From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: James Sewart <jamessewart@arista.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] iommu/intel: Handle 36b addressing for x86-32
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:13:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98c34926-6085-81f2-dce2-53ef1ce1edc8@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200822160209.28512-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Hi Chris,
On 2020/8/23 0:02, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Beware that the address size for x86-32 may exceed unsigned long.
>
> [ 0.368971] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c:128:14
> [ 0.369055] shift exponent 36 is too large for 32-bit type 'long unsigned int'
>
> If we don't handle the wide addresses, the pages are mismapped and the
> device read/writes go astray, detected as DMAR faults and leading to
> device failure. The behaviour changed (from working to broken) in commit
> fa954e683178 ("iommu/vt-d: Delegate the dma domain to upper layer"), but
commit <fa954e683178> ("iommu/vt-d: Delegate the dma domain to upper layer")
and adjust the title as "iommu/vt-d: Handle 36bit addressing for x86-32"
with above two changes,
Acked-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Best regards,
baolu
> the error looks older.
>
> Fixes: fa954e683178 ("iommu/vt-d: Delegate the dma domain to upper layer")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: James Sewart <jamessewart@arista.com>
> Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.3+
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 2e9c8c3d0da4..ba78a2e854f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -123,29 +123,29 @@ static inline unsigned int level_to_offset_bits(int level)
> return (level - 1) * LEVEL_STRIDE;
> }
>
> -static inline int pfn_level_offset(unsigned long pfn, int level)
> +static inline int pfn_level_offset(u64 pfn, int level)
> {
> return (pfn >> level_to_offset_bits(level)) & LEVEL_MASK;
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned long level_mask(int level)
> +static inline u64 level_mask(int level)
> {
> - return -1UL << level_to_offset_bits(level);
> + return -1ULL << level_to_offset_bits(level);
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned long level_size(int level)
> +static inline u64 level_size(int level)
> {
> - return 1UL << level_to_offset_bits(level);
> + return 1ULL << level_to_offset_bits(level);
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned long align_to_level(unsigned long pfn, int level)
> +static inline u64 align_to_level(u64 pfn, int level)
> {
> return (pfn + level_size(level) - 1) & level_mask(level);
> }
>
> static inline unsigned long lvl_to_nr_pages(unsigned int lvl)
> {
> - return 1 << min_t(int, (lvl - 1) * LEVEL_STRIDE, MAX_AGAW_PFN_WIDTH);
> + return 1UL << min_t(int, (lvl - 1) * LEVEL_STRIDE, MAX_AGAW_PFN_WIDTH);
> }
>
> /* VT-d pages must always be _smaller_ than MM pages. Otherwise things
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-25 3:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-22 16:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] iommu/intel: Handle 36b addressing for x86-32 Chris Wilson
2020-08-22 16:08 ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-22 16:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2020-08-22 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-08-22 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-08-25 3:13 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2020-09-04 10:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98c34926-6085-81f2-dce2-53ef1ce1edc8@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jamessewart@arista.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox