Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Power management SAGV/QGV calculation rounding fix

["Govindapillai, Vinod" <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>]

Hi Stan

Few other places also do not ceil the result as per the 64631

deinterleave, peakbw, clperchgroup 

Well! I am not sure if this has any real impact, but FYI

Vinod

On Tue, 2023-03-14 at 11:27 +0200, Govindapillai, Vinod wrote:
> Hi Stan,
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2023-03-10 at 16:40 +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > Currently in our bandwidth calculations for QGV
> > points we round up the calculations.
> > Recently there was an update to BSpec, recommending
> > to floor those calculations.
> > The reasoning behind this was that, overestimating
> > BW demand with that rounding can cause SAGV to use
> > next QGV point, even though the less demanding could
> > be used, thus resulting in waste of power.
> > 
> > BSpec: 64636
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 10 +++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> > index 202321ffbe2a..8723ddd4d568 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> > @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int dg1_mchbar_read_qgv_point_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >                 dclk_reference = 6; /* 6 * 16.666 MHz = 100 MHz */
> >         else
> >                 dclk_reference = 8; /* 8 * 16.666 MHz = 133 MHz */
> > -       sp->dclk = DIV_ROUND_UP((16667 * dclk_ratio * dclk_reference) + 500, 1000);
> > +       sp->dclk = ((16667 * dclk_ratio * dclk_reference) + 500) / 1000;
> >  
> >         val = intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, SKL_MC_BIOS_DATA_0_0_0_MCHBAR_PCU);
> >         if (val & DG1_GEAR_TYPE)
> > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >                 return ret;
> >  
> >         dclk = val & 0xffff;
> > -       sp->dclk = DIV_ROUND_UP((16667 * dclk) + (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 11 ? 500 : 0), 1000);
> > +       sp->dclk = ((16667 * dclk) + (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) > 11 ? 500 : 0)) / 1000;
> >         sp->t_rp = (val & 0xff0000) >> 16;
> >         sp->t_rcd = (val & 0xff000000) >> 24;
> >  
> > @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static int mtl_read_qgv_point_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >         val2 = intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore,
> >                                  MTL_MEM_SS_INFO_QGV_POINT_HIGH(point));
> >         dclk = REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_DCLK_MASK, val);
> > -       sp->dclk = DIV_ROUND_UP((16667 * dclk), 1000);
> > +       sp->dclk = (16667 * dclk) / 1000;
> 
> Not related to this patch. But as per Bspec 64631 and 64636
>   sp->dclk = (16667 * dclk + 500) / 1000;
> 
> Does that need to be corrected as well?
> 
> BR
> vinod
> 
> 
> >         sp->t_rp = REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_TRP_MASK, val);
> >         sp->t_rcd = REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_TRCD_MASK, val);
> >  
> > @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static int icl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct
> > intel
> >                          */
> >                         ct = max_t(int, sp->t_rc, sp->t_rp + sp->t_rcd +
> >                                    (clpchgroup - 1) * qi.t_bl + sp->t_rdpre);
> > -                       bw = DIV_ROUND_UP(sp->dclk * clpchgroup * 32 * num_channels, ct);
> > +                       bw = (sp->dclk * clpchgroup * 32 * num_channels) / ct;
> >  
> >                         bi->deratedbw[j] = min(maxdebw,
> >                                                bw * (100 - sa->derating) / 100);
> > @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static int tgl_get_bw_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, const struct
> > intel
> >                          */
> >                         ct = max_t(int, sp->t_rc, sp->t_rp + sp->t_rcd +
> >                                    (clpchgroup - 1) * qi.t_bl + sp->t_rdpre);
> > -                       bw = DIV_ROUND_UP(sp->dclk * clpchgroup * 32 * num_channels, ct);
> > +                       bw = (sp->dclk * clpchgroup * 32 * num_channels) / ct;
> >  
> >                         bi->deratedbw[j] = min(maxdebw,
> >                                                bw * (100 - sa->derating) / 100);
>