From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Kandpal, Suraj" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: "Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Removing one use macro
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:00:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1EcI7NwED6SBFZG@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR11MB17419A6372C3C39271D84FF8E32A9@MWHPR11MB1741.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:48:20AM +0000, Kandpal, Suraj wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > > index 2af4a1925063..c803330a276d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > > @@ -469,10 +469,6 @@ enum hpd_pin {
> > > list_for_each_entry((intel_encoder), &(dev)-
> > >mode_config.encoder_list, base.head) \
> > > for_each_if((intel_encoder)->base.crtc == (__crtc))
> > >
> > > -#define for_each_connector_on_encoder(dev, __encoder,
> > intel_connector) \
> > > - list_for_each_entry((intel_connector), &(dev)-
> > >mode_config.connector_list, base.head) \
> > > - for_each_if((intel_connector)->base.encoder ==
> > (__encoder))
> > > -
> > > #define for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state(__state, plane,
> > old_plane_state, __i) \
> > > for ((__i) = 0; \
> > > (__i) < (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_total_plane && \
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> > > index cbfabd58b75a..31ce4ac4059c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> > > @@ -205,12 +205,22 @@ static bool intel_crtc_has_encoders(struct
> > > intel_crtc *crtc)
> > >
> > > static struct intel_connector *intel_encoder_find_connector(struct
> > > intel_encoder *encoder) {
> > > - struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
> > > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> > > struct intel_connector *connector;
> > > + struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
> > > + bool found_connector = false;
> > >
> > > - for_each_connector_on_encoder(dev, &encoder->base, connector)
> > > - return connector;
> > > + drm_connector_list_iter_begin(&i915->drm, &conn_iter);
> > > + for_each_intel_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) {
> >
> > Bogus indentation.
> >
> Hi Ville,
>
> Will remove the bogus indentation.
>
> > > + if (&encoder->base == connector->base.encoder) {
> >
> > Still using the legacy pointers so not great. But I suppse it's still better than
> > before because the horrors are now better contained in this file rather than
> > in an official looking macro.
>
> Any suggestion on how I could make this better or should I go ahead with this
> approach for now
It's fine for now. Stopping the legacy pointer usage involved
a lot of work.
>
> >
> > I do have some work in some old branch to get rid of the legacy pointer
> > crap, but it'll probably need a rewrite by now...
> >
> > > + found_connector = true;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter);
> > >
> > > + if (found_connector)
> >
> > I would make that a pointer to the connector, then you can just return it
> > directly. And as a bonus we don't use the loop iterator outside the loop
> > anymore, which is a bit questionable in general.
>
> Ah got it .
>
> Regards,
> Suraj Kandpal
>
> >
> > > + return connector;
> > > return NULL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> >
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-20 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-20 9:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/1] Removing Connector iterator macro Suraj Kandpal
2022-10-20 9:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Removing one use macro Suraj Kandpal
2022-10-20 9:28 ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-10-20 9:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-20 9:48 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2022-10-20 10:00 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1EcI7NwED6SBFZG@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox