Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Brzezinka <sebastian.brzezinka@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>,
	<vidya.srinivas@intel.com>, <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: Disable compression tricks on JSL"
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 17:00:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D88HRP898QST.23MJT5TUM1HFR@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z8htKL3L5ICwXzNb@intel.com>

Hi Ville

On Wed Mar 5, 2025 at 3:26 PM UTC, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:49:46PM +0000, Sebastian Brzezinka wrote:
>> This reverts commit 0ddae025ab6cefa9aba757da3cd1d27908d70b0e.
>> 
>> According to bspec 14181, CACHE_MODE_0 is a register that's under userspace
>> control, and DISABLE_REPACKING_FOR_COMPRESSION workaround should be already
>> in all recent Mesa releases. So, there is no need to include it in kernel.
>
> igt doesn't have it.
>
>> 
>> Also, this workaround·sporadically fails to load:
>> ```
>> ERROR GT0: engine workaround lost on application! (reg[7000]=0x0,
>> relevant bits were 0x0 vs expected 0x8000)
>> ```
>
> If it somehow fails to load from the kernel why would it
> work from userspace?
>
> Hmm, apparently CACHE_MODE_0 needs the mcr steering stuff.
> Does that fix the verification fail?

Thanks for sugestion. Right now I think that I try to move this wa to
icl_ctx_workarounds_init as both Mat and Chriss notice that register
is a part of the context. 

-- 
Best regards,
Sebastian


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-05 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-05 14:49 [RFC PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: Disable compression tricks on JSL" Sebastian Brzezinka
2025-03-05 15:03 ` Sebastian Brzezinka
2025-03-05 15:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-03-05 17:00   ` Sebastian Brzezinka [this message]
2025-03-06 12:52     ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-03-05 19:16 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2025-03-05 21:41 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D88HRP898QST.23MJT5TUM1HFR@intel.com \
    --to=sebastian.brzezinka@intel.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=vidya.srinivas@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox