From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
<jani.saarinen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/display: Use joined pipes in intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:50:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98619708-7750-4a4c-a1d1-8e67965a6909@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZuH6v1ysrM5zp4rN@intel.com>
On 9/12/2024 1:47 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 06:43:37PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
>> In preparation of ultrajoiner, use number of joined pipes in the
>> intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc helper, instead of joiner flag.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 9 +++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 3 ++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 5 +++--
>> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> index 65044f63d1f5..6c503b5968d2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>> dsc = dsc_max_compressed_bpp && dsc_slice_count;
>> }
>>
>> - if (intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(dev_priv, joiner) && !dsc)
>> + if (intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(dev_priv, num_joined_pipes) && !dsc)
>> return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>>
>> if (mode_rate > max_rate && !dsc)
>> @@ -2520,14 +2520,15 @@ int intel_dp_config_required_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> return intel_dp_link_required(adjusted_mode->crtc_clock, bpp);
>> }
>>
>> -bool intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(struct drm_i915_private *i915, bool use_joiner)
>> +bool intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> + int num_joined_pipes)
>> {
>> /*
>> * Pipe joiner needs compression up to display 12 due to bandwidth
>> * limitation. DG2 onwards pipe joiner can be enabled without
>> * compression.
>> */
>> - return DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 13 && use_joiner;
>> + return DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 13 && (num_joined_pipes == 2);
> Pointless parens.
Noted. Will remove these.
Besides this, I am wondering if I should change the variable
num_joined_pipes to num_pipes or num_pipes_used? So its values 1, 2, 4
make more sense?
Regards,
Ankit
>
>> }
>>
>> static int
>> @@ -2558,7 +2559,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> if (num_joined_pipes == 2)
>> pipe_config->joiner_pipes = GENMASK(crtc->pipe + 1, crtc->pipe);
>>
>> - joiner_needs_dsc = intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(i915, pipe_config->joiner_pipes);
>> + joiner_needs_dsc = intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(i915, num_joined_pipes);
>>
>> dsc_needed = joiner_needs_dsc || intel_dp->force_dsc_en ||
>> !intel_dp_compute_config_limits(intel_dp, pipe_config,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>> index bc9a82d82df2..cc08a309eb78 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>> @@ -123,7 +123,8 @@ int intel_dp_effective_data_rate(int pixel_clock, int bpp_x16,
>> int bw_overhead);
>> int intel_dp_max_link_data_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> int max_dprx_rate, int max_dprx_lanes);
>> -bool intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(struct drm_i915_private *i915, bool use_joiner);
>> +bool intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> + int num_joined_pipes);
>> bool intel_dp_has_joiner(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>> bool intel_dp_needs_vsc_sdp(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>> const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>> index 383b3e38df52..fb067749f3a0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>> @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> pipe_config->output_format = INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB;
>> pipe_config->has_pch_encoder = false;
>>
>> - joiner_needs_dsc = intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(dev_priv, pipe_config->joiner_pipes);
>> + joiner_needs_dsc = intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(dev_priv, num_joined_pipes);
>>
>> dsc_needed = joiner_needs_dsc || intel_dp->force_dsc_en ||
>> !intel_dp_mst_compute_config_limits(intel_dp,
>> @@ -1472,6 +1472,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> mode->hdisplay, target_clock);
>> if (num_joined_pipes == 2) {
>> joiner = true;
>> + num_joined_pipes = 2;
>> max_dotclk *= 2;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1512,7 +1513,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> dsc = dsc_max_compressed_bpp && dsc_slice_count;
>> }
>>
>> - if (intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(dev_priv, joiner) && !dsc) {
>> + if (intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(dev_priv, num_joined_pipes) && !dsc) {
>> *status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-12 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 13:13 [PATCH 00/19] Ultrajoiner basic functionality series Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/display: Check whether platform supports joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/display: Modify debugfs for joiner to force n pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 03/19] drm/i915/display_debugfs: Allow force joiner only if supported Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 20:00 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-11 20:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915/dp: Add helper to compute num pipes joined Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 20:10 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915/display: Add debugfs support to avoid joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/display: Simplify intel_joiner_num_pipes and its usage Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 20:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-12 10:15 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/display: Use joined pipes in intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 20:17 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-12 10:20 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2024-09-12 10:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-12 11:04 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915/display: Use joined pipes in intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915/display: Use joined pipes in dsc helpers for slices, bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915: Add some essential functionality for joiners Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915: Split current joiner hw state readout Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 20:28 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915: Add bigjoiner and uncompressed joiner hw readout sanity checks Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915: Implement hw state readout and checks for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 20:33 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/display: Percolate ultrajoiner info to get_joiner_config Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 20:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915/display/vdsc: Add ultrajoiner support with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 20:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915: Add new abstraction layer to handle pipe order for different joiners Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 22:38 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-16 7:39 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-16 14:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-16 15:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-17 9:22 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-17 12:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915: Compute config and mode valid changes for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915/display: Consider ultrajoiner for computing maxdotclock Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915/intel_dp: Add support for forcing ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-11 19:29 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series (rev8) Patchwork
2024-09-11 23:05 ` [PATCH 00/19] Ultrajoiner basic functionality series Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-12 11:02 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98619708-7750-4a4c-a1d1-8e67965a6909@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.saarinen@intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox