Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/i915/display/power: use intel_de_rmw if possible
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 15:27:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7cywxMBJPmR/Vfj@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230105131046.2173431-2-andrzej.hajda@intel.com>

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 02:10:39PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The helper makes the code more compact and readable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c    | 49 ++++-------
>  .../i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c   | 82 ++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index 1a23ecd4623a53..90d7a623d6e3cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -1260,9 +1260,7 @@ static void hsw_disable_lcpll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "D_COMP RCOMP still in progress\n");
>  
>  	if (allow_power_down) {
> -		val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, LCPLL_CTL);
> -		val |= LCPLL_POWER_DOWN_ALLOW;
> -		intel_de_write(dev_priv, LCPLL_CTL, val);
> +		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, LCPLL_CTL, 0, LCPLL_POWER_DOWN_ALLOW);
>  		intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, LCPLL_CTL);
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -1306,9 +1304,7 @@ static void hsw_restore_lcpll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "LCPLL not locked yet\n");
>  
>  	if (val & LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK) {
> -		val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, LCPLL_CTL);
> -		val &= ~LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK;
> -		intel_de_write(dev_priv, LCPLL_CTL, val);
> +		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, LCPLL_CTL, LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK, 0);
>  
>  		if (wait_for_us((intel_de_read(dev_priv, LCPLL_CTL) &
>  				 LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE) == 0, 1))
> @@ -1347,15 +1343,11 @@ static void hsw_restore_lcpll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   */
>  static void hsw_enable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	u32 val;
> -
>  	drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Enabling package C8+\n");
>  
> -	if (HAS_PCH_LPT_LP(dev_priv)) {
> -		val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, SOUTH_DSPCLK_GATE_D);
> -		val &= ~PCH_LP_PARTITION_LEVEL_DISABLE;
> -		intel_de_write(dev_priv, SOUTH_DSPCLK_GATE_D, val);
> -	}
> +	if (HAS_PCH_LPT_LP(dev_priv))
> +		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, SOUTH_DSPCLK_GATE_D,
> +			     PCH_LP_PARTITION_LEVEL_DISABLE, 0);
>  
>  	lpt_disable_clkout_dp(dev_priv);
>  	hsw_disable_lcpll(dev_priv, true, true);
> @@ -1363,25 +1355,21 @@ static void hsw_enable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  static void hsw_disable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	u32 val;
> -
>  	drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Disabling package C8+\n");
>  
>  	hsw_restore_lcpll(dev_priv);
>  	intel_init_pch_refclk(dev_priv);
>  
> -	if (HAS_PCH_LPT_LP(dev_priv)) {
> -		val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, SOUTH_DSPCLK_GATE_D);
> -		val |= PCH_LP_PARTITION_LEVEL_DISABLE;
> -		intel_de_write(dev_priv, SOUTH_DSPCLK_GATE_D, val);
> -	}
> +	if (HAS_PCH_LPT_LP(dev_priv))
> +		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, SOUTH_DSPCLK_GATE_D,
> +			     0, PCH_LP_PARTITION_LEVEL_DISABLE);
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_pch_reset_handshake(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  				      bool enable)
>  {
>  	i915_reg_t reg;
> -	u32 reset_bits, val;
> +	u32 reset_bits;
>  
>  	if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev_priv)) {
>  		reg = GEN7_MSG_CTL;
> @@ -1394,14 +1382,7 @@ static void intel_pch_reset_handshake(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14)
>  		reset_bits |= MTL_RESET_PICA_HANDSHAKE_EN;
>  
> -	val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, reg);
> -
> -	if (enable)
> -		val |= reset_bits;
> -	else
> -		val &= ~reset_bits;
> -
> -	intel_de_write(dev_priv, reg, val);
> +	intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, reg, reset_bits, enable ? reset_bits : 0);

I believe we have a risk here since we were only cleaning if not enable.
But anyway this looks the right thing to do here...


Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


>  }
>  
>  static void skl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> @@ -1618,7 +1599,6 @@ static void icl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  {
>  	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &dev_priv->display.power.domains;
>  	struct i915_power_well *well;
> -	u32 val;
>  
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
>  
> @@ -1670,11 +1650,10 @@ static void icl_display_core_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		intel_dmc_load_program(dev_priv);
>  
>  	/* Wa_14011508470:tgl,dg1,rkl,adl-s,adl-p */
> -	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> -		val = DCPR_CLEAR_MEMSTAT_DIS | DCPR_SEND_RESP_IMM |
> -		      DCPR_MASK_LPMODE | DCPR_MASK_MAXLATENCY_MEMUP_CLR;
> -		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN11_CHICKEN_DCPR_2, 0, val);
> -	}
> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
> +		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN11_CHICKEN_DCPR_2, 0,
> +			     DCPR_CLEAR_MEMSTAT_DIS | DCPR_SEND_RESP_IMM |
> +			     DCPR_MASK_LPMODE | DCPR_MASK_MAXLATENCY_MEMUP_CLR);
>  
>  	/* Wa_14011503030:xelpd */
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 13)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
> index 8710dd41ffd4c6..05b431f968cb49 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
> @@ -333,7 +333,6 @@ static void hsw_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  {
>  	const struct i915_power_well_regs *regs = power_well->desc->ops->regs;
>  	int pw_idx = i915_power_well_instance(power_well)->hsw.idx;
> -	u32 val;
>  
>  	if (power_well->desc->has_fuses) {
>  		enum skl_power_gate pg;
> @@ -356,9 +355,7 @@ static void hsw_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			gen9_wait_for_power_well_fuses(dev_priv, SKL_PG0);
>  	}
>  
> -	val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, regs->driver);
> -	intel_de_write(dev_priv, regs->driver,
> -		       val | HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_REQ(pw_idx));
> +	intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, regs->driver, 0, HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_REQ(pw_idx));
>  
>  	hsw_wait_for_power_well_enable(dev_priv, power_well, false);
>  
> @@ -380,14 +377,11 @@ static void hsw_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  {
>  	const struct i915_power_well_regs *regs = power_well->desc->ops->regs;
>  	int pw_idx = i915_power_well_instance(power_well)->hsw.idx;
> -	u32 val;
>  
>  	hsw_power_well_pre_disable(dev_priv,
>  				   power_well->desc->irq_pipe_mask);
>  
> -	val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, regs->driver);
> -	intel_de_write(dev_priv, regs->driver,
> -		       val & ~HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_REQ(pw_idx));
> +	intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, regs->driver, HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_REQ(pw_idx), 0);
>  	hsw_wait_for_power_well_disable(dev_priv, power_well);
>  }
>  
> @@ -398,29 +392,22 @@ icl_combo_phy_aux_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	const struct i915_power_well_regs *regs = power_well->desc->ops->regs;
>  	int pw_idx = i915_power_well_instance(power_well)->hsw.idx;
>  	enum phy phy = icl_aux_pw_to_phy(dev_priv, power_well);
> -	u32 val;
>  
>  	drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv));
>  
> -	val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, regs->driver);
> -	intel_de_write(dev_priv, regs->driver,
> -		       val | HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_REQ(pw_idx));
> +	intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, regs->driver, 0, HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_REQ(pw_idx));
>  
> -	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12) {
> -		val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, ICL_PORT_CL_DW12(phy));
> -		intel_de_write(dev_priv, ICL_PORT_CL_DW12(phy),
> -			       val | ICL_LANE_ENABLE_AUX);
> -	}
> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12)
> +		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, ICL_PORT_CL_DW12(phy),
> +			     0, ICL_LANE_ENABLE_AUX);
>  
>  	hsw_wait_for_power_well_enable(dev_priv, power_well, false);
>  
>  	/* Display WA #1178: icl */
>  	if (pw_idx >= ICL_PW_CTL_IDX_AUX_A && pw_idx <= ICL_PW_CTL_IDX_AUX_B &&
> -	    !intel_bios_is_port_edp(dev_priv, (enum port)phy)) {
> -		val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, ICL_AUX_ANAOVRD1(pw_idx));
> -		val |= ICL_AUX_ANAOVRD1_ENABLE | ICL_AUX_ANAOVRD1_LDO_BYPASS;
> -		intel_de_write(dev_priv, ICL_AUX_ANAOVRD1(pw_idx), val);
> -	}
> +	    !intel_bios_is_port_edp(dev_priv, (enum port)phy))
> +		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, ICL_AUX_ANAOVRD1(pw_idx),
> +			     0, ICL_AUX_ANAOVRD1_ENABLE | ICL_AUX_ANAOVRD1_LDO_BYPASS);
>  }
>  
>  static void
> @@ -430,17 +417,12 @@ icl_combo_phy_aux_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	const struct i915_power_well_regs *regs = power_well->desc->ops->regs;
>  	int pw_idx = i915_power_well_instance(power_well)->hsw.idx;
>  	enum phy phy = icl_aux_pw_to_phy(dev_priv, power_well);
> -	u32 val;
>  
>  	drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv));
>  
> -	val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, ICL_PORT_CL_DW12(phy));
> -	intel_de_write(dev_priv, ICL_PORT_CL_DW12(phy),
> -		       val & ~ICL_LANE_ENABLE_AUX);
> +	intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, ICL_PORT_CL_DW12(phy), ICL_LANE_ENABLE_AUX, 0);
>  
> -	val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, regs->driver);
> -	intel_de_write(dev_priv, regs->driver,
> -		       val & ~HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_REQ(pw_idx));
> +	intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, regs->driver, HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_REQ(pw_idx), 0);
>  
>  	hsw_wait_for_power_well_disable(dev_priv, power_well);
>  }
> @@ -502,19 +484,15 @@ icl_tc_phy_aux_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	const struct i915_power_well_regs *regs = power_well->desc->ops->regs;
>  	bool is_tbt = power_well->desc->is_tc_tbt;
>  	bool timeout_expected;
> -	u32 val;
>  
>  	icl_tc_port_assert_ref_held(dev_priv, power_well, dig_port);
>  
> -	val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DP_AUX_CH_CTL(aux_ch));
> -	val &= ~DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TBT_IO;
> -	if (is_tbt)
> -		val |= DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TBT_IO;
> -	intel_de_write(dev_priv, DP_AUX_CH_CTL(aux_ch), val);
> +	intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, DP_AUX_CH_CTL(aux_ch),
> +		     DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TBT_IO, is_tbt ? DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TBT_IO : 0);
>  
> -	val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, regs->driver);
> -	intel_de_write(dev_priv, regs->driver,
> -		       val | HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_REQ(i915_power_well_instance(power_well)->hsw.idx));
> +	intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, regs->driver,
> +		     0,
> +		     HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL_REQ(i915_power_well_instance(power_well)->hsw.idx));
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * An AUX timeout is expected if the TBT DP tunnel is down,
> @@ -776,12 +754,8 @@ static void tgl_enable_dc3co(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  static void tgl_disable_dc3co(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	u32 val;
> -
>  	drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Disabling DC3CO\n");
> -	val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN);
> -	val &= ~DC_STATE_DC3CO_STATUS;
> -	intel_de_write(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN, val);
> +	intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN, DC_STATE_DC3CO_STATUS, 0);
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
>  	/*
>  	 * Delay of 200us DC3CO Exit time B.Spec 49196
> @@ -820,8 +794,8 @@ void gen9_enable_dc5(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  	/* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 9 && !IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
> -		intel_de_write(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> -			       intel_de_read(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) | SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT);
> +		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> +			     0, SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT);
>  
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5);
>  }
> @@ -847,8 +821,8 @@ void skl_enable_dc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  	/* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 9 && !IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
> -		intel_de_write(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> -			       intel_de_read(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) | SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT);
> +		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> +			     0, SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT);
>  
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6);
>  }
> @@ -1149,18 +1123,14 @@ static bool vlv_power_well_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>  static void vlv_init_display_clock_gating(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	u32 val;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * On driver load, a pipe may be active and driving a DSI display.
>  	 * Preserve DPOUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE to avoid the pipe getting stuck
>  	 * (and never recovering) in this case. intel_dsi_post_disable() will
>  	 * clear it when we turn off the display.
>  	 */
> -	val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DSPCLK_GATE_D(dev_priv));
> -	val &= DPOUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE;
> -	val |= VRHUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE;
> -	intel_de_write(dev_priv, DSPCLK_GATE_D(dev_priv), val);
> +	intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, DSPCLK_GATE_D(dev_priv),
> +		     ~DPOUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE, VRHUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Disable trickle feed and enable pnd deadline calculation
> @@ -1276,8 +1246,7 @@ static void vlv_dpio_cmn_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	 * both PLLs disabled, or we risk losing DPIO and PLL
>  	 * synchronization.
>  	 */
> -	intel_de_write(dev_priv, DPIO_CTL,
> -		       intel_de_read(dev_priv, DPIO_CTL) | DPIO_CMNRST);
> +	intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, DPIO_CTL, 0, DPIO_CMNRST);
>  }
>  
>  static void vlv_dpio_cmn_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> @@ -1289,8 +1258,7 @@ static void vlv_dpio_cmn_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		assert_pll_disabled(dev_priv, pipe);
>  
>  	/* Assert common reset */
> -	intel_de_write(dev_priv, DPIO_CTL,
> -		       intel_de_read(dev_priv, DPIO_CTL) & ~DPIO_CMNRST);
> +	intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, DPIO_CTL, DPIO_CMNRST, 0);
>  
>  	vlv_set_power_well(dev_priv, power_well, false);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-05 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-05 13:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/i915/display/core: use intel_de_rmw if possible Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-05 13:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/i915/display/power: " Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-05 20:27   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-02-16 16:27     ` Jani Nikula
2023-01-05 13:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915/display/dpll: " Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-05 20:32   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-05 13:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/i915/display/phys: " Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-06 15:26   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-05 13:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/i915/display/pch: " Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-06 15:28   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-05 13:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915/display/hdmi: " Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-06 15:35   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-09 10:51     ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-09 11:45       ` Jani Nikula
2023-01-05 13:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/i915/display/panel: use intel_de_rmw if possible in panel related code Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-09 19:22   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-05 13:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/i915/display/interfaces: use intel_de_rmw if possible Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-09 19:24   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-05 13:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/i915/display/misc: " Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-09 19:27   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-10  9:28     ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-10 11:36     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] " Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-10 16:15       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-05 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/i915/display/core: " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-09 11:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [v2,1/9] drm/i915/display/core: use intel_de_rmw if possible (rev2) Patchwork
2023-01-09 11:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-01-09 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2023-01-10 15:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/9] drm/i915/display/core: use intel_de_rmw if possible (rev3) Patchwork
2023-01-11 12:09   ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-11 12:12     ` Veesam, RavitejaX
2023-02-06 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/9] drm/i915/display/core: use intel_de_rmw if possible (rev4) Patchwork
2023-02-06 16:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y7cywxMBJPmR/Vfj@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox