messages from 2020-02-24 12:52:40 to 2020-02-25 15:32:34 UTC [more...]
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/51] drm managed resources, v2
2020-02-25 15:03 UTC (8+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/51] drm/rockchip: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm managed resources, v2
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/51] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/perf: Mark up the racy use of perf->exclusive_stream
2020-02-25 15:32 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] drm: Put drm_display_mode on diet
2020-02-25 15:19 UTC (13+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm: Nuke mode->vrefresh
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/12] drm: Shrink drm_display_mode timings
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm: Shrink mode->private_flags
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: avoid spurious EBUSY due to nonblocking atomic modesets
2020-02-25 15:09 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm: avoid spurious EBUSY due to nonblocking atomic modesets (rev3)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/7] 3 display pipes combination system support
2020-02-25 15:06 UTC (10+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/i915: Remove (pipe == crtc->index) assumption
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/i915: Fix broken transcoder err state
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/i915: Fix wrongly populated plane possible_crtcs bit mask
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/i915: Get first crtc instead of PIPE_A crtc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/i915: Add WARN_ON in intel_get_crtc_for_pipe()
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/i915: Fix broken num_entries in skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for 3 display pipes combination system support (rev4)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH][next] drm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
2020-02-25 15:04 UTC (3+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 0/8] Refactor Gen11+ SAGV support
2020-02-25 15:00 UTC (15+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 1/8] drm/i915: Start passing latency as parameter
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 2/8] drm/i915: Introduce skl_plane_wm_level accessor
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 3/8] drm/i915: Add intel_bw_get_*_state helpers
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 4/8] drm/i915: Introduce more *_state_changed indicators
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 5/8] drm/i915: Refactor intel_can_enable_sagv
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 6/8] drm/i915: Added required new PCode commands
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 7/8] drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 8/8] drm/i915: Enable SAGV support for Gen12
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Refactor Gen11+ SAGV support
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: "
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/20] drm/i915: Drop inspection of execbuf flags during evict
2020-02-25 14:38 UTC (20+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/20] drm/i915/gem: Extract transient execbuf flags from i915_vma
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/20] drm/i915: Separate lookup and pinning in execbuf
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/20] drm/i915: Add an implementation for i915_gem_ww_ctx locking, v2
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/20] drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/20] drm/i915: Parse command buffer earlier in eb_relocate(slow)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/20] drm/i915: Use per object locking in execbuf on top of struct_mutex, v4
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/20] drm/i915: Use ww locking in intel_renderstate
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/20] drm/i915: Add ww context handling to context_barrier_task
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/20] drm/i915: Nuke arguments to eb_pin_engine
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/20] drm/i915: Pin engine before pinning all objects, v3
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/20] drm/i915: Rework intel_context pinning to do everything outside of pin_mutex
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/20] drm/i915: Make sure execbuffer always passes ww state to i915_vma_pin
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/20] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object/client_blt.c to use ww locking as well, v2
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/20] drm/i915: Kill last user of intel_context_create_request outside of selftests
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/20] drm/i915: Convert i915_perf to ww locking as well
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/20] drm/i915: Dirty hack to fix selftests locking inversion
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/20] drm/i915/selftests: Fix locking inversion in lrc selftest
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/20] drm/i915: Use ww pinning for intel_context_create_request()
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/20] drm/i915: Move i915_vma_lock in the live selftest to avoid lock inversion
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Replace the hardcoded I915_FENCE_TIMEOUT
2020-02-25 14:36 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Drop I915_RESET_TIMEOUT and friends
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Drop I915_IDLE_ENGINES_TIMEOUT
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Reset queue_priority_hint after wedging
2020-02-25 14:16 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for "
[Intel-gfx] i915 GPU-hang regression in v5.6-rcx
2020-02-25 14:12 UTC (4+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: Introduce i915 based i915_MISSING_CASE macro and us it in i915
2020-02-25 14:01 UTC (12+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Add i915 device based MISSING_CASE macro
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915/display/cdclk: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915/display/ddi: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/display/display: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/dp: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/display/hdmi: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/display: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/gem: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/gt: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: split out intel_dram.[ch] from i915_drv.c
2020-02-25 13:41 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/dram: use intel_uncore_*() functions for register access
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/drv: use intel_uncore_write() "
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: split out intel_dram.[ch] from i915_drv.c
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: significantly reduce the use of <drm/i915_drm.h>
2020-02-25 13:41 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915/gt: make a gt sysfs group and move power management files
2020-02-25 12:29 UTC (8+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] perf: Avoid the regular drm_open_driver exithandler
2020-02-25 11:51 UTC (2+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Drop assertion that active->fence is unchanged
2020-02-25 11:23 UTC (18+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Manually acquire engine-wakeref around use of kernel_context
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/gt: Pull marking vm as closed underneath the vm->mutex
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/gem: Cleanup shadow batch after I915_EXEC_SECURE
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Protect i915_request_await_start from early waits
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/selftests: Verify LRC isolation
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/selftests: Check recovery from corrupted LRC
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/selftests: Be a little more lenient for reset workers
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/gem: Consolidate ctx->engines[] release
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/gt: Prevent allocation on a banned context
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/gem: Check that the context wasn't closed during setup
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Drop assertion that active->fence is unchanged
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure "
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Drop assertion that active->fence is unchanged (rev2)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
[Intel-gfx] [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Introduce drm scaling filter property
2020-02-25 11:07 UTC (12+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [RFC][PATCH 1/5] drm: Introduce "
` [Intel-gfx] [RFC][PATCH 2/5] drm/drm-kms.rst: Add Scaling filter property documentation
` [Intel-gfx] [RFC][PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Enable scaling filter for plane and pipe
` [Intel-gfx] [RFC][PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Introduce scaling filter related registers and bit fields
` [Intel-gfx] [RFC][PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/display: Add Nearest-neighbor based integer scaling support
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce drm scaling filter property
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 00/12] Introduce CAP_PERFMON to secure system performance monitoring and observability
2020-02-25 9:55 UTC (2+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [V7 0/9] Add support for mipi dsi cmd mode
2020-02-25 9:00 UTC (8+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [V7 1/9] drm/i915/dsi: Configure transcoder operation for command mode
` [Intel-gfx] [V7 2/9] drm/i915/dsi: Add vblank calculation "
` [Intel-gfx] [V7 4/9] drm/i915/dsi: Add check for periodic "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/huc: Fix error reported by I915_PARAM_HUC_STATUS
2020-02-25 7:49 UTC (2+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Manually acquire engine-wakeref around use of kernel_context
2020-02-25 0:50 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for "
[Intel-gfx] [v3] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1606054188:tgl
2020-02-25 0:14 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1606054188:tgl (rev3)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: remove redundant assignment to variable dw
2020-02-24 23:39 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_ctx_persistence: Check precision of hostile cancellation
2020-02-24 21:56 UTC
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084
2020-02-24 21:54 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Verify LRC isolation
2020-02-24 21:42 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/selftests: Verify LRC isolation (rev3)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/amdgpu: implement amdgpu_gem_prime_move_notify v2
2020-02-24 21:11 UTC (15+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/tgl: Extend Wa_1409825376 stepping
2020-02-24 21:07 UTC (17+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1409804808
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/tgl: Implement Wa_1806527549
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1409085225, Wa_14010229206
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/tgl: Add note to Wa_1607297627
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/tgl: Add note about Wa_1607063988
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/tgl: Extend Wa_1409767108 to B0
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/8] drm/i915/tgl: Extend Wa_1409825376 stepping
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084
2020-02-24 21:06 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/tgl: Add Wa_1608008084 (rev2)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Make the kernel_context pulse explicit
2020-02-24 20:37 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Cleanup shadow batch after I915_EXEC_SECURE
2020-02-24 20:07 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4-CI] drm/i915/psr: Force PSR probe only after full initialization
2020-02-24 18:53 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/psr: Force PSR probe only after full initialization (rev7)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Drop assertion that active->fence is unchanged
2020-02-24 18:32 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix header test with GCOV
2020-02-22 5:49 UTC (5+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] docs: gpu: i915.rst: fix warnings due to file renames
2020-02-22 9:00 UTC
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Pull marking vm as closed underneath the vm->mutex
2020-02-24 18:00 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/1] Adding YUV444 packed format support for skl+
2020-02-24 17:56 UTC (7+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Adding YUV444 packed format support for skl+ (rev3)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success "
[Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915: split intel_modeset_init() to pre/post irq install
2020-02-24 16:36 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/dsb: Pre allocate and late cleanup of cmd buffer
2020-02-24 16:34 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/dsb: Pre allocate and late cleanup of cmd buffer (rev2)
[Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915: Avoid recursing onto active vma from the shrinker
2020-02-24 15:59 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: stop assigning drm->dev_private pointer
2020-02-24 14:42 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gtt: Downgrade gen7 (ivb, byt, hsw) back to aliasing-ppgtt
2020-02-24 14:32 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH resend 1/2] drm/i915: panel: Use intel_panel_compute_brightness() from pwm_setup_backlight()
2020-02-24 14:19 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [resend,1/2] "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] dma-buf: add dynamic DMA-buf handling v15
2020-02-24 13:52 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/7] dma-buf: add dynamic DMA-buf handling v15 (rev2)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Correctly terminate connector iteration
2020-02-24 13:50 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Fix inverted WARN_ON
2020-02-24 13:47 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display: Fix inverted WARN_ON (rev3)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/selftests: Verify LRC isolation
2020-02-24 13:17 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/14] "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v17 0/7] Refactor Gen11+ SAGV support
2020-02-24 13:00 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Refactor Gen11+ SAGV support (rev2)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dma-buf: Precheck for a valid dma_fence before acquiring the reference
2020-02-24 12:59 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for "
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
- recent:[subjects (threaded)|topics (new)|topics (active)]
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).