From: "Sripada, Radhakrishna" <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
To: "ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalers
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:50:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97d5e8ba1b5b8d03d3a80211ea4638b24c69219b.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190416141404.GH24299@intel.com>
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 17:14 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 03:55:19PM -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> > Fixes the clock-gating issue when pipe scaling is enabled.
> > (Lineage #2006604312)
> >
> > V2: Fix typo in headline(Chris)
> > Handle the non double buffered nature of the register(Ville)
> > V3: Fix checkpatch warning. BAT failure for V2 on gen3 looks
> > unrelated.
> > V4: Split the icl and skl wa's(Ville)
> > V5: Split the checks for icl and skl(Ville)
> > V6: Correct the flipped checks in intel_pre_plane_update(Ville)
> > V7: Use enum for pipe and extend the WA for plane scalers(Ville)
> >
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Cc: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com
> > >
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 42
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 3bd40a4a6739..6f68d039ab47 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ static const struct intel_limit
> > intel_limits_bxt = {
> > .p2 = { .p2_slow = 1, .p2_fast = 20 },
> > };
> >
> > +/* WA Display #0827: Gen9:all */
> > static void
> > skl_wa_827(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int pipe, bool
> > enable)
> > {
> > @@ -489,6 +490,19 @@ skl_wa_827(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > int pipe, bool enable)
> > ~(DUPS1_GATING_DIS | DUPS2_GATING_DIS));
> > }
> >
> > +/* Wa_2006604312:icl */
> > +static void
> > +icl_wa_scalerclkgating(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum
> > pipe pipe,
> > + bool enable)
> > +{
> > + if (enable)
> > + I915_WRITE(CLKGATE_DIS_PSL(pipe),
> > + I915_READ(CLKGATE_DIS_PSL(pipe)) |
> > DPFR_GATING_DIS);
> > + else
> > + I915_WRITE(CLKGATE_DIS_PSL(pipe),
> > + I915_READ(CLKGATE_DIS_PSL(pipe)) &
> > ~DPFR_GATING_DIS);
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool
> > needs_modeset(const struct drm_crtc_state *state)
> > {
> > @@ -5505,6 +5519,18 @@ static bool needs_nv12_wa(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > +static bool needs_scalerclk_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state)
> > +{
> > + /* Wa_2006604312:icl */
> > + if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv) &&
> > + (crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled ||
>
> I don't think we need the pfit check anymore. scaler_users should
> account for that?
I was of the same opinion but sided to err rather than to be sorry. I
can spin out a newer version with the suggested change.
- Radhakrishna(RK) Sripada
>
> > + crtc_state->scaler_state.scaler_users > 0))
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void intel_post_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state
> > *old_crtc_state)
> > {
> > struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(old_crtc_state-
> > >base.crtc);
> > @@ -5538,11 +5564,13 @@ static void intel_post_plane_update(struct
> > intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
> > intel_post_enable_primary(&crtc->base,
> > pipe_config);
> > }
> >
> > - /* Display WA 827 */
> > if (needs_nv12_wa(dev_priv, old_crtc_state) &&
> > - !needs_nv12_wa(dev_priv, pipe_config)) {
> > + !needs_nv12_wa(dev_priv, pipe_config))
> > skl_wa_827(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, false);
> > - }
> > +
> > + if (needs_scalerclk_wa(dev_priv, old_crtc_state) &&
> > + !needs_scalerclk_wa(dev_priv, pipe_config))
> > + icl_wa_scalerclkgating(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, false);
> > }
> >
> > static void intel_pre_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state
> > *old_crtc_state,
> > @@ -5579,9 +5607,13 @@ static void intel_pre_plane_update(struct
> > intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> >
> > /* Display WA 827 */
> > if (!needs_nv12_wa(dev_priv, old_crtc_state) &&
> > - needs_nv12_wa(dev_priv, pipe_config)) {
> > + needs_nv12_wa(dev_priv, pipe_config))
> > skl_wa_827(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, true);
> > - }
> > +
> > + /* Wa_2006604312:icl */
> > + if (!needs_scalerclk_wa(dev_priv, old_crtc_state) &&
> > + needs_scalerclk_wa(dev_priv, pipe_config))
> > + icl_wa_scalerclkgating(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, true);
> >
> > /*
> > * Vblank time updates from the shadow to live plane control
> > register
> > --
> > 2.20.0.rc2.7.g965798d1f299
>
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-16 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-15 22:18 [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalars Radhakrishna Sripada
2019-03-15 22:23 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-18 21:19 ` Sripada, Radhakrishna
2019-03-18 21:22 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-18 22:37 ` Sripada, Radhakrishna
2019-03-15 23:10 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2019-03-16 7:07 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-03-18 13:30 ` [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-03-18 22:32 ` Sripada, Radhakrishna
2019-03-21 1:00 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalers Radhakrishna Sripada
2019-03-21 1:33 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalars (rev2) Patchwork
2019-03-21 2:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-03-21 21:44 ` [PATCH v3] drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalers Radhakrishna Sripada
2019-03-22 13:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-03-25 19:45 ` Sripada, Radhakrishna
2019-03-22 1:10 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalars (rev3) Patchwork
2019-03-22 18:21 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-03-28 17:35 ` [PATCH v4] drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalers Radhakrishna Sripada
2019-03-29 18:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-03-29 23:20 ` Sripada, Radhakrishna
2019-03-28 18:01 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalars (rev4) Patchwork
2019-03-29 4:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-03-30 1:19 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/i915: Rename skl_wa_clkgating to the actual WA Radhakrishna Sripada
2019-03-30 1:19 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/i915: Fix the inconsistent RMW in WA 827 Radhakrishna Sripada
2019-03-30 1:19 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalers Radhakrishna Sripada
2019-04-05 15:07 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-04-05 21:14 ` [PATCH v6] " Radhakrishna Sripada
2019-04-11 21:41 ` Souza, Jose
2019-04-11 23:29 ` Sripada, Radhakrishna
2019-04-12 7:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-04-15 22:55 ` [PATCH v7] " Radhakrishna Sripada
2019-04-16 14:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-04-16 15:50 ` Sripada, Radhakrishna [this message]
2019-04-17 18:59 ` [PATCH v8] " Radhakrishna Sripada
2019-04-23 18:38 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-03-30 2:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalars (rev5) Patchwork
2019-03-30 5:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-04-05 22:51 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalars (rev6) Patchwork
2019-04-06 22:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-04-16 0:13 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalars (rev7) Patchwork
2019-04-16 1:11 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-04-17 19:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalars (rev8) Patchwork
2019-04-18 3:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97d5e8ba1b5b8d03d3a80211ea4638b24c69219b.camel@intel.com \
--to=radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox