8e-6b88-ade5-0dd5-6de01f4f41c3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b384ad5f76da0009dd49965769bcddbc0395111a.camel@linux.intel.com>
Am 09.02.22 um 15:02 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
> On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 11:04 +0100, Christian König wrote:
>> Chaining of dma_fence_chain objects is only allowed through the prev
>> fence and not through the contained fence.
>>
>> Warn about that when we create a dma_fence_chain.
>>
>> v2: fix comment style
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> It looks like this blows up in generic drm code...
>
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22201/shard-skl10/igt@syncobj_timeline@transfer-timeline-point.html
Thanks for the notice. Going to take a look.
I'm wondering why the last CI report I've got didn't showed that.
Christian.
>
> /Thomas
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-09 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-04 10:04 [Intel-gfx] Add warning for nesting dma_fence containers Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] dma-buf: consolidate dma_fence subclass checking Christian König
2022-02-04 10:36 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-04 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] dma-buf: warn about dma_fence_array container rules v2 Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] dma-buf: Warn about dma_fence_chain " Christian König
2022-02-09 14:02 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-09 14:42 ` Christian König [this message]
2022-02-04 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] dma-buf: warn about containers in dma_resv object Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] dma-buf: add dma_fence_chain_contained helper Christian König
2022-02-04 10:38 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-04 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/amdgpu: use dma_fence_chain_contained Christian König
2022-02-04 15:43 ` Alex Deucher
2022-02-04 10:40 ` [Intel-gfx] Add warning for nesting dma_fence containers Thomas Hellström
2022-02-04 13:20 ` Christian König
2022-02-04 13:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/6] dma-buf: consolidate dma_fence subclass checking Patchwork
2022-02-04 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-04 14:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97918c8e-6b88-ade5-0dd5-6de01f4f41c3@gmail.com \
--to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox