From: "Sharma, Swati2" <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [v6][PATCH 03/12] drm/i915: Add intel_color_lut_equal() to compare hw and sw gamma/degamma lut values
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 19:12:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b750067-fd23-acc2-a6d0-2c9aaf3e2ad0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190514161024.GC24299@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9995 bytes --]
On 14-May-19 9:40 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 03:13:21PM +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
>> v3: -Rebase
>> v4: -Renamed intel_compare_color_lut() to intel_color_lut_equal() [Jani]
>> -Added the default label above the correct label [Jani]
>> -Corrected smatch warn "variable dereferenced before check" [Dan Carpenter]
>> v5: -Added condition (!blob1 && !blob2) return true [Jani]
>> -Called PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT inside if (!adjust) [Jani]
>> -Added #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT [Jani]
>> v6: -Added func intel_color_get_bit_precision() to get bit precision for
>> gamma and degamma lut readout depending upon platform and
>> corresponding to load_luts() [Ankit]
>> -Added debug log for color para in intel_dump_pipe_config [Jani]
>> -Made patch11 as patch3 [Jani]
>>
>> I could think of adding intel_color_get_bit_precision() to be the way
>> to get away with bit precision problem for degamma and gamma (its like a table
>> having hard coded values depening on gamma_mode).
>> If anybody could think of better way then this then please guide.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.h | 7 +++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 24 ++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 124 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
>> index 50b98ee..1e60369 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
>> @@ -1251,6 +1251,99 @@ static int icl_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +void intel_color_get_bit_precision(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, int *bp_gamma)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>> +
>> + if (HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) {
>> + if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>> + if (crtc_state->gamma_mode == GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT) {
>> + *bp_gamma = 8;
>> + return;
> Functions can actually return values.
>
> Not sure I particularly like this function though. We can't fit
> the gamma vs. degamm stuff in here neatly. I think per-platform
> stuff to determine the precision is required to make this sane.
> And it should probably got into intel_color.c to keep things
> neatly contained.
>
> Something along the lines of:
>
> i9xx_gamma_precision()
> {
> if (!gamma_enable)
> return 0;
>
> switch (gamma_mode) {
> case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> return 8;
> case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
> return 16;
> }
> }
>
> chv_gamma_precision()
> {
> if (cgm_mode & CGM_PIPE_MODE_GAMMA)
> return 10;
> else
> return i9xx_gamma_precision();
> }
>
> chv_degamma_precision(crtc_state)
> {
> if (cgm_mode & CGM_PIPE_MODE_DEGAMMA)
> return 14;
> else
> return 0
> }
>
> ilk_gamma_precision()
> {
> if (!gamma_enable)
> return 0;
>
> if ((csc_mode & CSC_POSITION_BEFORE_GAMMA) == 0)
> return 0;
>
> switch (gamma_mode) {
> case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> return 8;
> case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
> return 10;
> }
> }
>
> ilk_degamma_precision()
> {
> if (!gamma_enable)
> return 0;
>
> if ((csc_mode & CSC_POSITION_BEFORE_GAMMA) != 0)
> return 0;
>
> switch (gamma_mode) {
> case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> return 8;
> case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
> return 10;
> }
> }
>
> ... extend to ivb, glk, and icl variants too.
ok..will do like this. thanks! sorry i was on leave.
2 queries:
(1) Since intel_color_get_bit_precision() will be used to set bit precision for gamma and degamma both, it will
return multiple values..should i return values as struct? or sending as pointer is ok?
if (HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) {
if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
*bp_gamma = chv_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
(2) (or) if this method is not fine, should we have function ptr for the same?
Please suggest the best method?
>
>> + }
>> + if (crtc_state->cgm_mode == CGM_PIPE_MODE_GAMMA)
>> + *bp_gamma = 10;
>> + } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 4) {
>> + if (crtc_state->gamma_mode == GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)
>> + *bp_gamma = 8;
>> + else
>> + *bp_gamma = 16;
>> + } else {
>> + *bp_gamma = 8;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
>> + if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) ==
>> + GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)
>> + *bp_gamma = 8;
>> + else
>> + *bp_gamma = 10;
>> + } else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
>> + if (crtc_state->gamma_mode == GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)
>> + *bp_gamma = 8;
>> + else
>> + *bp_gamma = 10;
>> + } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 7) {
>> + if (crtc_state->gamma_mode == GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)
>> + *bp_gamma = 8;
>> + else if (crtc_state->gamma_mode == GAMMA_MODE_MODE_SPLIT)
>> + *bp_gamma = 10;
>> + else
>> + *bp_gamma = 10;
>> + } else {
>> + if (crtc_state->gamma_mode == GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)
>> + *bp_gamma = 8;
>> + else
>> + *bp_gamma = 10;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool err_check(struct drm_color_lut *sw_lut,
>> + struct drm_color_lut *hw_lut, u32 err)
>> +{
>> + return ((abs((long)hw_lut->red - sw_lut->red)) <= err) &&
>> + ((abs((long)hw_lut->blue - sw_lut->blue)) <= err) &&
>> + ((abs((long)hw_lut->green - sw_lut->green)) <= err);
>> +}
>> +
>> +bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
>> + struct drm_property_blob *blob2,
>> + u32 bit_precision)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_color_lut *sw_lut, *hw_lut;
>> + int sw_lut_size, hw_lut_size, i;
>> + u32 err;
>> +
>> + if (!blob1 && !blob2)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + if (!blob1)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + if (!blob2)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + sw_lut_size = drm_color_lut_size(blob1);
>> + hw_lut_size = drm_color_lut_size(blob2);
>> +
>> + if (sw_lut_size != hw_lut_size)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + sw_lut = blob1->data;
>> + hw_lut = blob2->data;
>> +
>> + err = 0xffff >> bit_precision;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < sw_lut_size; i++) {
>> + if (!err_check(&hw_lut[i], &sw_lut[i], err))
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> {
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.h
>> index 057e8ac..f2872d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.h
>> @@ -6,13 +6,20 @@
>> #ifndef __INTEL_COLOR_H__
>> #define __INTEL_COLOR_H__
>>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> struct intel_crtc_state;
>> struct intel_crtc;
>> +struct drm_property_blob;
>>
>> void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>> int intel_color_check(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>> void intel_color_commit(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>> void intel_color_load_luts(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>> void intel_color_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>> +bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
>> + struct drm_property_blob *blob2,
>> + u32 bit_precision);
>> +void intel_color_get_bit_precision(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, int *bp_gamma);
>>
>> #endif /* __INTEL_COLOR_H__ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 3e01028..46985c15 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -11570,6 +11570,16 @@ static void intel_dump_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> drm_rect_width(&state->base.dst),
>> drm_rect_height(&state->base.dst));
>> }
>> +
>> + if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("cgm_mode:%d gamma_mode:%d gamma_enable:%d csc_enable:%d\n",
>> + pipe_config->cgm_mode, pipe_config->gamma_mode, pipe_config->gamma_enable,
>> + pipe_config->csc_enable);
>> + else
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("csc_mode:%d gamma_mode:%d gamma_enable:%d csc_enable:%d\n",
>> + pipe_config->csc_mode, pipe_config->gamma_mode, pipe_config->gamma_enable,
>> + pipe_config->csc_enable);
>> +
>> }
>>
>> static bool check_digital_port_conflicts(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>> @@ -11947,6 +11957,7 @@ static bool fastboot_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> bool adjust)
>> {
>> bool ret = true;
>> + u32 bp_gamma = 0;
>> bool fixup_inherited = adjust &&
>> (current_config->base.mode.private_flags & I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED) &&
>> !(pipe_config->base.mode.private_flags & I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED);
>> @@ -12098,6 +12109,15 @@ static bool fastboot_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> } \
>> } while (0)
>>
>> +#define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT(name, bit_precision) do { \
>> + if (!intel_color_lut_equal(current_config->name, \
>> + pipe_config->name, bit_precision)) { \
>> + pipe_config_err(adjust, __stringify(name), \
>> + "hw_state doesn't match sw_state\n"); \
>> + ret = false; \
>> + } \
>> +} while (0)
>> +
>> #define PIPE_CONF_QUIRK(quirk) \
>> ((current_config->quirks | pipe_config->quirks) & (quirk))
>>
>> @@ -12193,6 +12213,9 @@ static bool fastboot_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(csc_mode);
>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(gamma_enable);
>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(csc_enable);
>> +
>> + intel_color_get_bit_precision(pipe_config, &bp_gamma);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT(base.gamma_lut, bp_gamma);
>> }
>>
>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(double_wide);
>> @@ -12255,6 +12278,7 @@ static bool fastboot_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS
>> #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY
>> #undef PIPE_CONF_QUIRK
>> +#undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>> --
>> 1.9.1
--
~Swati Sharma
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 10418 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-14 9:43 [PATCH 00/12] drm/i915: adding state checker for gamma lut values Swati Sharma
2019-05-14 9:43 ` [v6][PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: Introduce vfunc read_luts() to create hw lut Swati Sharma
2019-05-14 15:23 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-05-15 7:45 ` Jani Nikula
2019-05-14 9:43 ` [v6][PATCH 02/12] drm/i915: Enable intel_color_get_config() Swati Sharma
2019-05-14 9:43 ` [v6][PATCH 03/12] drm/i915: Add intel_color_lut_equal() to compare hw and sw gamma/degamma lut values Swati Sharma
2019-05-14 16:10 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-05-21 13:42 ` Sharma, Swati2 [this message]
2019-05-24 15:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-05-14 9:43 ` [v6][PATCH 04/12] drm/i915: Extract i9xx_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-05-14 9:43 ` [v6][PATCH 05/12] drm/i915: Extract chv_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-05-14 9:43 ` [v6][PATCH 06/12] drm/i915: Extract i965_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-05-14 9:43 ` [v6][PATCH 07/12] drm/i915: Extract icl_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-05-14 9:43 ` [v6][PATCH 08/12] drm/i915: Extract glk_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-05-14 9:43 ` [v6][PATCH 09/12] drm/i915: Extract bdw_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-05-14 9:43 ` [v6][PATCH 10/12] drm/i915: Extract ivb_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-05-14 9:43 ` [v6][PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: Extract ilk_read_luts() Swati Sharma
2019-05-14 9:43 ` [v6][PATCH 12/12] FOR_TESTING_ONLY: Print rgb values of hw and sw blobs Swati Sharma
2019-05-14 10:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: adding state checker for gamma lut values (rev8) Patchwork
2019-05-14 10:42 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-05-14 10:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-05-14 14:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-05-14 14:27 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: adding state checker for gamma lut values (rev9) Patchwork
2019-05-14 14:33 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-05-14 15:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-05-14 22:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b750067-fd23-acc2-a6d0-2c9aaf3e2ad0@intel.com \
--to=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox