From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dsi: fix DSS CTL register offsets for TGL+
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 18:00:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/92swZjW47GuN2c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y/9xf6SkV1fG4JSA@intel.com>
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 05:38:39PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 05:14:09PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On TGL+ the DSS control registers are at different offsets, and there's
> > one per pipe. Fix the offsets to fix dual link DSI for TGL+.
> >
> > There would be helpers for this in the DSC code, but just do the quick
> > fix now for DSI. Long term, we should probably move all the DSS handling
> > into intel_vdsc.c, so exporting the helpers seems counter-productive.
>
> I'm not entirely happy with intel_vdsc.c since it handles
> both the hardware VDSC block (which includes DSS, and so
> also uncompressed joiner and MSO), and also some actual
> DSC calculations/etc. Might be nice to have a cleaner
> split of some sort.
>
> That also reminds me that MSO+dsc/joiner is probably going
> to fail miserably given that neither side knows about the
> other and both poke the DSS registers.
I suppose MSO+joiner should just be rejected outright since
the splitter seems to sit before the joiner in the path.
We'd need them to be the other way around.
But MSO+DSC does look plausible.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-01 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-01 15:14 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dsi: fix DSS CTL register offsets for TGL+ Jani Nikula
2023-03-01 15:38 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-01 16:00 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2023-03-06 16:25 ` Jani Nikula
2023-03-01 21:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2023-03-03 14:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dsi: fix DSS CTL register offsets for TGL+ (rev2) Patchwork
2023-03-04 13:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/dsi: fix DSS CTL register offsets for TGL+ Patchwork
2023-03-06 20:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/dsi: fix DSS CTL register offsets for TGL+ (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/92swZjW47GuN2c@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox