Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Fix VBT DSI DVO port handling
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 11:05:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+IUV8OBG0P2mt2b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877cwtzw93.fsf@intel.com>

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 10:59:36AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Feb 2023, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Turns out modern (icl+) VBTs still declare their DSI ports
> > as MIPI-A and MIPI-C despite the PHYs now being A and B.
> > Remap appropriately to allow the panels declared as MIPI-C
> > to work.
> >
> > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8016
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > index e6ca51232dcf..06a2d98d2277 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > @@ -2467,6 +2467,22 @@ static enum port dvo_port_to_port(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> >  					  dvo_port);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static enum port
> > +dsi_dvo_port_to_port(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 dvo_port)
> > +{
> > +	switch (dvo_port) {
> > +	case DVO_PORT_MIPIA:
> > +		return PORT_A;
> 
> I think I would add:
> 
> 	case DVO_PORT_MIPIB:
> 		if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11)
> 			return PORT_B;
> 		else
> 			return PORT_NONE;
> 
> just in case.

Looks like Windows doesn't expect MIPI-B to be used ever.
So I'm tempted to leave it out as well.

> 
> With that,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> 
> > +	case DVO_PORT_MIPIC:
> > +		if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11)
> > +			return PORT_B;
> > +		else
> > +			return PORT_C;
> > +	default:
> > +		return PORT_NONE;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int parse_bdb_230_dp_max_link_rate(const int vbt_max_link_rate)
> >  {
> >  	switch (vbt_max_link_rate) {
> > @@ -3442,19 +3458,16 @@ bool intel_bios_is_dsi_present(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> >  
> >  		dvo_port = child->dvo_port;
> >  
> > -		if (dvo_port == DVO_PORT_MIPIA ||
> > -		    (dvo_port == DVO_PORT_MIPIB && DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11) ||
> > -		    (dvo_port == DVO_PORT_MIPIC && DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 11)) {
> > -			if (port)
> > -				*port = dvo_port - DVO_PORT_MIPIA;
> > -			return true;
> > -		} else if (dvo_port == DVO_PORT_MIPIB ||
> > -			   dvo_port == DVO_PORT_MIPIC ||
> > -			   dvo_port == DVO_PORT_MIPID) {
> > +		if (dsi_dvo_port_to_port(i915, dvo_port) == PORT_NONE) {
> 
> Yeah that monstrosity should've been a separate function a long time ago!
> 
> >  			drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> >  				    "VBT has unsupported DSI port %c\n",
> >  				    port_name(dvo_port - DVO_PORT_MIPIA));
> > +			continue;
> >  		}
> > +
> > +		if (port)
> > +			*port = dsi_dvo_port_to_port(i915, dvo_port);
> > +		return true;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return false;
> > @@ -3539,7 +3552,7 @@ bool intel_bios_get_dsc_params(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  		if (!(child->device_type & DEVICE_TYPE_MIPI_OUTPUT))
> >  			continue;
> >  
> > -		if (child->dvo_port - DVO_PORT_MIPIA == encoder->port) {
> > +		if (dsi_dvo_port_to_port(i915, child->dvo_port) == encoder->port) {
> >  			if (!devdata->dsc)
> >  				return false;
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-07  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-07  6:43 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915: Fix eDP+DSI dual panel systems Ville Syrjala
2023-02-07  6:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Fix VBT DSI DVO port handling Ville Syrjala
2023-02-07  8:59   ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-07  9:05     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2023-02-07  9:33       ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-07  6:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Populate encoder->devdata for DSI on icl+ Ville Syrjala
2023-02-07  9:06   ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-08  1:27     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-02-07  6:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Pick the backlight controller based on VBT on ICP+ Ville Syrjala
2023-02-07  9:32   ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-08 15:23   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-08 16:19     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-02-09 10:14       ` Jani Nikula
2023-02-07  7:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Fix eDP+DSI dual panel systems Patchwork
2023-02-07  7:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-02-07 10:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Fix eDP+DSI dual panel systems (rev2) Patchwork
2023-02-07 22:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Fix eDP+DSI dual panel systems (rev3) Patchwork
2023-02-08  0:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y+IUV8OBG0P2mt2b@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox