From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jason.ekstrand@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Move engine->schedule to i915_sched_engine
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 16:32:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fcf0de6-5e10-36a1-bf8f-c849a901b80c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210608191754.127059-6-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On 6/8/2021 12:17 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> The schedule function should be in the schedule object.
>
> v3:
> (Jason Ekstrand)
> Add kernel doc
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Daniele
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 3 ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h | 8 --------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c | 2 +-
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c | 4 ++--
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 10 +++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 11 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
> index 1e97520c62b2..1070d3afdce7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
> @@ -104,8 +104,8 @@ static void fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
> engine = rq->engine;
>
> rcu_read_lock(); /* RCU serialisation for set-wedged protection */
> - if (engine->schedule)
> - engine->schedule(rq, attr);
> + if (engine->sched_engine->schedule)
> + engine->sched_engine->schedule(rq, attr);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> index 3c3f09a4acdd..7ff2640aa74a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> @@ -328,9 +328,6 @@ static int intel_engine_setup(struct intel_gt *gt, enum intel_engine_id id)
> if (engine->context_size)
> DRIVER_CAPS(i915)->has_logical_contexts = true;
>
> - /* Nothing to do here, execute in order of dependencies */
> - engine->schedule = NULL;
> -
> ewma__engine_latency_init(&engine->latency);
> seqcount_init(&engine->stats.lock);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c
> index b99ac41695f3..b6a305e6a974 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static void heartbeat(struct work_struct *wrk)
> * but all other contexts, including the kernel
> * context are stuck waiting for the signal.
> */
> - } else if (engine->schedule &&
> + } else if (engine->sched_engine->schedule &&
> rq->sched.attr.priority < I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER) {
> /*
> * Gradually raise the priority of the heartbeat to
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static void heartbeat(struct work_struct *wrk)
> attr.priority = I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER;
>
> local_bh_disable();
> - engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
> + engine->sched_engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
> local_bh_enable();
> } else {
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM))
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
> index 5e0f39d202ef..0bb65c57d274 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
> @@ -428,14 +428,6 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
> void (*bond_execute)(struct i915_request *rq,
> struct dma_fence *signal);
>
> - /*
> - * Call when the priority on a request has changed and it and its
> - * dependencies may need rescheduling. Note the request itself may
> - * not be ready to run!
> - */
> - void (*schedule)(struct i915_request *request,
> - const struct i915_sched_attr *attr);
> -
> void (*release)(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
>
> struct intel_engine_execlists execlists;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
> index 3cca7ea2d6ea..84142127ebd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static void set_scheduler_caps(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> for_each_uabi_engine(engine, i915) { /* all engines must agree! */
> int i;
>
> - if (engine->schedule)
> + if (engine->sched_engine->schedule)
> enabled |= (I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_ENABLED |
> I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_PRIORITY);
> else
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> index 0591698573e8..8a3d4014fd2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> @@ -3119,7 +3119,7 @@ static bool can_preempt(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> static void execlists_set_default_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> engine->submit_request = execlists_submit_request;
> - engine->schedule = i915_schedule;
> + engine->sched_engine->schedule = i915_schedule;
> engine->execlists.tasklet.callback = execlists_submission_tasklet;
> }
>
> @@ -3701,7 +3701,7 @@ intel_execlists_create_virtual(struct intel_engine_cs **siblings,
> ve->base.cops = &virtual_context_ops;
> ve->base.request_alloc = execlists_request_alloc;
>
> - ve->base.schedule = i915_schedule;
> + ve->base.sched_engine->schedule = i915_schedule;
> ve->base.submit_request = virtual_submit_request;
> ve->base.bond_execute = virtual_bond_execute;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
> index d213fc4df411..6c0583e7a4c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static int live_unlite_restore(struct intel_gt *gt, int prio)
> };
>
> /* Alternatively preempt the spinner with ce[1] */
> - engine->schedule(rq[1], &attr);
> + engine->sched_engine->schedule(rq[1], &attr);
> }
>
> /* And switch back to ce[0] for good measure */
> @@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ release_queue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> i915_request_add(rq);
>
> local_bh_disable();
> - engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
> + engine->sched_engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
> local_bh_enable(); /* kick tasklet */
>
> i915_request_put(rq);
> @@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ static int live_timeslice_queue(void *arg)
> err = PTR_ERR(rq);
> goto err_heartbeat;
> }
> - engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
> + engine->sched_engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
> err = wait_for_submit(engine, rq, HZ / 2);
> if (err) {
> pr_err("%s: Timed out trying to submit semaphores\n",
> @@ -1867,7 +1867,7 @@ static int live_late_preempt(void *arg)
> }
>
> attr.priority = I915_PRIORITY_MAX;
> - engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
> + engine->sched_engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
>
> if (!igt_wait_for_spinner(&spin_hi, rq)) {
> pr_err("High priority context failed to preempt the low priority context\n");
> @@ -2480,7 +2480,7 @@ static int live_suppress_self_preempt(void *arg)
> i915_request_add(rq_b);
>
> GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_completed(rq_a));
> - engine->schedule(rq_a, &attr);
> + engine->sched_engine->schedule(rq_a, &attr);
> igt_spinner_end(&a.spin);
>
> if (!igt_wait_for_spinner(&b.spin, rq_b)) {
> @@ -2612,7 +2612,7 @@ static int live_chain_preempt(void *arg)
>
> i915_request_get(rq);
> i915_request_add(rq);
> - engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
> + engine->sched_engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
>
> igt_spinner_end(&hi.spin);
> if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 5) < 0) {
> @@ -2971,7 +2971,7 @@ static int live_preempt_gang(void *arg)
> break;
>
> /* Submit each spinner at increasing priority */
> - engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
> + engine->sched_engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
> } while (prio <= I915_PRIORITY_MAX &&
> !__igt_timeout(end_time, NULL));
> pr_debug("%s: Preempt chain of %d requests\n",
> @@ -3219,7 +3219,7 @@ static int preempt_user(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> i915_request_get(rq);
> i915_request_add(rq);
>
> - engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
> + engine->sched_engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
>
> if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 2) < 0)
> err = -ETIME;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
> index 853246fad05f..cec4b9977c9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
> @@ -858,12 +858,12 @@ static int active_engine(void *data)
> rq[idx] = i915_request_get(new);
> i915_request_add(new);
>
> - if (engine->schedule && arg->flags & TEST_PRIORITY) {
> + if (engine->sched_engine->schedule && arg->flags & TEST_PRIORITY) {
> struct i915_sched_attr attr = {
> .priority =
> i915_prandom_u32_max_state(512, &prng),
> };
> - engine->schedule(rq[idx], &attr);
> + engine->sched_engine->schedule(rq[idx], &attr);
> }
>
> err = active_request_put(old);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index 6b8f6544d91a..60121809e6e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ static void guc_default_vfuncs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> engine->cops = &guc_context_ops;
> engine->request_alloc = guc_request_alloc;
>
> - engine->schedule = i915_schedule;
> + engine->sched_engine->schedule = i915_schedule;
>
> engine->reset.prepare = guc_reset_prepare;
> engine->reset.rewind = guc_reset_rewind;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> index bd58198735dc..c5989c0b83d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> @@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ __i915_request_await_execution(struct i915_request *to,
> }
>
> /* Couple the dependency tree for PI on this exposed to->fence */
> - if (to->engine->schedule) {
> + if (to->engine->sched_engine->schedule) {
> err = i915_sched_node_add_dependency(&to->sched,
> &from->sched,
> I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK);
> @@ -1484,7 +1484,7 @@ i915_request_await_request(struct i915_request *to, struct i915_request *from)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - if (to->engine->schedule) {
> + if (to->engine->sched_engine->schedule) {
> ret = i915_sched_node_add_dependency(&to->sched,
> &from->sched,
> I915_DEPENDENCY_EXTERNAL);
> @@ -1671,7 +1671,7 @@ __i915_request_add_to_timeline(struct i915_request *rq)
> __i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(&rq->submit,
> &prev->fence,
> &rq->dmaq);
> - if (rq->engine->schedule)
> + if (rq->engine->sched_engine->schedule)
> __i915_sched_node_add_dependency(&rq->sched,
> &prev->sched,
> &rq->dep,
> @@ -1743,8 +1743,8 @@ void __i915_request_queue(struct i915_request *rq,
> * decide whether to preempt the entire chain so that it is ready to
> * run at the earliest possible convenience.
> */
> - if (attr && rq->engine->schedule)
> - rq->engine->schedule(rq, attr);
> + if (attr && rq->engine->sched_engine->schedule)
> + rq->engine->sched_engine->schedule(rq, attr);
>
> local_bh_disable();
> __i915_request_queue_bh(rq);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
> index 74e3bb2b2a65..0c1e417b0164 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,16 @@ struct i915_sched_engine {
> * @no_priolist: priority lists disabled
> */
> bool no_priolist;
> +
> + /**
> + * @schedule: adjust priority of request
> + *
> + * Call when the priority on a request has changed and it and its
> + * dependencies may need rescheduling. Note the request itself may
> + * not be ready to run!
> + */
> + void (*schedule)(struct i915_request *request,
> + const struct i915_sched_attr *attr);
> };
>
> #endif /* _I915_SCHEDULER_TYPES_H_ */
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-14 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-08 19:17 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Introduce i915_sched_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-06-08 19:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Move priolist to new " Matthew Brost
2021-06-14 22:53 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-06-08 19:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Add i915_sched_engine_is_empty function Matthew Brost
2021-06-08 19:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Reset sched_engine.no_priolist immediately after dequeue Matthew Brost
2021-06-08 19:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Move active tracking to i915_sched_engine Matthew Brost
2021-06-14 23:29 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-06-08 19:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Move engine->schedule " Matthew Brost
2021-06-14 23:32 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2021-06-08 19:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Add kick_backend function " Matthew Brost
2021-06-14 23:44 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-06-08 19:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Update i915_scheduler to operate on i915_sched_engine Matthew Brost
2021-06-08 19:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Move submission tasklet to i915_sched_engine Matthew Brost
2021-06-15 1:05 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-06-15 3:34 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-08 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Introduce i915_sched_engine object (rev3) Patchwork
2021-06-08 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2021-06-09 1:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-15 20:58 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Introduce i915_sched_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-06-15 20:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Move engine->schedule to i915_sched_engine Matthew Brost
2021-06-15 22:43 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Introduce i915_sched_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-06-15 22:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Move engine->schedule to i915_sched_engine Matthew Brost
2021-06-18 1:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Introduce i915_sched_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-06-18 1:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Move engine->schedule to i915_sched_engine Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9fcf0de6-5e10-36a1-bf8f-c849a901b80c@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jason.ekstrand@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox