Re: [PATCH] drm: Document code of conduct

[Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>]

On 04/11/2017 01:03 PM, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> On 11 April 2017 at 12:38, Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11 April 2017 at 07:48, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>>> Note: As Daniel Stone mentioned in the announcement fd.o admins
>>> started chatting with the communities their hosting, which includs the
>>> X.org foundation board, to figure out how to fan out enforcement and
>>> allow projects to run things on their own (with fd.o still as the
>>> fallback).  So the details of enforcement (and appealing decisions)
>>> might still change, but since this involves the board and lots more
>>> people it'll take a while to get there. For now this is good enough I
>>> think.
>>
>> All true.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
>>
> Thanks for this, Daniel!
>
> Reviewed-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>

Thanks,
Archit

>
> Best,
> Sumit.
>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx