From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/pmu: Stop peeking at kernel internals for counting interrupts
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:45:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X9JsylVFlr9ufO3/@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210173545.1508568-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 05:35:45PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> Peeking at kernel internals is bad taste so instead we keep our own
> counter which also solves the problem of shared interrupt lines.
>
> Additional cost should be way below noise relative to mmio reads.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 19 +------------------
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 5d04b282c060..de5cdcdc46b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -889,6 +889,9 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
> /* protects the irq masks */
> spinlock_t irq_lock;
>
> + /** Overall irq handler invocations. */
> + u64 irq_count;
> +
> bool display_irqs_enabled;
>
> /* To control wakeup latency, e.g. for irq-driven dp aux transfers. */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index b245109f73e3..a88c1da025f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1596,6 +1596,8 @@ static irqreturn_t valleyview_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> if (!intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv))
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
> + dev_priv->irq_count++;
Would rather have to be something like
if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED)
irq_count++;
if we really wanted to count only our interrupts when the
irq line is shared.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-10 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-10 17:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/pmu: Stop peeking at kernel internals for counting interrupts Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-12-10 18:29 ` Chris Wilson
2020-12-10 18:45 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-12-10 20:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for " Patchwork
2020-12-10 20:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X9JsylVFlr9ufO3/@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox