Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 08/12] drm/i915: Expose per-engine client busyness
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:04:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f190888-77f5-a7a0-c061-3578973e261e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158386512435.28297.9321243628022207699@build.alporthouse.com>


On 10/03/2020 18:32, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-03-09 18:31:25)
>> +static ssize_t
>> +show_client_busy(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +       struct i915_engine_busy_attribute *i915_attr =
>> +               container_of(attr, typeof(*i915_attr), attr);
>> +       unsigned int class = i915_attr->engine_class;
>> +       struct i915_drm_client *client = i915_attr->client;
>> +       u64 total = atomic64_read(&client->past_runtime[class]);
>> +       struct list_head *list = &client->ctx_list;
>> +       struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
>> +
>> +       rcu_read_lock();
>> +       list_for_each_entry_rcu(ctx, list, client_link) {
>> +               total += atomic64_read(&ctx->past_runtime[class]);
>> +               total += pphwsp_busy_add(ctx, class);
>> +       }
>> +       rcu_read_unlock();
>> +
>> +       total *= RUNTIME_INFO(i915_attr->i915)->cs_timestamp_period_ns;
> 
> Planning early retirement? In 600 years, they'll have forgotten how to
> email ;)

Shruggety shrug. :) I am guessing you would prefer both internal 
representations (sw and pphwsp runtimes) to be consistently in 
nanoseconds? I thought why multiply at various places when once at the 
readout time is enough.

And I should mention again how I am not sure at the moment how to meld 
the two stats into one more "perfect" output.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-10 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-09 18:31 [Intel-gfx] [RFC 00/12] Per client engine busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 01/12] drm/i915: Expose list of clients in sysfs Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 21:34   ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-09 23:26     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10  0:13       ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-10  8:44         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 11:41   ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-10 12:04     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 17:59   ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 02/12] drm/i915: Update client name on context create Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 18:11   ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-10 19:52     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 03/12] drm/i915: Make GEM contexts track DRM clients Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 18:20   ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 04/12] drm/i915: Use explicit flag to mark unreachable intel_context Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 15:30   ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 05/12] drm/i915: Track runtime spent in unreachable intel_contexts Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 18:25   ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-10 20:00     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 06/12] drm/i915: Track runtime spent in closed GEM contexts Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 18:28   ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-10 20:01     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 07/12] drm/i915: Track all user contexts per client Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 08/12] drm/i915: Expose per-engine client busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 18:32   ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-10 20:04     ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2020-03-10 20:12       ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-11 10:17         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 09/12] drm/i915: Track per-context engine busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 18:36   ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 10/12] drm/i915: Carry over past software tracked context runtime Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 11/12] drm/i915: Prefer software tracked context busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 12/12] compare runtimes Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-09 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Per client engine busyness (rev5) Patchwork
2020-03-09 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-03-09 22:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 00/12] Per client engine busyness Chris Wilson
2020-03-09 23:30   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-03-10 15:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Per client engine busyness (rev5) Patchwork
2020-03-10 15:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2020-03-10 15:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-03-10 15:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9f190888-77f5-a7a0-c061-3578973e261e@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox