From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/18] drm/i915: Sanitize child devices later
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:59:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/TcVtA+2xRgByyD@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y/TZeHrjdT/4bRkN@intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 04:47:20PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 01:40:35AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > index f35ef3675d39..19be8862261b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > @@ -2221,33 +2221,33 @@ static u8 map_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 vbt_pin)
> > vbt_pin);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static enum port get_port_by_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 ddc_pin)
> > +static struct intel_encoder *
> > +get_encoder_by_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 ddc_pin)
> > {
> > - enum port port;
> > + struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> >
> > if (!ddc_pin)
> > - return PORT_NONE;
> > + return NULL;
> >
> > - for_each_port(port) {
> > - const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata =
> > - i915->display.vbt.ports[port];
> > + for_each_intel_encoder(&i915->drm, encoder) {
> > + const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata = encoder->devdata;
> >
> > if (devdata && ddc_pin == devdata->child.ddc_pin)
> > - return port;
> > + return encoder;
>
> This still screws up bat-jsl-3 where DDI A and DDI C both claim to use
> the same ddc_pin. But DDI A is declared as eDP, so won't even use DDC.
> Se we should just ignore it here.
bat-jsl-1 has the same issue.
bat-rpls-1/2 also have a similar thing, but there the eDP is a ghost
so won't actually trip here.
I also noticed that bat-rplp-1 declares eDP on both DDI A and B,
and it's the one on DDI B that is the real one. Curious.
>
> I suppose to correct fix would to look at the actually selected
> ddc_pin/aux_ch here, rather than what the VBT declared.
>
> > }
> >
> > - return PORT_NONE;
> > + return NULL;
> > }
> >
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-21 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-20 23:40 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/18] drm/i915: Init DDI ports in VBT order Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/18] drm/i915: Populate dig_port->connected() before connector init Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/18] drm/i915: Fix SKL DDI A digital port .connected() Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/18] drm/i915: Get rid of the gm45 HPD live state nonsense Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/18] drm/i915: Introduce <platoform>_hotplug_mask() Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/18] drm/i915: Introduce intel_hpd_detection() Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/18] drm/i915: Check HPD live state during eDP probe Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/18] drm/i915: Sanitize child devices later Ville Syrjala
2023-02-21 14:47 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-02-21 14:59 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/18] drm/i915: Split map_aux_ch() into per-platform arrays Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/18] drm/i915: Flip VBT DDC pin maps around Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/18] drm/i915: Nuke intel_bios_is_port_dp_dual_mode() Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/18] drm/i915: Remove bogus DDI-F from hsw/bdw output init Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/18] drm/i915: Introduce device info port_mask Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/18] drm/i915: Assert that device info bitmasks have enough bits Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/18] drm/i915: Assert that the port being initialized is valid Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/18] drm/i915: Beef up SDVO/HDMI port checks Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/18] drm/i915: Init DDI outputs based on port_mask on skl+ Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/18] drm/i915: Try to initialize DDI/ICL+ DSI ports for every VBT child device Ville Syrjala
2023-02-20 23:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/18] drm/i915: Convert HSW/BDW to use VBT driven DDI probe Ville Syrjala
2023-02-21 0:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Init DDI ports in VBT order (rev2) Patchwork
2023-02-21 0:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-02-21 3:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/TcVtA+2xRgByyD@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox